All Whites, Ferns, and other international teams

2018 WC Qualification squad the best ever?

20 replies · 4,427 views
over 11 years ago · edited over 11 years ago · History
Can't think of a squad we have ever had with as much potential as the one we have at the moment. Where do you think our 2018 qualification squad / WC squad if we get lucky will rate Vs previous All white squads? ON PAPER atm our best is maybe: Wood Barbarouses-Thomas-Rojas Mcginchley-Keat Smith-Fitgerald-Reid-Roux Moss Others: Boxall, Lochead, Durante, Fenton, Gleeson, Brockie, Henderson, Tuiloma, Boyd, Smeltz Looking towards 2018 we could see Tuiloma, Gleeson, and depending on how Mcginchley kicks on into his 30's maybe fenton or boyd come into our best XI. With some luck Fitgerald may become available again as well. Best case: Barbarouses-Wood-Rojas Mcginchley Thomas-Tuiloma-Roux Smith-Reid-Fitzgerald Gleeson Sorry about the spacing I spaced everything in the edit but it didn't show up. =/
Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago

Depends how players progress. People underate the 2010 squad. Might be a long time before we get a combo of Elliot, Vicelich, Reid, Smith, Nelsen again (yes some came on board later) down the spine of a team.

Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago

2ndBest wrote:

Depends how players progress. People underate the 2010 squad. Might be a long time before we get a combo of Elliot, Vicelich, Reid, Smith, Nelsen again (yes some came on board later) down the spine of a team.

not quite as exciting to watch as the potential 2018 team.

Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago

2ndBest wrote:

Depends how players progress. People underate the 2010 squad. Might be a long time before we get a combo of Elliot, Vicelich, Reid, Smith, Nelsen again (yes some came on board later) down the spine of a team.

not quite as exciting to watch as the potential 2018 team.

ok. Who is this potential 2018 team. Please lay out your argument and sway all.

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago

The potential 2018 team could be quite exciting as an attacking unit. 

However at the moment I think it'd be a lot weaker defensively, which could see us struggle a lot more than we did in 2010. 


Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago

When you look at Reid, Nelsen and Elliot who played EPL, our most capped AW and Smith who is playing Championship, that's a tough act to follow.

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago

Jeff Vader wrote:

2ndBest wrote:

Depends how players progress. People underate the 2010 squad. Might be a long time before we get a combo of Elliot, Vicelich, Reid, Smith, Nelsen again (yes some came on board later) down the spine of a team.

not quite as exciting to watch as the potential 2018 team.

ok. Who is this potential 2018 team. Please lay out your argument and sway all.

look at post 1

Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago

Tegal wrote:

The potential 2018 team could be quite exciting as an attacking unit. 

However at the moment I think it'd be a lot weaker defensively, which could see us struggle a lot more than we did in 2010. 

fear call! I'd rather watch an exciting attacking unit, then a long ball defensive unit!

Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago

So would I. but I'd also rather get results. Questionable if we would without a similar defensive unit to what we had in 2010. 


Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago

Jeff Vader wrote:

When you look at Reid, Nelsen and Elliot who played EPL, our most capped AW and Smith who is playing Championship, that's a tough act to follow.

To counter this, Reid and Smith are significantly better players than they were then (and I assume they will only get better), as is Wood. Then you add the potential likes of Tuiloma, Rojas etc and its quite exciting.

But there is no way to know until these players push on (if they do) and we see where they are closer to the time. Certainly wont be as easy a qualification as it was on 2010 though.

Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago · edited over 11 years ago · History

i agree that there is a lot to get excited about there, but a quick analysis of that group has me worried about the middle of our midfield.

in terms of defenders; Reid is up there with our best, but at the moment he is the only one that i could place alongside dunford, evans, herbert, and gray and we had those guys roughly at the same time

360footballnews.com

Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago

The problem is also the style of play - my thought is at that level its safer to play long ball for a mediocre team. So if our team is setup to play with the ball on the ground then we might not be good enough to make it even though we are better than the kick and hope teams of the past.

Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago

Ryan wrote:

The problem is also the style of play - my thought is at that level its safer to play long ball for a mediocre team. So if our team is setup to play with the ball on the ground then we might not be good enough to make it even though we are better than the kick and hope teams of the past.

I cant agree with this at all!!!

We have the players just need the right coach....... Look at ACFC - yes they have foreigners but also some very good kiwi's. Phoenix don't play a long ball game and look good, at times, when they are playing well. The NZ U20's certainly try to keep the ball. It is the only way forward for NZ just need the commitment and, dare I say it again, the right coach.....

Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago

Yes but those teams are playing well in their same level. Its a huge step up from us to say Mexico and we could be exposed as Sydney FC were last night.

Lets see how the nix go today and then use that to fuel an argument :)

Don't get me wrong, I would love us to play attractive and skill-full football; they might well be better than any other all whites team in the past but are they really world class? Without exception I would say probably not - give them four years or so and maybe there is enough quality.

At least with hoofball you can get out of trouble easily and luck into a goal, as funny as it sounds if we focus more on skill and less on luck then we could be in trouble. I hope not.

Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago

Ryan wrote:

Yes but those teams are playing well in their same level. Its a huge step up from us to say Mexico and we could be exposed as Sydney FC were last night.

Lets see how the nix go today and then use that to fuel an argument :)

Don't get me wrong, I would love us to play attractive and skill-full football; they might well be better than any other all whites team in the past but are they really world class? Without exception I would say probably not - give them four years or so and maybe there is enough quality.

At least with hoofball you can get out of trouble easily and luck into a goal, as funny as it sounds if we focus more on skill and less on luck then we could be in trouble. I hope not.

How the Nix goes today will have no bearing on how good we will be for the 2018 WC.

If you are old and wise you were probably young and stupid

Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago

nope, but it has a beering on the argument above.

Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago

It's not like you either play hoof & hope or tika-taka though - there's more than two (extreme) tactical approaches possible. I think sitting deep and counterattacking down the wings through the likes of Rojas and Thomas and then whipping flat crosses for Wood could work for instance.

People like Coldplay and voted for the Nazis. You can't trust people.

Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago

Ryan wrote:

nope, but it has a beering on the argument above.

Does that mean on the grog?

If you are old and wise you were probably young and stupid

Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago · edited over 11 years ago · History

Leggy wrote:

Ryan wrote:

nope, but it has a beering on the argument above.

Does that mean on the grog?

I do now.

The good thing is that a good all whites team is built on a good phoenix squad. This appears to be that.

All arguments above have been lost.

Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago

A big difference for me is the potential we have now in the FB roles which we have not had for a long period.

Roux, Tuiloma and Doyle all look like good young prospects that have good engines and can get forward. This will help our attack and allow us to play with more width and also should give us more confidence in the Back.

With Reid, Smith, Durante, Boxall and Fitzgerald if he comes back we have plenty of depth at CB.

Alot though does depend on how our youngsters develop... but I am filled with a lot more confidence and excitement now than I can ever recall previously.

Permalink Permalink
over 11 years ago

Its alright to mention all these great up and coming players, the hardest part is getting a cohesive unit.

Look at the mighty England team Brasil 2014!!

Permalink Permalink