I don't get the claim that we got rid of Ernie too soon, because we were terrible last season too. And half a season before that. He'd had almost two years of toothless football with disappointing results when he left, without really trying to change anything fundamental about our tactics. And he wanted to resign anyway. And he's to blame for our unbalanced squad and over-reliance on Krishna's goals.
Where does the idea he was going to turn it around come from?