Do you really think two coaches at the same time (pretty unusual; who does the dressing room trust more?) will be as good as either of the coaches you mentioned? Do you really believe Greenacre and Buckingham, based off mediocre performances against three of the lower table teams merit becoming the coaches? Some people are thinking appointing them is good "for this season"... I think there's still plenty of matches left to appoint an actual good coach rather than settling with mediocrity for the rest of the season. We need to be aiming higher than this.
I hope someone is appointed before the next match, but you know what the most likely and simultaneously most annoying outcome is? The pair of them either being either still interim or not but either way defeating the piss poor Adelaide, who have one win this season. Easy bloody win but for some reason heaps of people on this forum will be praising them once/if this happens. Getting 5 points against the lower table teams is not an achievement, sorry. Making that 8 after defeating the worst team this season really just makes our points look ok on the table when they're really not.
What we need to be asking ourselves is this: how will Greenacre and Buckingham fair against the good teams? Do people really believe we'll be getting a lot of points out of them, or are people content to settle for mediocrity... again?