Post history

History for Seeing red

2017/18 Transfer Speculation

Back to topic

Current version

Posted July 21, 2017 01:16 · last edited July 21, 2017 01:17

kwlap wrote:

We have 3 starting mids in Goran, WeeMac and Gui, and 3 backups in Ridenton, Rufer, and Singh. Our backline has similar depth as well - the priority for investment has to be attacking players now.

see id still argue that our midfield is lacks depth. most of those players play the same position and most play attacking roles. Only one of them is defensive and none are the box to box style, unless Ridenton counts as one, which i don't think he does. it leaves our midfield without any engine or linking/transition players.

Rufer plays as a DM, and Ridenton can too. I think it also depends on how we want to play, both in terms of shape and tacical approach. I see us with a 4-3-3 or 4-2-3-1, with a tackler/screener (Goran/Rufer) and distributor (WeeMac/Ridenton) and a creator (Finkler/Singh). If we play a higher defensive line (might require dropping Dura) then our midfielders won't need to cover as much ground and the need for an A-Rod type of player while be reduced.

Of course it would be nice to have better backups but the balance of our midfield looks better than it did last year and most of the year before when we were trying to fit too many similar players on the pitch at once. I wouldn't be against investing more in it but only if we have money and spots left over after we get a striker.


When did Rufer become a DM? Last I checked he was an attacking midfielder.

Previous versions

1 version
Unknown editor edited July 21, 2017 01:17

When did Rufer become a DM? Last I checked he was an attacking midfielder.