Posted October 25, 2016 09:47
· last edited October 25, 2016 09:48
the game didn't rest on this decision
the idea is to be good enough to influence the game to the point where it doesn't matter what outside influences may or may not come your way
Yes, it did. This is such a dumb thing to say. If we had scored, having been the best team throughout the match, this could have sunk Sydney's morale and then they would've gotten nothing or drawn 1-all considering they had just played a midweek fixture. We would've gotten something out of the match. I don't believe Sydney would've gone on to win the match if we had scored then; sure, it's a possibility, but that goal would've sunk them.
Your second sentence doesn't apply to a team like the Phoenix really. If Barcelona or Bayern Munich get one decision not go their way, sure they'll probably go on to win anyway. But a team like Phoenix any one decision will make or break whether they can get a result that week because we're not as good at putting our chances away, so if instead of 0 goals we get 1, yeah that's a massive difference that could've given us some points given how our defense has conceded less than the majority of A-League teams.
could have
would've
would've
don't believe
would've
possibility
would've
probably
could've
This barely merits a response but anyway. Don't you understand? We're a team of "could've, would've". Answer me this: if Sunderland get an offside not go their way which would've put Defoe one on one against Manchester City, would that not have had an influence on the whole game? Football is a low-scoring sport, scoring 1 goal often has a massive effect, especially when you're dominating against a team that had a midweek game and you didn't and are playing at home.
If you answer with another troll comment, I'm not gonna respond.