Post history

History for mrsmiis

Sarpreet Singh

Back to topic

Current version

Posted April 20, 2021 11:40 · last edited April 20, 2021 11:50

In my opinion, Uli would still have the upper hand. Singh with better passing and vision than Uli, and much-improved positioning, defensive capability, physicality and shooting since leaving the Nix. Uli's the better finisher, with better touch and dribbling and seems to have more control over his movement. I think both lack the decision making you'd ideally want. 

A very useful comparison though - the two followed very similar trajectories in their early careers. At Singh's age, Uli had already suffered through a couple average loan spells from Chelsea and until his time at the Nix had never really had the chance to show his capability to control a team. Uli had his real breakthrough at Córdoba in the 13/14 season in Spain's second tier aged 22, and would surely have continued his momentum if Chelsea cared at all about his development. I hope Singh finds his Córdoba - he's a system player who needs the team to run through him, much like I feel Uli is, and I have full faith he'll blossom given the right choice of club (Nuremberg egregiously misplayed him, for the record).

Previous versions

9 versions
Unknown editor edited April 20, 2021 11:50
In my opinion, Uli would still have the upper hand. Singh with better passing and vision than Uli, and much-improved positioning, defensive capability, physicality and shooting since leaving the Nix. Uli's the better finisher, with better touch and dribbling and seems to have more control over his movement. I think both lack the decision making you'd ideally want.

A very useful comparison though - the two followed very similar trajectories in their early careers. At Singh's age, Uli had already suffered through a couple average loan spells from Chelsea and until his time at the Nix had never really had the chance to show his capability to control a team at all. Uli had his real breakthrough at Córdoba in the 13/14 season in Spain's second tier aged 22, and would surely have continued his momentum if Chelsea cared at all about his development. I hope Singh finds his Córdoba - he's a system player who needs the team to run through him, much like I feel Uli is, and I have full faith he'll blossom given the right choice of club (Nuremberg egregiously misplayed him, for the record).
Unknown editor edited April 20, 2021 11:48
In my opinion, Uli would still have the upper hand. Singh with better passing and vision than Uli, and much-improved positioning, defensive capability, physicality and shooting since leaving the Nix. Uli's the better finisher, with better touch and dribbling and seems to have more control over his movement. I think both lack the decision making you'd ideally want.

A very useful comparison though - the two followed very similar trajectories in their early careers. At Singh's age, Uli had already suffered through a couple average loan spells from Chelsea and until his time at the Nix had never really had the chance to show his capability to control a team at all. Uli had his real breakthrough at Córdoba in the 13/14 season in Spain's second tier aged 22, and would surely have continued his momentum if Chelsea gave a shark about his development. I hope Singh finds his Córdoba - he's a system player who needs the team to run through him, much like I feel Uli is, and I have full faith he'll blossom given the right choice of club (Nuremberg egregiously misplayed him, for the record).
Unknown editor edited April 20, 2021 11:48
In my opinion, Uli would still have the upper hand. Singh with better passing and vision than Uli, and much-improved positioning, defensive capability, physicality and shooting since leaving the Nix. Uli's the better finisher, with better touch and dribbling and seems to have more control over his movement. I think both lack the decision making you'd ideally want.

A very useful comparison though - the two followed very similar trajectories in their early careers. At Singh's age, Uli had already suffered through a couple average loan spells from Chelsea and until his time at the Nix had never really had the chance to show his capability to control a team at all. Uli had his real breakthrough at Córdoba in the 13/14 season in Spain's second tier aged 22, and would surely have continued his momentum if Chelsea gave a shark about his development. I hope Singh finds his Córdoba - he's a system player who needs the team to run through him, much like I feel Uli is, and I have full faith he'll blossom given the right choice of club.
Unknown editor edited April 20, 2021 11:47
In my opinion, Uli would still have the upper hand. Singh with better passing and vision than Uli, and much-improved positioning, defensive capability, physicality and shooting since leaving the Nix. Uli's the better finisher, with better touch and dribbling and seems to have more control over his movement. I think both lack the decision making you'd ideally want.

A very useful comparison though - the two followed very similar trajectories in their early careers. At Singh's age, Uli had already suffered through a couple average loan spells from Chelsea and until his time at the Nix had never really had the chance to show his capability to control a team at all. Uli had his real breakthrough at Córdoba in the 13/14 season in Spain's second tier aged 22, and would surely have continued his momentum if Chelsea gave a shark about his development. I hope Singh finds his Córdoba - he's a system player who needs the team to run through him, much like I feel Uli is, and he'll blossom given the right choice.
Unknown editor edited April 20, 2021 11:47
In my opinion, Uli would still have the upper hand. Singh with better passing and vision than Uli, and much-improved positioning, defensive capability, physicality and shooting since leaving the Nix. Uli's the better finisher, with better touch and dribbling and seems to have more control over his movement. I think both lack the decision making you'd ideally want.

A very useful comparison though - the two followed very similar trajectories in their early careers. At Singh's age, Uli had already suffered through a couple average loan spells from Chelsea and until his time at the Nix had never really had the chance to show his capability to control a team at all. Uli had his real breakthrough at Córdoba in the 13/14 season in Spain's second tier aged 22, and would surely have continued his momentum if Chelsea gave a shark about his development. I hope Singh finds his Córdoba - he's a system player who needs the team to run through him, much like I feel Uli is.
Unknown editor edited April 20, 2021 11:47
In my opinion, Uli would still have the upper hand. Singh with better passing and vision than Uli, and much-improved positioning, defensive capability, physicality and shooting since leaving the Nix. Uli's the better finisher, with better touch and dribbling and seems to have more control over his movement. I think both lack the decision making you'd ideally want.

A very useful comparison though - the two followed very similar trajectories in their early careers. At Singh's age, Uli had already suffered through a couple average loan spells from Chelsea and until his time at the Nix had never really had the chance to show his capability to control a team at all. Uli had his real breakthrough at Córdoba in the 13/14 season in Spain's second tier aged 22, and would surely have continued his momentum if Chelsea gave a shark about his development.
Unknown editor edited April 20, 2021 11:46
In my opinion, Uli would still have the upper hand. Singh with better passing and vision than Uli, and much-improved positioning, defensive capability, physicality and shooting since leaving the Nix. Uli's the better finisher, with better touch and dribbling and seems to have more control over his movement. I think both lack the decision making you'd ideally want. 

A very useful comparison though - at Singh's age, Uli had already suffered through a couple average loan spells from Chelsea and until his time at the Nix had never really had the chance to show his capability to control a team at all. Uli had his real breakthrough at Córdoba in the 13/14 season in Spain's second tier aged 22, and would surely have continued his momentum if Chelsea gave a shark about his development.
Unknown editor edited April 20, 2021 11:45
In my opinion, Uli would still have the upper hand. Singh with better passing and vision than Uli, and much-improved positioning, defensive capability, physicality and shooting since leaving the Nix. Uli's the better finisher, with better touch and dribbling and seems to have more control over his movement. I think both lack the decision making you'd ideally want. 

A very useful comparison though - at this age, Uli had already suffered through a few bad loan spells from Chelsea and until his time at the Nix had never really had the chance to show his capability to control a team at all.
Unknown editor edited April 20, 2021 11:43
In my opinion, Uli would still have the upper hand. Singh with better passing and vision, and much-improved positioning, defensive capability and shooting since leaving the Nix. Uli's the better finisher, with better touch and dribbling and seems to have more control over his movement. Both lack the decision making you'd ideally want.