Post history

History for Warwick Hunt

R1 vs Newcastle Jets | 7pm Sun 11th Oct | 12pm Backbencher

Back to topic

Current version

Posted October 07, 2015 08:06 · last edited October 07, 2015 19:22

<Self-edit> Talking more bollocks than usual :-) 

Previous versions

19 versions
Warwick Hunt edited October 07, 2015 19:22

<Self-edit>

Warwick Hunt edited October 07, 2015 19:18

I'm unconvinced that there are any other formations in modern football, apart from the classic 4-4-2 and 4-3-3

The other formations come from 'variations' of these structures depending on the strengths/weanesses of a team's defenders, midfielders, attackers and even false-9s :-) 

If you have an especially mobile defender, midfielder or attacker then other formations fall easily from these classic structures as a player or players freely adapt team tactics by playing in front or behind these classic lines on attack and react to the opposition on defence.

The biggest failing of the Phoenix since our inaugural season, in my opinion, has been the inability to consistently spread the game across the width of the pitch in defence, midfield and attack, whatever formation has been deployed.

Warwick Hunt edited October 07, 2015 09:07

I'm unconvinced that there are any other formations in modern football, apart from the classic 4-4-2 and 4-3-3

The other formations come from 'variations' of these structures depending on the strengths of a team's defenders, midfielders, attackers and even false-9s :-) 

If you have an especially mobile defender, midfielder or attacker then other formations fall easily from these classic structures as a player or players freely adapt team tactics by playing in front or behind these classic lines on attack and react to the opposition on defence.

The biggest failing of the Phoenix since our inaugural season, in my opinion, has been the inability to consistently spread the game across the width of the pitch in defence, midfield and attack, whatever formation has been deployed.

Warwick Hunt edited October 07, 2015 09:06

I'm unconvinced that there are any other formations in modern football, apart from the classic 4-4-2 and 4-3-3

The other formations come from 'variations' of these structures depending on the strengths of the team's defenders, midfielders, attackers and even false-9s :-) 

If you have an especially mobile defender, midfielder or attacker then other formations fall easily from these classic structures as a player or players freely adapt team tactics by playing in front or behind these classic lines on attack and react to the opposition on defence.

The biggest failing of the Phoenix since our inaugural season, in my opinion, has been the inability to consistently spread the game across the width of the pitch in defence, midfield and attack, whatever formation has been deployed.

Warwick Hunt edited October 07, 2015 08:19

I'm unconvinced that there are any other formations in modern football, apart from the classic 4-4-2 and 4-3-3

The other formations come from 'variations' of these structures depending on the strengths of the team's defenders, midfielders, attackers and even false-9s :-) 

If you have an especially mobile defender, midfielder or attacker then other formations fall easily from these classic structures as a player or players freely adapt team tactics by playing in front or behind these classic lines on attack and react to the opposition on defence.

The biggest failing of the Phoenix, since our inaugural season, has been the inability to consistently spread the game across the width of the pitch in defence, midfield and attack, whatever formation has been deployed.

Warwick Hunt edited October 07, 2015 08:17

I'm unconvinced that there are any other formations in modern football, apart from the classic 4-4-2 and 4-3-3

The other formations come from 'variations' of these structures depending on the strengths of the team's defenders, midfielders, attackers and even false-9s :-) 

If you have an especially mobile defender, midfielder or attacker then other formations fall easily from these classic structures as a player or players freely adapt team tactics by playing in front or behind these classic lines on attack and adapt to the opposition on defence.

The biggest failing of the Phoenix, since our inaugural season, has been the inability to consistently spread the game across the width of the pitch in defence, midfield and attack, whatever formation has been deployed.

Warwick Hunt edited October 07, 2015 08:16

I'm unconvinced that there are any other formations in modern football, apart from the classic 4-4-2 and 4-3-3

The other formations come from 'variations' of these structures depending on the strengths of the team's defenders, midfielders, attackers and even false-9s :-) 

If you have an especially mobile defender, midfielder or attacker then other formations fall easily from these classic structures as a player or players freely adapt team tactics by playing in front or behind these classic lines on attack and adapt to the opposition on defence.

