Post history

History for AucklandPhoenix

The Protest Thread - 17th February and 25th March

Back to topic

Current version

Posted March 01, 2018 06:06 · last edited March 01, 2018 07:18

Nz_Dave wrote:

AucklandPhoenix wrote:

I guess he could Vader. That would be classy and arrogant would it not?

Look back on this thread Big fella and you will see other posts the same. They were not arrogant and neither was my post

If you couldn't get off your ass and protest then why should you know what Dome  said

If you are actually interested and believe in the issues then go next time and you might hear some answers 

Others also asked, they haven't shared it and if they wanted to they probably would have by now 

I believe one of them said you needed to be there 

So don't be a c big fella

No offence but that's ridiculous. If I acted with that described attitude in my dealings with the club imagine how furious people would be - and rightly so. Luckily most people are not of the same mind as you.

There are many reasons people are unable to get info direct from the source whether it be location or personal commitments. To suggest that people have to "step up" in order to have the right to simply ask for info is something I hope never becomes the attitude of the majority around here. 

If the protesters would rather keep that info to themselves that is their call but it certainly isn't your place to belittle people for asking about it.

/rant

Dave with all due respect as you seem a nice guy and balanced in your views, Patrick was at the location and apart from beating his own drum, had no personal commitments.

He made a conscious decision not to attend and apart from questioning LG about his statement that the area was roped off (when it wasn't) , didn't contribute 

He was also asked to support the thing and chose not to do so

If LG or the other two want to tell him then that's cool

The fact they haven't however illustrates that perhaps if he was interested in the issues and the response then he needed to be there.

Hatter himself said a few pages ago you needed to be there when asked. 

If one was not at the location (as I wasn't as I am in Auckland) and you actually believe in the issues and why they did what they did, you could message LG

I'm sure he would then share it with you

Previous versions

18 versions
Unknown editor edited March 01, 2018 07:18
Nz_Dave wrote:
AucklandPhoenix wrote:

I guess he could Vader. That would be classy and arrogant would it not?

Look back on this thread Big fella and you will see other posts the same. They were not arrogant and neither was my post

If you couldn't get off your ass and protest then why should you know what Dome  said

If you are actually interested and believe in the issues then go next time and you might hear some answers 

Others also asked, they haven't shared it and if they wanted to they probably would have by now 

I believe one of them said you needed to be there 

So don't be a c big fella

No offence but that's ridiculous. If I acted with that described attitude in my dealings with the club imagine how furious people would be - and rightly so. Luckily most people are not of the same mind as you.

There are many reasons people are unable to get info direct from the source whether it be location or personal commitments. To suggest that people have to "step up" in order to have the right to simply ask for info is something I hope never becomes the attitude of the majority around here. 

If the protesters would rather keep that info to themselves that is their call but it certainly isn't your place to belittle people for asking about it.

/rant

Dave with all due respect as you seem a nice guy and balanced in your views, Patrick was at the location and apart from beating his own drum, had no personal commitments.

He made a conscious decision not to attend and apart from questioning LG about his statement that the area was roped off (when it wasn't) , didn't contribute 

He was also asked to support the thing and chose not to do so

If LG or the other two want to tell him then that's cool

The fact they haven't however illustrates that perhaps if he was interested in the issues and the response then he needed to be there.

Hatter himself said a few pages ago you needed to be there when asked. 

If you reread the posts on this thread, people belittled them 

And they are going again

If one was not at the location (as I wasn't as I am in Auckland) and you actually believe in the issues and why they did what they did, you could message LG

I'm sure he would then share it with you

Unknown editor edited March 01, 2018 07:17
Nz_Dave wrote:
AucklandPhoenix wrote:

I guess he could Vader. That would be classy and arrogant would it not?

Look back on this thread Big fella and you will see other posts the same. They were not arrogant and neither was my post

If you couldn't get off your ass and protest then why should you know what Dome  said

If you are actually interested and believe in the issues then go next time and you might hear some answers 

Others also asked, they haven't shared it and if they wanted to they probably would have by now 

I believe one of them said you needed to be there 

So don't be a c big fella

No offence but that's ridiculous. If I acted with that described attitude in my dealings with the club imagine how furious people would be - and rightly so. Luckily most people are not of the same mind as you.

