Current version

Posted August 09, 2013 11:25 · last edited August 09, 2013 11:46

whatever JV

you equate open minded with weak

you equate a willingness to think of a range of possibilities as pessimistic

I don't need or aim to be right, I am quite happy to see the possibility that Cunningham might not work out and to suggest if that were the case what the outcome would be

if you think that is weak and pessimistic, then fine that is your world view

it's not mine

if you cannot handle someone suggesting that something is not a certainty and want to argue that it is, that's fine, you are entitled to your opinion.  I would just suggest in that circumstance you don't go throwing around insults about weakness and pessimism or you just might be perceived as an arrogant rooster

Previous versions

2 versions
mjp2 edited August 09, 2013 11:46
Jeff Vader wrote:
ha you crack me up. I'll give you that much.

B: the reality is, you made it personal. I don't really care but you only do that if you are carrying nothing. Deflecting I think it's called.


lets just remember who was the first to say

"I choose not to be a pessimist with this signing like other opinions. I'm not being weak and having a bob each way."

so if you think you were not the first to get personal, think again

the rest we've heard all before


mjp2 edited August 09, 2013 11:26
Jeff Vader wrote:
ha you crack me up. I'll give you that much.

B: the reality is, you made it personal. I don't really care but you only do that if you are carrying nothing. Deflecting I think it's called.


lets just remember who was the first to say

"I choose not to be a pessimist with this signing like other opinions. I'm not being weak and having a bob each way."

so if you think you were not the first to get personal, think again

the rest we've heard all before