Post history

History for james dean

Phoenix Ownership - Rob says FTFFA (Part 1)

Back to topic

Current version

Posted July 19, 2011 08:47 · last edited March 18, 2021 07:33

Smithy wrote:
To be fair though, we are just arguing over use of the word "sold".
 
The point is that the Nix could change "owners" or "funders" or whetever very easily if:
 
1. there was someone willing to take them on (no evidence of this at all to date);
2. Terry wanted to let them go (which, for better or worse, he doesn't); and
3. the FFA approved (which you'd expect they would).
 
 
 
Exactly.  The owner/funder rubbish is a straw man and has nothing to do with the future of the club

Previous versions

1 version
Unknown editor edited March 18, 2021 07:33
Smithy wrote:
To be fair though, we are just arguing over use of the word "sold".
 
The point is that the Nix could change "owners" or "funders" or whetever very easily if:
 
1. there was someone willing to take them on (no evidence of this at all to date);
2. Terry wanted to let them go (which, for better or worse, he doesn't); and
3. the FFA approved (which you'd expect they would).
 
 
 
Exactly.  The owner/funder rubbish is a straw man and has nothing to do with the future of the club