Post history

History for ConanTroutman

Marco Rossi

Back to topic

Current version

Posted August 10, 2016 02:32 · last edited August 10, 2016 02:33

el grapadura wrote:

patrick478 wrote:

Smithy wrote:

patrick478 wrote:

Smithy wrote:

patrick478 wrote:

Smithy wrote:

People claiming he "wasn't involved" don't have much evidence to back that up as far as I can see. 

He was only punished for not reporting an alleged approach by match fixers. If that's not "not involved" then I don't know what is.

 

Sauce for that defence?

Straight from Ernie's mouth, direct to Dale and I.

 

Well you can hardly (legitimately) be indignant with me for not crediting your sidebar convo with Ernie when you just stated it without any explanation of how you knew what you claimed to know.

Perhaps if you had said "Ernie told me and Dale that..."

You don't have any evidence either by the way. What you have is heresay. But Ernie's word is good enough for me.

Should be "Ernie told Dale and I". Just saying. 

Luv ya Smiff :)

No, it should be Dale and me. In that sentence, Ernie is the subject, and you and Dale are objects. You'd use 'Dale and I' in the opposite scenario (i.e. the one where you and Dale are telling Ernie something).

Grammar lesson for the day.

Unless Patrick has converted to Rastafarianism in which case it would be " Ernie told Dale and I and I."

Previous versions

1 version
ConanTroutman edited August 10, 2016 02:33
el grapadura wrote:
patrick478 wrote:
Smithy wrote:
patrick478 wrote:
Smithy wrote:
patrick478 wrote:
Smithy wrote:

People claiming he "wasn't involved" don't have much evidence to back that up as far as I can see. 

He was only punished for not reporting an alleged approach by match fixers. If that's not "not involved" then I don't know what is.
 

Sauce for that defence?

Straight from Ernie's mouth, direct to Dale and I.
 

Well you can hardly (legitimately) be indignant with me for not crediting your sidebar convo with Ernie when you just stated it without any explanation of how you knew what you claimed to know.

Perhaps if you had said "Ernie told me and Dale that..."

You don't have any evidence either by the way. What you have is heresay. But Ernie's word is good enough for me.

Should be "Ernie told Dale and I". Just saying. 

Luv ya Smiff :)

No, it should be Dale and me. In that sentence, Ernie is the subject, and you and Dale are objects. You'd use 'Dale and I' in the opposite scenario (i.e. the one where you and Dale are telling Ernie something).

Grammar lesson for the day.

Unless Patrick has converted to Rastafarianism in which case it would be Ernie told Dale and I and I.