All Whites vs Peru | Second leg | Thurs 16 Nov | 3:15pm | SS1

Marquee
4.5K
·
6.8K
·
almost 14 years

maynardf wrote:

wood needed to do better then 

Hudson needed to do better then

Marquee
1.7K
·
7.5K
·
about 17 years

For all the shark Herbert got for being overly defensive - I don't think i've seen as negative a set up as Hudson started in the last two games.

Starting XI
640
·
3.6K
·
over 14 years

maynardf wrote:

wood needed to do better then 

harsh. Awkward bouncing ball at shin height, defender on his back and. Keeper rushing out

in this game thats the best we will get

Starting XI
640
·
3.6K
·
over 14 years

I'm proud of our boys - 120 something in the world. 


Was always going to be very tough - every player gave it there all.

and 1 other
Marquee
1.7K
·
7.5K
·
about 17 years

I hope it rains on their public holiday.....

I wish them well.  They have well and truly out played us.  It means a lot to them, and I hope they enjoy it.

and 2 others
First Team Squad
86
·
1.2K
·
over 17 years

maynardf wrote:

our allready tough position has not been made easier by this ref he has been useless

4 ET for that half?  Hmm. yeah.

Marquee
4.3K
·
5.7K
·
about 12 years

Well done Peru - i hope you do well at the WC.

Starting XI
4.2K
·
3.7K
·
over 10 years

The lack of pens against Peru is frustrating.

But still 2-0 over 2 games, against Peru, I'm still pretty chuffed with the team.

Marquee
2.4K
·
5K
·
about 17 years

Ninja wrote:

Hudson managed to deceive us all with those elaborate powerpoint presentations. 

Not me, I never fell for that shark, I looked at what he had (not) achieved prior to us and what was said about him by the Welsh fans in  Newport.

First Team Squad
1.2K
·
1.2K
·
over 9 years

Bye Hudson.

Hoping for 0 - 0 by HT and then bringing on attackers. Hmmm.

Brockie on as last resort. 

Marquee
5.3K
·
9.5K
·
almost 13 years

Addicks wrote:

Addicks wrote:

Brockie for Dura - aggresssive.

Do people genuinely think Hudson would choose to not play Wood even if he was fully fit? 

If you're fit enough to come on at half time you're fit enough to start

And play until half time? 

If Hudson said it was tactical, then yeah...redefines tactical.

play until halftime, get a massage in the sheds at least, come back out. This way we only get 45 minutes from him. If he started we might have got more. And we look 10 times more threatening when he's on.
Marquee
5.3K
·
9.5K
·
almost 13 years

maynardf wrote:

maynardf wrote:

wood needed to do better then 

harsh. Awkward bouncing ball at shin height, defender on his back and. Keeper rushing out

in this game thats the best we will get

I'd say his earlier header was a better chance
Starting XI
4.2K
·
3.7K
·
over 10 years

It's tough to be too frustrated when you see how much it means to their fans, seeing there joy has even put a smile on my face.

Phoenix Academy
20
·
300
·
about 12 years

So into injury time, with three minutes left and we have a  corner why was there only four players in the box?

First Team Squad
1.2K
·
1.2K
·
over 9 years

Hudson: "Wood can play 60 mins"

*Hudson plays him for 45 mins*

First Team Squad
1.2K
·
1.2K
·
over 9 years

Given how NZF works right now, I can't wait to see their budget cut version.

Marquee
7.6K
·
9.6K
·
almost 14 years

Yep, it's like Hudson was forced to a game plan in round one that worked quite well and thought he'd replicate it.

First Team Squad
1.2K
·
1.6K
·
almost 15 years

Marto wrote:

Its clear we're going home.  The English commentator on my stream said that "NZ has shown nothing over the two legs against Peru".  I have to agree.

Disagree completely. I think we've shown we can compete with nations ranked 100 levels above us, at least at home. We've shown we don't deserve our current rating, and shown that plenty of our players have bright futures. We've shown it is worth investing in the national team at least with a lot of young talent and overall things are looking very good for the next few years.

WeeNix
390
·
960
·
about 11 years

"all of Anthony hudson's excellence" stoooooooooooooooooooooooopppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppp

First Team Squad
1.2K
·
1.6K
·
almost 15 years

Balbi wrote:

Hudson: "Wood can play 60 mins"

*Hudson plays him for 45 mins*

Keep in mind there was the potential for 30 minutes of time added on and we'd want Wood for penalties if it came to that.

Marquee
4.5K
·
6.8K
·
almost 14 years

We played well with our limited resources, and by that I mean money, travel, infrastructure, exposure, talent available. By "talent available" I also mean coaching.

First Team Squad
86
·
1.2K
·
over 17 years

A bit frustrated by that, seeing what we could string together, admittedly when Peru had something to defend. Guts!

