Or, possibly, you agree with Burgess that the successful sale of properties is another reason for concern about the Nix's future? If so, please explain it to me, because I don't understand that logic at all.
If he sells everything else, he doesn't have any assets to generate revenue and then invest in the Phoenix. Whether this was good or bad depends on how much he got for it and how much it was returning. The Dave Burgess article was just stating facts and giving quotes. It didn't express the writers opinion at all.