There you go Worthington - you can actually write a balanced, unemotive article (I note yesterday's tw*t job was taken off the net in the evening).
So now that I can be bothered to look at the actual substance of the article I question why NZF has had only 'cursory' discussions when the deadline is seemingly Monday. One would assume that if a back-up consortium was in the wings there would be quite a bit of discussion and detail surely (although I accept that nothing would be 'pen to paper' at this stage)?
There you go Worthington - you can actually write a balanced, unemotive article (I note yesterday's tw*t job was taken off the net in the evening).
So now that I can be bothered to look at the actual substance of the article I question why NZF has had only 'cursory' discussions when the deadline is seemingly Monday. One would assume that if a back-up consortium was in the wings there would be quite a bit of discussion and detail surely (although I accept that nothing would be 'pen to paper' at this stage)?