In my opinion, Uli would still have the upper hand. Singh with better passing and vision than Uli, and much-improved positioning, defensive capability, physicality and shooting since leaving the Nix. Uli's the better finisher, with better touch and dribbling and seems to have more control over his movement. I think both lack the decision making you'd ideally want.
A very useful comparison though - the two followed very similar trajectories in their early careers. At Singh's age, Uli had already suffered through a couple average loan spells from Chelsea and until his time at the Nix had never really had the chance to show his capability to control a team. Uli had his real breakthrough at Córdoba in the 13/14 season in Spain's second tier aged 22, and would surely have continued his momentum if Chelsea cared at all about his development. I hope Singh finds his Córdoba - he's a system player who needs the team to run through him, much like I feel Uli is, and I have full faith he'll blossom given the right choice of club (Nuremberg egregiously misplayed him, for the record).
A very useful comparison though - the two followed very similar trajectories in their early careers. At Singh's age, Uli had already suffered through a couple average loan spells from Chelsea and until his time at the Nix had never really had the chance to show his capability to control a team. Uli had his real breakthrough at Córdoba in the 13/14 season in Spain's second tier aged 22, and would surely have continued his momentum if Chelsea cared at all about his development. I hope Singh finds his Córdoba - he's a system player who needs the team to run through him, much like I feel Uli is, and I have full faith he'll blossom given the right choice of club (Nuremberg egregiously misplayed him, for the record).