The question being can he afford to keep the Nix running out of the $30m.
I don't see how he can generate the revenue elsewhere to do so. 5% return at the post office won't support the nix?
5% at the post office would be $600,000 a year which would cover about half the losses. But we are talking a smart businessman who, while caught short by the property market collapse, can probably make more than a 5% return on investment. He's not suddenly been struck stupid, although the WGA saga might be considered contrary evidence.