Post history

History for james dean

Phoenix Ownership - Rob says FTFFA (Part 1)

Back to topic

Current version

Posted September 12, 2011 13:08 · last edited March 18, 2021 07:33

The one thing I would add is that this is not an opportunity to make money unless you run the club really well i.e. increase crowds and income massively.  There has to be some kind of altruistic desire to get involved because this is not really a money making venture at this stage.
 
If the club is run really well and people can in fact make money then that is a good thing isn't it?  There are no assets to strip, I'm not sure what "unfavourable" agenda owners could take - other than moving a load of games out of wellington or the club altogether, but I think a wholesale move is extremely unlikely.  The whole point of this exercise seems to be keeping the club in Wellington

Previous versions

1 version
Unknown editor edited March 18, 2021 07:33

The one thing I would add is that this is not an opportunity to make money unless you run the club really well i.e. increase crowds and income massively.  There has to be some kind of altruistic desire to get involved because this is not really a money making venture at this stage.

 
If the club is run really well and people can in fact make money then that is a good thing isn't it?  There are no assets to strip, I'm not sure what "unfavourable" agenda owners could take - other than moving a load of games out of wellington or the club altogether, but I think a wholesale move is extremely unlikely.  The whole point of this exercise seems to be keeping the club in Wellington