Ok guys, Stalin, please explain to me if you can.
Why did we take a gamble on a guy with a dodgy track record, and pair him with a guy he didn't get on with who, apparently, had a bit of a reputation of his own for being difficult?
Why did Ernie fail here but has been, and is, successful elsewhere?
If Kalezic and Ernie were funded well, as people like Hard News Stalin seem to be telling us, what caused Ernie to fail here?
Dome's "we don't always get these things right" seems lame at best.
Who's "we". And why isn't he answering the questions above?
Now there is a whole thread moving onto discussing new coach possibilities. Like they might be the messiah. But surely the real rot seems elsewhere.
I've stopped going to games because we just aren't worth watching and there are better things to do. Sitting in a concrete jungle with a beer and a few friends is fine enough, but I can do that elsewhere and enjoy the experience without the Nix fouling up my day. Kudos to those who are "real" fans. But I am the sort of guy the club needs to keep and to add to.
Have a shot at convincing me the club's got this. 'Cause I'm not seeing it.
At this stage I'm very likely to drop our Foundation memberships. Not because we are shark, but because I don't see anybody giving any rational explanation for what's really wrong at this club or having any real plan to deal with it.
I know that answering those questions isn't anybody here's job or responsibility. Kudos to all those involved with Yellow Fever. But give it a shot if you can answer the above, for a disillusioned former fan. Because the conversation seems to be going all around those questions.
