Post history

History for Guests

Phoenix Transfer - speculation (Part 1)

Back to topic

Current version

Posted January 27, 2009 09:06 · last edited March 18, 2021 07:44

Signing a player at that age is exactly what the Knights would have done. We don't need to go down that road.

When you consider we are very light on strikers and they just let Covs go (aged 37?) and are saying they wont resign Johnson due to age and a required knee reconstruction, they are very unlikely to sign a 35 yo player. Its basically wasting an import spot to an aged player. Lets not waste an import spot on an aged player.

Previous versions

1 version
Unknown editor edited March 18, 2021 07:44

Signing a player at that age is exactly what the Knights would have done. We don't need to go down that road.

When you consider we are very light on strikers and they just let Covs go (aged 37?) and are saying they wont resign Johnson due to age and a required knee reconstruction, they are very unlikely to sign a 35 yo player. Its basically wasting an import spot to an aged player. Lets not waste an import spot on an aged player.