I find it somewhat strange there are two different consortiums.�Would it not be cheaper for them to all work together? Is there some reason some of them will not work with others? Do they have different vision for the club?�Still, at least it shows there is enough interest in what Terry has founded to assure us it will continue which�can only be good news.
If one of those rival consortia is who I think they are, I wouldn't let them clean my boots, let alone take care of the Nix.
That raises a whole new set of problems. Do you know if the "preferred" group are the ones, and only ones,�who have made contact with FFA? Another issue would be if a group was highly respected but wanted to move to a different city or "share" the games around�and rebrand as the New Zealand Phoenix.�If�a group that was�undesirable was to�make Terry an offer to actually buy the licence this could turn out�quite badly.
Not much to it, just some names floating around who I wouldn't want to be associated with the Phoenix.