Current version

Posted August 31, 2011 03:18 · last edited March 18, 2021 07:33

I fail to see how this is anything but great news for the Nix.
No-one is pushing Terry out, but if we pulls the pin, we have a credible plan b.
Interesting question about moving to multiple owners though. Personally I don't think its ideal, but definitely better than nothing, and also better than a whole heap of shareholder owners (as per the first idea for the Phoenix IIRC). If this does happen, the key would be to have a strong CEO to liaise between the 5. Would Greenham stay if Terry wasn't involved?

Previous versions

1 version
Unknown editor edited March 18, 2021 07:33

I fail to see how this is anything but great news for the Nix.

No-one is pushing Terry out, but if we pulls the pin, we have a credible plan b.
Interesting question about moving to multiple owners though. Personally I don't think its ideal, but definitely better than nothing, and also better than a whole heap of shareholder owners (as per the first idea for the Phoenix IIRC). If this does happen, the key would be to have a strong CEO to liaise between the 5. Would Greenham stay if Terry wasn't involved?