The biggest failing of the Phoenix, since our inaugural season, has been the inability to consistently spread the game across the width of the pitch in defence, midfield and attack, whatever formation has been deployed.

Warwick Hunt edited October 07, 2015 08:16

I'm unconvinced that there are any other formations in modern football, apart from the classic 4-4-2 and 4-3-3

The other formations come from 'variations' of these structures depending on the strengths of the team's defenders, midfielders, attackers and even false-9s :-) 

If you have an especially mobile defender, midfielder or attacker then other formations fall easily from these classic structures as a player or players freely adapt team tactics by playing in front or behind these classic lines on attack and adapt to the opposition on defence.

The biggest consistent failing of the Phoenix, since our iinaugural season, has been the inability to consistently spread the game across the width of the pitch in defence, midfield and attack, whatever formation has been deployed.

Warwick Hunt edited October 07, 2015 08:15

I'm unconvinced that there are any other formations in modern football, apart from the classic 4-4-2 and 4-3-3

The other formations come from 'variations' of these structures depending on the strengths of the team's defenders, midfielders, attackers and even false-9s :-) 

If you have an especially mobile defender, midfielder or attacker then other formations fall easily from these classic structures as a player or players freely adapt team tactics by playing in front or behind these classic lines on attack and adapt to the opposition on defence.

The biggest consistent failing of the Phoenix, since our iinaugural season, has been the inability to consistently spread the game across the width of the pitch in defence, midfield and attack, whatever formation has been deployed.

Warwick Hunt edited October 07, 2015 08:15

I'm unconvinced that there are any other formations in modern football, apart from the classic 4-4-2 and 4-3-3

The other formations come from 'variations' of these structures depending on the strengths of the team's defenders, midfielders, attackers and even false-9s :-) 

If you have an especially mobile defender, midfielder or attacker then other formations fall easily from these classic structures as a player or players freely adapt team tactics by playing in front or behind these classic lines on attack and adapt to the opposition on defence.

The biggest consistent failing of the Phoenix, since our iinaugural season, has been the inability to consistently spread the game across the width of the pitch in defence, midfield and attack, whatever formation has been deployed.

Warwick Hunt edited October 07, 2015 08:15

I'm unconvinced that there are any other formations in modern football, apart from the classic 4-4-2 and 4-3-3

The other formations come from variations of these structures depending on the strengths of the team's defenders, midfielders, attackers and even false-9s :-) 

If you have an especially mobile defender, midfielder or attacker then other formations fall easily from these classic structures as a player or players freely adapt team tactics by playing in front or behind these classic lines on attack and adapt to the opposition on defence.

The biggest consistent failing of the Phoenix, since our iinaugural season, has been the inability to consistently spread the game across the width of the pitch in defence, midfield and attack, whatever formation has been deployed.

Warwick Hunt edited October 07, 2015 08:13

I'm unconvinced that there are any other formations in modern football, apart from the classic 4-4-2 and 4-3-3

The other formations come from variations of these structures depending on the strengths of the team's defenders, midfielders, attackers and even false-9s :-) 

If you have an especially mobile defender, midfielder or attacker then other formations fall easily from these classic structures as a player or players freely adapt team tactics by playing in front or behind these classic formations on attack and adapt to the opposition on defence.

The biggest consistent failing of the Phoenix, since our iinaugural season, has been the inability to consistently spread the game across the width of the pitch in defence, midfield and attack, whatever formation has been deployed.

Warwick Hunt edited October 07, 2015 08:12

I'm unconvinced that there are any other formations in modern football, apart from the classic 4-4-2 and 4-3-3

The other formations come from variations of these structures depending on the strengths of the team's defenders, midfielders, attackers and even false-9s :-) 

If you have an especially mobile defender, midfielder or attacker then other formations fall easily from these classic formations as a player or players freely adapt team tactics by playing in front or behind these classic formations on attack and adapt to the opposition on defence.

