Current version

Posted February 16, 2020 09:24 · last edited February 16, 2020 23:23

james dean wrote:

that was a good win,, our attack can be a bit sterile but our defence is very good. Wasn't as impressed with TAHW as some, I thought his passing was noticeably wayward in the period before he went off. Also thought Steinmann was bypassed too easily on their inside left channel where there was a lot of space. I think we're starting to see what Hooper is capable of. 

I saw that too, but I thought that was because of Payne's absence and lack of natural understanding between Steiny and TAHW. Bound to happen when you have personnel changes.

Previous versions

2 versions
Unknown editor edited February 16, 2020 23:23
james dean wrote:

that was a good win,, our attack can be a bit sterile but our defence is very good. Wasn't as impressed with TAHW as some, I thought his passing was noticeably wayward in the period before he went off. Also thought Steinmann was bypassed too easily on their inside left channel where there was a lot of space. I think we're starting to see what Hooper is capable of. 

I saw that too, but I thought that was because Payne's absence and lack of natural understanding between Steiny and TAHW. Bound to happen when you have a personnel change.

Unknown editor edited February 16, 2020 09:24
james dean wrote:

that was a good win,, our attack can be a bit sterile but our defence is very good. Wasn't as impressed with TAHW as some, I thought his passing was noticeably wayward in the period before he went off. Also thought Steinmann was bypassed too easily on their inside left channel where there was a lot of space. I think we're starting to see what Hooper is capable of. 

I saw that too, but I thought that was because Payne's absence and lack of understanding between Steiny and TAHW.