Just applying logic here. Every news piece i have read about McKain has went on about how much of a world class DEFENDER he is. He has played in the midfield but he is quoted as saying he prefers playing in the defence. Meaning we already have a great back 4, if we can shift Mckain to a right fullback role. I really dont see how people could say Karl Dodd could play on the right, he has no attacking attributes whatsoever and is a class CB. Him and Durante will be the best pairing in the A-League.
Except that there is no logic there.
Karl Dodd has played RB in the past, McKain has not (instead having played CB and CDM). So where is your logic?
In short, you're an idiot.
edit - Jaza - if you had any confidence in the strength of your argument, why would you bother to call someone an idiot - how about using ideas not abuse to make your point
cool a schizophrenic!