You can debate endlessly (and we have time and time again) whether kids should be able to go to a game without eating or drinking or the current f & b offering is ok but the reality is fans aren't turning up and the franchises playing at the stadium lose money just about every time they use it because the break even is a croud of 10,000.
At the same time the stadium personnel fixed costs have increased 38% in the last 5 years and they are still making a surplus north of $2m - so all the financial pain of falling attendances is being borne by the stadium users.
So, wouldn't it be a reasonable assumption that there is an issue with their cost structure from a users perspective and a reasonable expectation that the stadium board and management review and do something about their cost structure.
Wouldn't it also be a reasonable expectation that, in times of crises like now, the stadium management look at what it costs people to go to a game and what they can reasonably do to bring those costs down?
Finally a stated priority to: "Collaborate with the Hurricanes and the Phoenix with a view to significantly increasing the number of members across the three organisations" sounds rather hollow when you increase member parking costs and have said nothing publicly about what you are actually going to do.
I just think at a time when we are fighting for our survival everything is up for review and scrutiny including the stadium's cost structure, the cost of going to a game and what the stadium is going to do to contribute to a growth in membership.