So Morrison's back-up plan is five businessmen putting in $400k each per season over 5 years.
�
Any thoughts on the pros and cons of moving from a single-owner�to multi-owner model?
�
<P =Msonormal style="MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt"><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: black; mso-bidi-font-size: 11.0pt; mso-ascii-font-family: Calibri; mso-hansi-font-family: Calibri; mso-themecolor: text1"><FONT face=Calibri>Picking a coach could be interesting.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">� </SPAN>With Terry as owner, I�d be very surprised if he ever sacked Ricki.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">� </SPAN>But if you�ve got 5 owners, and 3 of them support the coach and the other don�t, then it you�ve got a clusterf**k<?:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /><o:p></o:p></SPAN>
I believe that the FFA prefer the Multi Owner set up as it means that it's less likely to have to step in should one or two of the owners decide to call it a day.
C-Diddy2011-08-31 15:31:12