The biggest consistent failing of the Phoenix, since our iinaugural season, has been the inability to consistently spread the game across the width of the pitch in defence, midfield and attack, whatever formation has been deployed.

Warwick Hunt edited October 07, 2015 08:11

I'm unconvinced that there are any other formations in modern football, apart from the classic 4-4-2 and 4-3-3

The other formations come from these structures depending on the strengths of the team's defenders, midfielders, attackers and even false-9s :-) 

If you have an especially mobile defender, midfielder or attacker then other formations fall easily from these classic formations as a player or players freely adapt team tactics by playing in front or behind these classic formations on attack and adapt to the opposition on defence.

The biggest consistent failing of the Phoenix, since our iinaugural season, has been the inability to consistently spread the game across the width of the pitch in defence, midfield and attack, whatever formation has been deployed.

Warwick Hunt edited October 07, 2015 08:10

I'm unconvinced that there are any other formations in modern football, apart from 4-4-2 and 4-3-3


The other formations come from these structures depending on the strengths of the team's defenders, midfielders, attackers and even false-9s :-) 

If you have an especially mobile defender, midfielder or attacker then other formations fall easily from these classic formations as a player or players freely adapt team tactics by playing in front or behind these classic formations on attack and adapt to the opposition on defence.

The biggest consistent failing of the Phoenix, since our iinaugural season, has been the inability to consistently spread the game across the width of the pitch in defence, midfield and attack, whatever formation has been deployed.

Warwick Hunt edited October 07, 2015 08:10

I'm unconvinced that there are no other formations in modern football, apart from 4-4-2 and 4-3-3


The other formations come from these structures depending on the strengths of the team's defenders, midfielders, attackers and even false-9s :-) 

If you have an especially mobile defender, midfielder or attacker then other formations fall easily from these classic formations as a player or players freely adapt team tactics by playing in front or behind these classic formations on attack and adapt to the opposition on defence.

The biggest consistent failing of the Phoenix, since our iinaugural season, has been the inability to consistently spread the game across the width of the pitch in defence, midfield and attack, whatever formation has been deployed.

Warwick Hunt edited October 07, 2015 08:09

I'm unconvinced that there's any other formations other than 4-4-2 and 4-3-3 in modern football

The other formations come from these structures depending on the strengths of the team's defenders, midfielders, attackers and even false-9s :-) 

If you have an especially mobile defender, midfielder or attacker then other formations fall easily from these classic formations as a player or players freely adapt team tactics by playing in front or behind these classic formations on attack and adapt to the opposition on defence.

The biggest consistent failing of the Phoenix, since our iinaugural season, has been the inability to consistently spread the game across the width of the pitch in defence, midfield and attack, whatever formation has been deployed.

Warwick Hunt edited October 07, 2015 08:07

I'm unconvinced that there's any other formations other than 4-4-2 and 4-4-3 in modern football

The other formations come from these structures depending on the strengths of the team's defenders, midfielders, attackers and even false-9s :-) 

If you have an especially mobile defender, midfielder or attacker then other formations fall easily from these classic formations as a player or players freely adapt team tactics by playing in front or behind these classic formations on attack and adapt to the opposition on defence.

The biggest consistent failing of the Phoenix, since our iinaugural season, has been the inability to consistently spread the game across the width of the pitch in defence, midfield and attack, whatever formation has been deployed.

Warwick Hunt edited October 07, 2015 08:07

Setting myself up for abuse by this post

I'm unconvinced that there's any other formations other than 4-4-2 and 4-4-3 in modern football

The other formations come from these structures depending on the strengths of the team's defenders, midfielders, attackers and even false-9s :-) 

If you have an especially mobile defender, midfielder or attacker then other formations fall easily from these classic formations as a player or players freely adapt team tactics by playing in front or behind these classic formations on attack and adapt to the opposition on defence.

The biggest consistent failing of the Phoenix, since our iinaugural season, has been the inability to consistently spread the game across the width of the pitch in defence, midfield and attack, whatever formation has been deployed.