There are many reasons people are unable to get info direct from the source whether it be location or personal commitments. To suggest that people have to "step up" in order to have the right to simply ask for info is something I hope never becomes the attitude of the majority around here. 

If the protesters would rather keep that info to themselves that is their call but it certainly isn't your place to belittle people for asking about it.

/rant

Dave with all due respect as you seem a nice guy and balanced in your views, Patrick was at the location and apart from beating his own drum, had no personal commitments.

He made a conscious decision not to attend and apart from questioning LG about his statement that the area was roped off (when it wasn't) , didn't contribute 

He was also asked to support the thing and chose not to do so

If LG or the other two want to tell him then that's cool

The fact they haven't however illustrates that perhaps if he was interested in the issues and the response then he needed to be there.

Hatter himself said a few pages ago you needed to be there when asked. 

If you reread the posts on this thread, people belittled them 

If one was not at the location (as I wasn't as I am in Auckland) and you actually believe in the issues and why they did what they did, you could message LG

I'm sure he would then share it with you

Unknown editor edited March 01, 2018 07:16
Nz_Dave wrote:
AucklandPhoenix wrote:

I guess he could Vader. That would be classy and arrogant would it not?

Look back on this thread Big fella and you will see other posts the same. They were not arrogant and neither was my post

If you couldn't get off your ass and protest then why should you know what Dome  said

If you are actually interested and believe in the issues then go next time and you might hear some answers 

Others also asked, they haven't shared it and if they wanted to they probably would have by now 

I believe one of them said you needed to be there 

So don't be a c big fella

No offence but that's ridiculous. If I acted with that described attitude in my dealings with the club imagine how furious people would be - and rightly so. Luckily most people are not of the same mind as you.

There are many reasons people are unable to get info direct from the source whether it be location or personal commitments. To suggest that people have to "step up" in order to have the right to simply ask for info is something I hope never becomes the attitude of the majority around here. 

If the protesters would rather keep that info to themselves that is their call but it certainly isn't your place to belittle people for asking about it.

/rant

Dave with all due respect as you seem a nice guy and balanced in your views, Patrick was at the location and apart from beating his own drum, had no personal commitments.

He made a conscious decision not to attend and apart from questioning LG about his statement that the area was roped off (when it wasn't) , didn't contribute 

He was also asked to support the thing and chose not to do so

If LG or the other two want to tell him then that's cool

The fact they haven't however illustrates that perhaps if he was interested in the issues and the response then he needed to be there.

Hatter himself said a few pages ago you needed to be there when asked. 

If one was not at the location (as I wasn't as I am in Auckland) and you actually believe in the issues and why they did what they did, you could message LG

I'm sure he would then share it with you

Unknown editor edited March 01, 2018 06:38
Nz_Dave wrote:
AucklandPhoenix wrote:

I guess he could Vader. That would be classy and arrogant would it not?

Look back on this thread Big fella and you will see other posts the same. They were not arrogant and neither was my post

If you couldn't get off your ass and protest then why should you know what Dome  said

If you are actually interested and believe in the issues then go next time and you might hear some answers 

Others also asked, they haven't shared it and if they wanted to they probably would have by now 

I believe one of them said you needed to be there 

So don't be a c big fella

No offence but that's ridiculous. If I acted with that described attitude in my dealings with the club imagine how furious people would be - and rightly so. Luckily most people are not of the same mind as you.

There are many reasons people are unable to get info direct from the source whether it be location or personal commitments. To suggest that people have to "step up" in order to have the right to simply ask for info is something I hope never becomes the attitude of the majority around here. 

If the protesters would rather keep that info to themselves that is their call but it certainly isn't your place to belittle people for asking about it.

/rant

Dave with all due respect as you seem a nice guy and balanced in your views, Patrick was at the location and apart from beating his own drum, had no personal commitments.

He made a conscious decision not to attend and apart from questioning LG about his statement that the area was roped off (when it wasn't) , didn't contribute 

He was also asked to support the thing and chose not to do so

If LG or the other two want to tell him then that's cool

The fact they haven't however illustrates that perhaps if he was interested in the issues and the response then he needed to be there.

