Current version

Posted November 11, 2017 19:45 · last edited November 11, 2017 23:59

Jeff Vader wrote:

Wood_9 wrote:
I've been lurking this forum for a long time and.....
See that’s where you went wrong cause at least now we know for sure that you have no clue.

How anyone can say “that’s not a good result” when the odds are so heavily against us is fudgeing clueless.

They are expected dominate and win this tie easily

They are ranked 100 places ahead of us

We were expected to capitulate

Man for man, they beat us in 9 maybe 8 matchups for talent head to head

We have a 0-0 draw and that’s a bad result? 

What were you expecting, a 3-0 win to NZ

That’s probably our best result ever in our history against a team ranked that high (I say probably because I do not know for sure)

Go back to lurking

Um, draw with Italy in 2010 when they were defending champs? 

What you said

Edit: I read something that this is rated in our top 3 results?

Previous versions

1 version
Unknown editor edited November 11, 2017 23:59
ConanTroutman wrote:
Jeff Vader wrote:
Wood_9 wrote:
I've been lurking this forum for a long time and.....
See that’s where you went wrong cause at least now we know for sure that you have no clue.

How anyone can say “that’s not a good result” when the odds are so heavily against us is fudgeing clueless.

They are expected dominate and win this tie easily

They are ranked 100 places ahead of us

We were expected to capitulate

Man for man, they beat us in 9 maybe 8 matchups for talent head to head

We have a 0-0 draw and that’s a bad result? 

What were you expecting, a 3-0 win to NZ

That’s probably our best result ever in our history against a team ranked that high (I say probably because I do not know for sure)

Go back to lurking

Um, draw with Italy in 2010 when they were defending champs? 
What you said (doh I knew I was missing something)