Post history

History for Midfielder

Phoenix Ownership - Rob says FTFFA (Part 1)

Back to topic

Current version

Posted August 01, 2011 09:47 · last edited March 18, 2021 07:33

 
perhaps now would be a good time for all the buyers out there to stand up and be counted
 
 
 
Without getting over technical it may be impossible for that to happen in the open now. 

 

To explain�the funding of the Nix by Terry can only take one of three forms, first share capital, second a loan, and third as an expense to one of his other companies as the sponsor of the Nix�

 

Lest look at each of these � As share capital it is perfect Terry can sell the Nix for whatever price he can get and put these funds into his general holdings�

 

As a loan, meaning whoever buys the Nixs owes Terry companies these loans, and if Terries  companies go belly up the creditors will come chasing these loans� Because of claw back laws Terry is in no position to write these off � meaning no buyer would want the Nixs if the funding of the Nix has been by way of loans from Terries companies� 

 

As an expense, this assumes that Terries companies have written off in their books as an expense the cost of running the Nix� my guess is this has not happened as Terry would not have wanted to increase his consolidated losses�.However if Terries companies had written these off as expenses then there is no issue in selling the Nix� 

 

Nobody on the forum would I assume have any knowledge of how the funding was undertaken. My guess is only Terry and his Accountant know �

 

But if by way of a loan [which is my guess] � which does not increase his companies losses and would show a tangible asset being able to be collected then no one will go near the Nix until they are taken out of Terries hand and the licence given back to FFA�

Midfielder2011-08-01 22:55:53

Previous versions

1 version
Unknown editor edited March 18, 2021 07:33

 
perhaps now would be a good time for all the buyers out there to stand up and be counted
 
 
 
Without getting over technical it may be impossible for that to happen in the open now. 

 

To explain�the funding of the Nix by Terry can only take one of three forms, first share capital, second a loan, and third as an expense to one of his other companies as the sponsor of the Nix�

 

Lest look at each of these � As share capital it is perfect Terry can sell the Nix for whatever price he can get and put these funds into his general holdings�

 

As a loan, meaning whoever buys the Nixs owes Terry companies these loans, and if Terries  companies go belly up the creditors will come chasing these loans� Because of claw back laws Terry is in no position to write these off � meaning no buyer would want the Nixs if the funding of the Nix has been by way of loans from Terries companies� 

 

As an expense, this assumes that Terries companies have written off in their books as an expense the cost of running the Nix� my guess is this has not happened as Terry would not have wanted to increase his consolidated losses�.However if Terries companies had written these off as expenses then there is no issue in selling the Nix� 

 

Nobody on the forum would I assume have any knowledge of how the funding was undertaken. My guess is only Terry and his Accountant know �

 

But if by way of a loan [which is my guess] � which does not increase his companies losses and would show a tangible asset being able to be collected then no one will go near the Nix until they are taken out of Terries hand and the licence given back to FFA�

Midfielder2011-08-01 22:55:53