Hatter himself said a few pages ago you needed to be there when asked 

If one was not at the location (as I wasn't as I am in Auckland) and you actually believe in the issues and why they did what they did, you could message LG

I'm sure he would then share it with you

Unknown editor edited March 01, 2018 06:37
Nz_Dave wrote:
AucklandPhoenix wrote:

I guess he could Vader. That would be classy and arrogant would it not?

Look back on this thread Big fella and you will see other posts the same. They were not arrogant and neither was my post

If you couldn't get off your ass and protest then why should you know what Dome  said

If you are actually interested and believe in the issues then go next time and you might hear some answers 

Others also asked, they haven't shared it and if they wanted to they probably would have by now 

I believe one of them said you needed to be there 

So don't be a c big fella

No offence but that's ridiculous. If I acted with that described attitude in my dealings with the club imagine how furious people would be - and rightly so. Luckily most people are not of the same mind as you.

There are many reasons people are unable to get info direct from the source whether it be location or personal commitments. To suggest that people have to "step up" in order to have the right to simply ask for info is something I hope never becomes the attitude of the majority around here. 

If the protesters would rather keep that info to themselves that is their call but it certainly isn't your place to belittle people for asking about it.

/rant

Dave with all due respect as you seem a nice guy and balanced in your views, Patrick was at the location and apart from beating his own drum, had no personal commitments.

He made a conscious decision not to attend and apart from questioning LG about his statement that the area was roped off (when it wasn't) , didn't contribute 

He was also asked to support the thing and chose not to do so

If LG or the other two want to tell him then that's cool

The fact they haven't however illustrates that perhaps if he was interested in the issues and the response then he needed to be there.

Hatter said a few pages ago you needed to be there to have heard what was said 

If one was not at the location (as I wasn't as I am in Auckland) and you actually believe in the issues and why they did what they did, you could message LG

I'm sure he would then share it with you

Unknown editor edited March 01, 2018 06:35
Nz_Dave wrote:
AucklandPhoenix wrote:

I guess he could Vader. That would be classy and arrogant would it not?

Look back on this thread Big fella and you will see other posts the same. They were not arrogant and neither was my post

If you couldn't get off your ass and protest then why should you know what Dome  said

If you are actually interested and believe in the issues then go next time and you might hear some answers 

Others also asked, they haven't shared it and if they wanted to they probably would have by now 

I believe one of them said you needed to be there 

So don't be a c big fella

No offence but that's ridiculous. If I acted with that described attitude in my dealings with the club imagine how furious people would be - and rightly so. Luckily most people are not of the same mind as you.

There are many reasons people are unable to get info direct from the source whether it be location or personal commitments. To suggest that people have to "step up" in order to have the right to simply ask for info is something I hope never becomes the attitude of the majority around here. 

If the protesters would rather keep that info to themselves that is their call but it certainly isn't your place to belittle people for asking about it.

/rant

Dave with all due respect as you seem a nice guy and balanced in your views, Patrick was at the location and apart from beating his own drum, had no personal commitments.

He made a conscious decision not to attend and apart from questioning LG about his statement that the area was roped off (when it wasn't) , didn't contribute 

He was also asked to support the thing and chose not to do so

If LG or the other two want to tell him then that's cool

The fact they haven't however illustrates that perhaps if he was interested in the issues and the response then he needed to be there.

Hatter said a few pages ago you needed to be there to have heard what was said 

If one was not at the location (as I wasn't as I am in Auckland) and you actually believe in the issues and why they did what they did, you could message LG

Unknown editor edited March 01, 2018 06:35
Nz_Dave wrote:
AucklandPhoenix wrote:

I guess he could Vader. That would be classy and arrogant would it not?

Look back on this thread Big fella and you will see other posts the same. They were not arrogant and neither was my post

If you couldn't get off your ass and protest then why should you know what Dome  said

If you are actually interested and believe in the issues then go next time and you might hear some answers 

Others also asked, they haven't shared it and if they wanted to they probably would have by now 

I believe one of them said you needed to be there 

So don't be a c big fella

No offence but that's ridiculous. If I acted with that described attitude in my dealings with the club imagine how furious people would be - and rightly so. Luckily most people are not of the same mind as you.

There are many reasons people are unable to get info direct from the source whether it be location or personal commitments. To suggest that people have to "step up" in order to have the right to simply ask for info is something I hope never becomes the attitude of the majority around here. 

