Post history

History for Blew.2

R26 vs Sydney FC | Sat 8th April | 7:35pm | ROF

Back to topic

Current version

Posted April 09, 2017 22:34 · last edited April 09, 2017 22:36

ConanTroutman wrote:

Blew.2 wrote:

ConanTroutman wrote:

Blew.2 wrote:

Now we know how much Gillet loves the Phoenix. But for VAR to work they have to consider the first offence. Hand of Sydney player is attached to Rossi's jersey and is climbing on him  VAR free kick to Phoenix, NO it's Gillet - did not see that in slow motion. Hence Evans is walking back to Nix goal as soon as whistle is blown for offside.  (Follow on in slowmo and you see Rossi pulled backward and arm comes up)

According to Patrick the VAR can only rule on the handball though, they aren't allowed to rule on the foul from the attacking player. Which is fudgeing retarded

So if it was not in his jurisdiction to rule on the foul why did Gillet bring up the hand ball (Balance of fairness).  Next we will be getting penalties from an Offside player being fouled in the box.

Because he HAS to make the call re: the handball as part of his mandate. Not making the call because of the attacking foul is exactly what he isn't allowed to do.

  So he calls "Refs call stands"  Ref's decision was balanced and with all facts as he saw it correct and not an obvious error.  (But it was Shaver on the review)

Previous versions

1 version
Unknown editor edited April 09, 2017 22:36
ConanTroutman wrote:
Blew.2 wrote:
ConanTroutman wrote:
Blew.2 wrote:

Now we know how much Gillet loves the Phoenix. But for VAR to work they have to consider the first offence. Hand of Sydney player is attached to Rossi's jersey and is climbing on him  VAR free kick to Phoenix, NO it's Gillet - did not see that in slow motion. Hence Evans is walking back to Nix goal as soon as whistle is blown for offside.  (Follow on in slowmo and you see Rossi pulled backward and arm comes up)

According to Patrick the VAR can only rule on the handball though, they aren't allowed to rule on the foul from the attacking player. Which is fudgeing retarded
So if it was not in his jurisdiction to rule on the foul why did Gillet bring up the hand ball (Balance of fairness).  Next we will be getting penalties from an Offside player being fouled in the box.
Because he HAS to make the call re: the handball as part of his mandate. Not making the call because of the attacking foul is exactly what he isn't allowed to do.
  So he calls "Refs call stands"  Ref's decision was balanced and with all facts as he saw it correct and not an obvious error.