Current version

Posted August 29, 2017 03:04 · last edited August 29, 2017 03:06

el grapadura wrote:

Nelfoos wrote:

el grapadura wrote:

Nelfoos wrote:

This simply isn't good enough from 3 players regarded as the future of the AWs. Hopefully this makes them realise Hudson is serious and they get their A into G.

Disregarding what Hudson coulda/shoulda/woulda done in the past, this is 100% the right move and good on him. There shouldn't be any excuses on Inghams part.

The only thing Hudson is serious about is protecting his own reputation. Even if it means throwing young players under the bus.

That's a far, far more cynical view than I would be willing to take. 

I wish it was cynical.

You're right. Absurd is closer.

I can't see any of the players standing for Hudson chucking a kid to protect his own reputation.

Previous versions

1 version
Unknown editor edited August 29, 2017 03:06
el grapadura wrote:
Nelfoos wrote:
el grapadura wrote:
Nelfoos wrote:

This simply isn't good enough from 3 players regarded as the future of the AWs. Hopefully this makes them realise Hudson is serious and they get their A into G.

Disregarding what Hudson coulda/shoulda/woulda done in the past, this is 100% the right move and good on him. There shouldn't be any excuses on Inghams part.

The only thing Hudson is serious about is protecting his own reputation. Even if it means throwing young players under the bus.

That's a far, far more cynical view than I would be willing to take. 

I wish it was cynical.

You're right. Absurd is closer.