The circular argument never ends.
PRIMA: "The Nix can't recruit because of Terry's money worries."
SECUNDA: "The Nix has recruited Pantelis, Satellite, etc"
PRIMA: "The Nix can't recruit because of Terry's money worries."
SECUNDA: "The Nix has recruited Pantelis, Satellite, etc"
A little too simplified?
Surely the argument would be the quality of recruitment (knowing we need 3 more players to meet minimum squad size and who knows the awesome we could sign. And I am reasonably happy with our recruits BTW). Saying that we have signed players is like saying we have signed ~40 players on minimum wage, so since we signed 40 players we must be far from financial difficulty.
I think there has been some 'coveting they neighbours Kewell/Emo etc....' going on.