Posted January 07, 2018 03:43 · last edited January 07, 2018 03:43
In my employment contract there is a six month clause whereby in short it says we appreciate that you have a right to make a living, but if you leave you can't pinch our clients or staff for a period of 6 months.
If it is in my contract which I believe meets employment law I don't see why it can't be NZ footballs.
Emblen hasn't been on contract with NZF since June.
Bazeley's NZF contract would have ended the same time as Hudson's.
Kim's NZF contract would have ended the same time as Hudson's.
In my employment contract there is a six month clause whereby in short it says we appreciate that you have a right to make a living, but if you leave you can't pinch our clients or staff for a period of 6 months.
If it is in my contract which I believe meets employment law I don't see why it can't be NZ footballs.
Emblen hasn't been on contract with NZF since June.
Bazeley's NZF contract would have ended the same time as Hudson's.