Current version

Posted June 23, 2026 09:36 · last edited June 23, 2026 11:01

MetalLegNZ wrote:
Interesting call on Bazeley... to call him the biggest anchor to this team, when I think everyone on here would admit the All Whites have played some of their best ever football during this tournament is to me, highly contradictory.

We have seen, in friendlies, that outside our starting 11, we lack depth. That our bench has lacked influence. Losing Garbett made that worse. Bazeley, probably quite reasonably could have thought, my best 11, is the only 11 capable of getting us back into the game. Fresh legs might bring energy, but at what cost, quality?

Thomas is the only exception to that rule - but given his lack of minutes, one can understand why he has perhaps not been given more time. 

For a long time, people have talked about the next World Cup as our best chance, when this current crop are all late twenties, early thirties and experienced pros. I still think it is... assuming we can find a decent striker outside Wood.


 
I think we have like 14-16 players that deserve to start at the WC.

You could add Bindon, Old (as a LB) and Thomas to the 11 who ran on. Paulsen, even coming off a poor club season. Garbett a big loss. I don’t think Randall is ready yet

But yes your point stands it’s a small pool of players. No matter who is in charge we should expect us to do better in 2030, as this cohort mostly hit their peak years. LBS maybe an excitement machine then

Egypt popn 128 million and I’m sure they have more than 60 pro footballers 

Previous versions

3 versions
coochiee edited June 23, 2026 11:01
MetalLegNZ wrote:
Interesting call on Bazeley... to call him the biggest anchor to this team, when I think everyone on here would admit the All Whites have played some of their best ever football during this tournament is to me, highly contradictory.

We have seen, in friendlies, that outside our starting 11, we lack depth. That our bench has lacked influence. Losing Garbett made that worse. Bazeley, probably quite reasonably could have thought, my best 11, is the only 11 capable of getting us back into the game. Fresh legs might bring energy, but at what cost, quality?

Thomas is the only exception to that rule - but given his lack of minutes, one can understand why he has perhaps not been given more time. 

For a long time, people have talked about the next World Cup as our best chance, when this current crop are all late twenties, early thirties and experienced pros. I still think it is... assuming we can find a decent striker outside Wood.


 
I think we have like 14-16 players that deserve to start at the WC.

You could add Bindon, Old (as a LB) and Thomas to the 11 who ran on. Paulsen, even coming off a poor club season. Garbett a big loss. I don’t think Randall is ready yet

But yes your point stands it’s a small pool of players. No matter who is in charge we should expect us to better in 2030 as this cohort mostly hit their peak years. LBS maybe an excitement machine then

Egypt popn 128 million and I’m sure they have more than 60 pro footballers 
coochiee edited June 23, 2026 09:38
MetalLegNZ wrote:
Interesting call on Bazeley... to call him the biggest anchor to this team, when I think everyone on here would admit the All Whites have played some of their best ever football during this tournament is to me, highly contradictory.

We have seen, in friendlies, that outside our starting 11, we lack depth. That our bench has lacked influence. Losing Garbett made that worse. Bazeley, probably quite reasonably could have thought, my best 11, is the only 11 capable of getting us back into the game. Fresh legs might bring energy, but at what cost, quality?

Thomas is the only exception to that rule - but given his lack of minutes, one can understand why he has perhaps not been given more time. 

For a long time, people have talked about the next World Cup as our best chance, when this current crop are all late twenties, early thirties and experienced pros. I still think it is... assuming we can find a decent striker outside Wood.


 
I think we have like 14-16 players that deserve to start at the WC.

You could add Bindon, Old and Thomas to the 11 who ran on. Paulsen as the no 2 keeper. Garbett a big loss. I don’t think Randall is ready yet

But yes your point stands it’s a small pool of players. No matter who is in charge we should expect us to better in 2030 as this cohort mostly hit their peak years. LBS maybe an excitement machine then

Egypt popn 128 million and I’m sure they have more than 60 pro footballers 
coochiee edited June 23, 2026 09:36
MetalLegNZ wrote:
Interesting call on Bazeley... to call him the biggest anchor to this team, when I think everyone on here would admit the All Whites have played some of their best ever football during this tournament is to me, highly contradictory.

We have seen, in friendlies, that outside our starting 11, we lack depth. That our bench has lacked influence. Losing Garbett made that worse. Bazeley, probably quite reasonably could have thought, my best 11, is the only 11 capable of getting us back into the game. Fresh legs might bring energy, but at what cost, quality?

Thomas is the only exception to that rule - but given his lack of minutes, one can understand why he has perhaps not been given more time. 

For a long time, people have talked about the next World Cup as our best chance, when this current crop are all late twenties, early thirties and experienced pros. I still think it is... assuming we can find a decent striker outside Wood.


 
I think we have like 14-16 players that deserve to start at the WC.

You could add Bindon, Old and Thomas to the 11 who ran on. Paulsen as the no 2 keeper. Garbett a big loss. I don’t think Randall is ready

But yes your point stands it’s a small pool of players. No matter who is in charge we should expect us to better in 2030 as this cohort mostly hit their peak years. LBS maybe an excitement machine then

Egypt popn 128 million and I’m sure they have more than 60 pro footballers