If the protesters would rather keep that info to themselves that is their call but it certainly isn't your place to belittle people for asking about it.

/rant

Dave with all due respect as you seem a nice guy and balanced in your views, Patrick was at the location and apart from beating his own drum, had no personal commitments.

He made a conscious decision not to attend and apart from questioning LG about his statement that the area was roped off (when it wasn't) , didn't contribute 

He was also asked to support the thing and chose not to do so

If LG or the other two want to tell him then that's cool

The fact they haven't however illustrates that perhaps if he was interested in the issues and the response then he needed to be there.

Hatter said a few pages ago you needed to be there to have heard what we said 

If one was not at the location (as I wasn't as I am in Auckland) and you actually believe in the issues and why they did what they did, you could message LG

Unknown editor edited March 01, 2018 06:34
Nz_Dave wrote:
AucklandPhoenix wrote:

I guess he could Vader. That would be classy and arrogant would it not?

Look back on this thread Big fella and you will see other posts the same. They were not arrogant and neither was my post

If you couldn't get off your ass and protest then why should you know what Dome  said

If you are actually interested and believe in the issues then go next time and you might hear some answers 

Others also asked, they haven't shared it and if they wanted to they probably would have by now 

I believe one of them said you needed to be there 

So don't be a c big fella

No offence but that's ridiculous. If I acted with that described attitude in my dealings with the club imagine how furious people would be - and rightly so. Luckily most people are not of the same mind as you.

There are many reasons people are unable to get info direct from the source whether it be location or personal commitments. To suggest that people have to "step up" in order to have the right to simply ask for info is something I hope never becomes the attitude of the majority around here. 

If the protesters would rather keep that info to themselves that is their call but it certainly isn't your place to belittle people for asking about it.

/rant

Dave with all due respect as you seem a nice guy and balanced in your views, Patrick was at the location and apart from beating his own drum, had no personal commitments.

He made a conscious decision not to attend and apart from questioning LG about his statement that the area was roped off (when it wasn't) , didn't contribute 

He was also asked to support the thing and chose not to do so

If LG or the other two want to tell him then that's cool

The fact they haven't however illustrates that perhaps if he was interested in the issues and the response then he needed to be there.

Hatter said a few pages ago you needed to be there to have heard what we said and good on him

If one was not at the location (as I wasn't as I am in Auckland) and you actually believe in the issues and why they did what they did, you could message LG

Unknown editor edited March 01, 2018 06:33
Nz_Dave wrote:
AucklandPhoenix wrote:

I guess he could Vader. That would be classy and arrogant would it not?

Look back on this thread Big fella and you will see other posts the same. They were not arrogant and neither was my post

If you couldn't get off your ass and protest then why should you know what Dome  said

If you are actually interested and believe in the issues then go next time and you might hear some answers 

Others also asked, they haven't shared it and if they wanted to they probably would have by now 

I believe one of them said you needed to be there 

So don't be a c big fella

No offence but that's ridiculous. If I acted with that described attitude in my dealings with the club imagine how furious people would be - and rightly so. Luckily most people are not of the same mind as you.

There are many reasons people are unable to get info direct from the source whether it be location or personal commitments. To suggest that people have to "step up" in order to have the right to simply ask for info is something I hope never becomes the attitude of the majority around here. 

If the protesters would rather keep that info to themselves that is their call but it certainly isn't your place to belittle people for asking about it.

/rant

Dave with all due respect as you seem a nice guy and balanced in your views, Patrick was at the location and apart from beating his own drum, had no personal commitments.

He made a conscious decision not to attend and apart from questioning LG about his statement that the area was roped off (when it wasn't) , didn't contribute 

He was also asked to support the thing and chose not to do so

If LG or the other two want to tell him then that's cool

The fact they haven't however illustrates that perhaps if he was interested in the issues and the response then he needed to be there.

Hatter said a few pages ago you needed to be there to have heard what we said and good on him

If one was not at the location (as I wasn't as I am in Auckland) and you actually believe in the issues and why they did what they did, you could message LG

Unknown editor edited March 01, 2018 06:33
Nz_Dave wrote:
AucklandPhoenix wrote:

I guess he could Vader. That would be classy and arrogant would it not?