Starting XI
1.6K
·
2.6K
·
almost 17 years

thank goodness we went down two goals so we were encouraged to actually play football, sort of.

good effort from the team against big odds.  but I think I'd rather see us try to play 

First Team Squad
1.2K
·
1.6K
·
almost 15 years

maynardf wrote:

maynardf wrote:

wood needed to do better then 

harsh. Awkward bouncing ball at shin height, defender on his back and. Keeper rushing out

in this game thats the best we will get

I'd say his earlier header was a better chance

No way that was a foul either.

First Team Squad
1.2K
·
1.2K
·
over 9 years

djtim3000 wrote:

Balbi wrote:

Hudson: "Wood can play 60 mins"

*Hudson plays him for 45 mins*

Keep in mind there was the potential for 30 minutes of time added on and we'd want Wood for penalties if it came to that.

Aye but conversely it was obvious Hudson wanted 0 - 0 at half time and then 45 mins for Wood to grab a goal and avoid extra time.

Wood starts and plays 60 and maybe nicks a goal in the first half, things are a bit different.

Unless Hudson assumed we'd go a goal down and Wood was there to get the equaliser.

Whatever, we're fudged now NZF has no money.

Phoenix Academy
120
·
180
·
over 7 years

Bananas wrote:

The lack of pens against Peru is frustrating.

But still 2-0 over 2 games, against Peru, I'm still pretty chuffed with the team.

I'm disappointed we never merged with the Asian Confederation. This home and away, against sides like Mexico and Peru, is way too tough.

Bahrain was doable, but there was still nothing in that either.

In saying that, if we had a bit more upfront tonight then we were a good chance for a draw.

I know it's not much consolation to us but this means a heck of a lot to Peruvians. Thirty six years out of the WC Finals is quite incredible really.

Trialist
30
·
47
·
over 8 years

Now we are out - I'd like for Peru and Oz to be in same pool to see how they compare. Is that possible?

Marquee
2.4K
·
5K
·
about 17 years

djtim3000 wrote:

Marto wrote:

Its clear we're going home.  The English commentator on my stream said that "NZ has shown nothing over the two legs against Peru".  I have

Disagree completely. I think we've shown we can compete with nations ranked 100 levels above us, at least at home. We've shown we don't deserve our current rating, and shown that plenty of our players have bright futures. We've shown it is worth investing in the national team at least with a lot of young talent and overall things are looking very good for the next few years.

I think this Peru side will struggle in Russia.  I was at Wembley for the Brazil England match, both of those teams would have destroyed Peru and us from what I've seen.  

While happy with the draw in Wellington, we should have got a result there but Hudson's BS use of Wood etc nullified that option.

Starting XI
550
·
2.4K
·
almost 15 years

Peru were not that good, Australia could have beaten them in the playoffs.

First Team Squad
1.2K
·
1.6K
·
almost 15 years

Also I think Wynne and Colvey showed they have a future with the national team. Considering all the Peru attacking play was through the wide areas they did well.

Life and death
2.4K
·
5.5K
·
over 17 years
Marquee
2.4K
·
5K
·
about 17 years

Nommag wrote:

I have false hope, I'm going to be devastated if we lose and I know its irrational

How gutted are you atm?

First Team Squad
1.2K
·
1.6K
·
almost 15 years

Royz wrote:

Peru were not that good, Australia could have beaten them in the playoffs.

Seriously? I think Peru were very good in the first half, they had a plan to stretch play wide and their cross field balls, control and support play to do this was executed perfectly.

First Team Squad
1.3K
·
1.3K
·
about 13 years

Honestly on fourfourtwo forums aussie fans saying they would have easily doubt with Peru. They were awful against Hondurus. Lets hope Peru get paired with them at wc and maul them.

Trialist
51
·
110
·
almost 7 years

Great effort from your boys...says a lot Gareca put in a third CB at the end

Phoenix Academy
20
·
300
·
about 12 years

PARK THE BUS never works. Having your best player on the bench for half the game so you can use him as a strike weapon never works. But hey Anthony Hudson you have that win over New Caledonia on your CV.

Phoenix Academy
120
·
180
·
over 7 years

What now?

Back to club footy.

The national team dreams are over for another four years.

Qatar '22 (if it even gets played there) begins...tomorrow. Today is all about being as flat as.

Marquee
7.6K
·
9.6K
·
almost 14 years

Yeah, Australia are not great either and were lucky that they got Hondurous and not the US.

Trialist
51
·
110
·
almost 7 years

djtim3000 wrote:

Royz wrote:

Peru were not that good, Australia could have beaten them in the playoffs.

Seriously? I think Peru were very good in the first half, they had a plan to stretch play wide and their cross field balls, control and support play to do this was executed perfectly.

they were fantastic in 1st half...2nd half was more gutsy than classy

Moar stars
2.1K
·
4.8K
·
about 12 years

lmao. Aus v Hon was worse than the average a league game.

You’ll need an account to join the conversation!

Sign in Sign up