Look back on this thread Big fella and you will see other posts the same. They were not arrogant and neither was my post

If you couldn't get off your ass and protest then why should you know what Dome  said

If you are actually interested and believe in the issues then go next time and you might hear some answers 

Others also asked, they haven't shared it and if they wanted to they probably would have by now 

I believe one of them said you needed to be there 

So don't be a c big fella

No offence but that's ridiculous. If I acted with that described attitude in my dealings with the club imagine how furious people would be - and rightly so. Luckily most people are not of the same mind as you.

There are many reasons people are unable to get info direct from the source whether it be location or personal commitments. To suggest that people have to "step up" in order to have the right to simply ask for info is something I hope never becomes the attitude of the majority around here. 

If the protesters would rather keep that info to themselves that is their call but it certainly isn't your place to belittle people for asking about it.

/rant

Dave with all due respect as you seem a nice guy and balanced in your views, Patrick was at the location and apart from beating his own drum, had no personal commitments.

He made a conscious decision not to attend and apart from questioning LG about his statement that the area was roped off (when it wasn't) , didn't contribute 

He was also asked to lead the thing and chose not to do so

If LG or the other two want to tell him then that's cool

The fact they haven't however illustrates that perhaps if he was interested in the issues and the response then he needed to be there.

Hatter said a few pages ago you needed to be there to have heard what we said and good on him

If one was not at the location (as I wasn't as I am in Auckland) and you actually believe in the issues and why they did what they did, you could message LG

Unknown editor edited March 01, 2018 06:32
Nz_Dave wrote:
AucklandPhoenix wrote:

I guess he could Vader. That would be classy and arrogant would it not?

Look back on this thread Big fella and you will see other posts the same. They were not arrogant and neither was my post

If you couldn't get off your ass and protest then why should you know what Dome  said

If you are actually interested and believe in the issues then go next time and you might hear some answers 

Others also asked, they haven't shared it and if they wanted to they probably would have by now 

I believe one of them said you needed to be there 

So don't be a c big fella

No offence but that's ridiculous. If I acted with that described attitude in my dealings with the club imagine how furious people would be - and rightly so. Luckily most people are not of the same mind as you.

There are many reasons people are unable to get info direct from the source whether it be location or personal commitments. To suggest that people have to "step up" in order to have the right to simply ask for info is something I hope never becomes the attitude of the majority around here. 

If the protesters would rather keep that info to themselves that is their call but it certainly isn't your place to belittle people for asking about it.

/rant

Dave with all due respect as you seem a nice guy and balanced in your views, Patrick was at the location and apart from beating his own drum, had no personal commitments.

He made a conscious decision not to attend and apart from questioning LG about his statement that the area was roped off (when it wasn't) , didn't contribute 

If LG or the other two want to tell him then that's cool

The fact they haven't however illustrates that perhaps if he was interested in the issues and the response then he needed to be there.

Hatter said a few pages ago you needed to be there to have heard what we said and good on him

If one was not at the location (as I wasn't as I am in Auckland) and you actually believe in the issues and why they did what they did, you could message LG

Unknown editor edited March 01, 2018 06:32
Nz_Dave wrote:
AucklandPhoenix wrote:

I guess he could Vader. That would be classy and arrogant would it not?

Look back on this thread Big fella and you will see other posts the same. They were not arrogant and neither was my post

If you couldn't get off your ass and protest then why should you know what Dome  said

If you are actually interested and believe in the issues then go next time and you might hear some answers 

Others also asked, they haven't shared it and if they wanted to they probably would have by now 

I believe one of them said you needed to be there 

So don't be a c big fella

No offence but that's ridiculous. If I acted with that described attitude in my dealings with the club imagine how furious people would be - and rightly so. Luckily most people are not of the same mind as you.

There are many reasons people are unable to get info direct from the source whether it be location or personal commitments. To suggest that people have to "step up" in order to have the right to simply ask for info is something I hope never becomes the attitude of the majority around here. 

If the protesters would rather keep that info to themselves that is their call but it certainly isn't your place to belittle people for asking about it.

/rant

Dave with all due respect as you seem a nice guy and balanced in your views, Patrick was at the location and apart from beating his own drum, had no personal commitments.

He made a conscious decision not to attend and apart from questioning LG about his statement that the area was roped off (when it wasn't) , didn't contribute 

If LG or the other two want to tell him then that's cool

The fact they haven't however illustrates that perhaps if he was interested in the issues and the response then he needed to be there.

If one was not at the location (as I wasn't) and you actually believe in the issues and why they did what they did, you could message LG

Unknown editor edited March 01, 2018 06:24
Nz_Dave wrote:
AucklandPhoenix wrote:

I guess he could Vader. That would be classy and arrogant would it not?

Look back on this thread Big fella and you will see other posts the same. They were not arrogant and neither was my post

If you couldn't get off your ass and protest then why should you know what Dome  said

If you are actually interested and believe in the issues then go next time and you might hear some answers 

Others also asked, they haven't shared it and if they wanted to they probably would have by now 

I believe one of them said you needed to be there 

So don't be a c big fella

No offence but that's ridiculous. If I acted with that described attitude in my dealings with the club imagine how furious people would be - and rightly so. Luckily most people are not of the same mind as you.

There are many reasons people are unable to get info direct from the source whether it be location or personal commitments. To suggest that people have to "step up" in order to have the right to simply ask for info is something I hope never becomes the attitude of the majority around here. 

If the protesters would rather keep that info to themselves that is their call but it certainly isn't your place to belittle people for asking about it.

/rant

Dave with all due respect as you seem a nice guy and balanced in your views, Patrick was at the location and apart from beating his own drum, had no personal commitments.

He made a conscious decision not to attend and apart from questioning LG about his statement that the area was roped off (when it wasn't) , didn't contribute 

If LG or the other two want to tell him then that's cool

The fact they haven't however illustrates that perhaps if he was interested in the issues and the response then he needed to be there.

Unknown editor edited March 01, 2018 06:16
Nz_Dave wrote:
AucklandPhoenix wrote:

I guess he could Vader. That would be classy and arrogant would it not?

Look back on this thread Big fella and you will see other posts the same. They were not arrogant and neither was my post

If you couldn't get off your ass and protest then why should you know what Dome  said

If you are actually interested and believe in the issues then go next time and you might hear some answers 

Others also asked, they haven't shared it and if they wanted to they probably would have by now 

I believe one of them said you needed to be there 

So don't be a c big fella

No offence but that's ridiculous. If I acted with that described attitude in my dealings with the club imagine how furious people would be - and rightly so. Luckily most people are not of the same mind as you.

There are many reasons people are unable to get info direct from the source whether it be location or personal commitments. To suggest that people have to "step up" in order to have the right to simply ask for info is something I hope never becomes the attitude of the majority around here. 

If the protesters would rather keep that info to themselves that is their call but it certainly isn't your place to belittle people for asking about it.

/rant

Dave with all due respect as you seem a nice guy and balanced in your views, Patrick was at the location and apart from beating his own drum, had no personal commitments.

He made a conscious decision not to attend and apart from questioning LG about his statement that the area was roped off (when it wasn't) , didn't contribute 

If LG or the other two want to tell him then that's cool

The fact they haven't however illustrates that perhaps if he was interested in the issues and the response then he needed to be there.

No doubt however one could ask Dome, maybe he would share

Unknown editor edited March 01, 2018 06:16
Nz_Dave wrote:
AucklandPhoenix wrote:

I guess he could Vader. That would be classy and arrogant would it not?

Look back on this thread Big fella and you will see other posts the same. They were not arrogant and neither was my post

If you couldn't get off your ass and protest then why should you know what Dome  said

If you are actually interested and believe in the issues then go next time and you might hear some answers 

Others also asked, they haven't shared it and if they wanted to they probably would have by now 

I believe one of them said you needed to be there 

So don't be a c big fella

No offence but that's ridiculous. If I acted with that described attitude in my dealings with the club imagine how furious people would be - and rightly so. Luckily most people are not of the same mind as you.

There are many reasons people are unable to get info direct from the source whether it be location or personal commitments. To suggest that people have to "step up" in order to have the right to simply ask for info is something I hope never becomes the attitude of the majority around here. 

If the protesters would rather keep that info to themselves that is their call but it certainly isn't your place to belittle people for asking about it.

/rant

Dave with all due respect as you seem a nice guy and balanced in your views, Patrick was at the location and apart from beating his own drum, had no personal commitments.

He made a conscious decision not to attend and apart from questioning LG about his statement that the area was roped off (when it wasn't) , didn't contribute 

If LG or the other two want to tell him then that's cool

The fact they haven't however illustrates that perhaps if he was interested in the issues and the response then he needed to be there.

Unknown editor edited March 01, 2018 06:15
Nz_Dave wrote:
AucklandPhoenix wrote:

I guess he could Vader. That would be classy and arrogant would it not?

Look back on this thread Big fella and you will see other posts the same. They were not arrogant and neither was my post

If you couldn't get off your ass and protest then why should you know what Dome  said

If you are actually interested and believe in the issues then go next time and you might hear some answers 

Others also asked, they haven't shared it and if they wanted to they probably would have by now 

I believe one of them said you needed to be there 

So don't be a c big fella

No offence but that's ridiculous. If I acted with that described attitude in my dealings with the club imagine how furious people would be - and rightly so. Luckily most people are not of the same mind as you.

There are many reasons people are unable to get info direct from the source whether it be location or personal commitments. To suggest that people have to "step up" in order to have the right to simply ask for info is something I hope never becomes the attitude of the majority around here. 

If the protesters would rather keep that info to themselves that is their call but it certainly isn't your place to belittle people for asking about it.

/rant

Dave with all due respect as you seem a nice guy and balanced in your views, Patrick was at the location and apart from beating his own drum, had no personal commitments.

He made a conscious decision not to attend and apart from questioning LG about his statement that the area was roped off (when it wasn't) , didn't contribute 

If LG or the other two want to tell him then that's cool

The fact they haven't however illustrates that perhaps if you are interested in the issues and the response then you need to be there.

Unknown editor edited March 01, 2018 06:12
Nz_Dave wrote:
AucklandPhoenix wrote:

I guess he could Vader. That would be classy and arrogant would it not?

Look back on this thread Big fella and you will see other posts the same. They were not arrogant and neither was my post

If you couldn't get off your ass and protest then why should you know what Dome  said

If you are actually interested and believe in the issues then go next time and you might hear some answers 

Others also asked, they haven't shared it and if they wanted to they probably would have by now 

I believe one of them said you needed to be there 

So don't be a c big fella

No offence but that's ridiculous. If I acted with that described attitude in my dealings with the club imagine how furious people would be - and rightly so. Luckily most people are not of the same mind as you.

There are many reasons people are unable to get info direct from the source whether it be location or personal commitments. To suggest that people have to "step up" in order to have the right to simply ask for info is something I hope never becomes the attitude of the majority around here. 

If the protesters would rather keep that info to themselves that is their call but it certainly isn't your place to belittle people for asking about it.

/rant

Dave with all due respect as you seem a nice guy and balanced in your views, Patrick was at the location and apart from beating his own drum, had no personal commitments.

He made a conscious decision not to attend and apart from questioning LG about his statement that the area was roped off (when it wasn't) , didn't contribute 

Unknown editor edited March 01, 2018 06:10
Nz_Dave wrote:
AucklandPhoenix wrote:

I guess he could Vader. That would be classy and arrogant would it not?

Look back on this thread Big fella and you will see other posts the same. They were not arrogant and neither was my post

If you couldn't get off your ass and protest then why should you know what Dome  said

If you are actually interested and believe in the issues then go next time and you might hear some answers 

Others also asked, they haven't shared it and if they wanted to they probably would have by now 

I believe one of them said you needed to be there 

So don't be a c big fella

No offence but that's ridiculous. If I acted with that described attitude in my dealings with the club imagine how furious people would be - and rightly so. Luckily most people are not of the same mind as you.

There are many reasons people are unable to get info direct from the source whether it be location or personal commitments. To suggest that people have to "step up" in order to have the right to simply ask for info is something I hope never becomes the attitude of the majority around here. 

If the protesters would rather keep that info to themselves that is their call but it certainly isn't your place to belittle people for asking about it.

/rant

Dave with all due respect as you seem a nice guy and balanced in your views, Patrick was at the location and apart from beating his own drum, had no personal commitments.