All Whites, Ferns, and other international teams

Name Change?

159 replies · 9,204 views
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
The best argument i have heard to change to the black strip is that it is unique in footballing terms. But i do struggle when people say they want them top wear black because they want them to be unique, but also they want them to wear black so there the same as every other New Zealand team. 

All Aboard the Phoenix/ All Whites Bandwagon!!

Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
scoop wrote:
The best argument i have heard to change to the black strip is that it is unique in footballing terms. But i do struggle when people say they want them top wear black because they want them to be unique, but also they want them to wear black so there the same as every other New Zealand team. 
 
there is no national team that wears pink with white spots that i know of..

Founder

Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
el grapadura wrote:

The all white kit coincided with the best period in New Zealand's football history.
[/QUOTE]
What complete bollocks! I could make a compelling argument that it also coincided with the worst period in NZ football history.

I also suspect that you really mean the history of the NZ team since I would have to say the 70's were probably the best period for NZ football overall.

[QUOTE=el grapadura]
It created an identity and legacy for the generations to follow and aspire to. The previous 80 years? Did sweet fark all for that.

...and you would know that how?



Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Malky wrote:

el grapadura wrote:
The all white kit coincided with the best period in New Zealand's football history.[/QUOTE]What complete bollocks! I could make a compelling argument that it also coincided with the worst period in NZ football history.I also suspect that you really mean the history of the NZ team since I would have to say the 70's were probably the best period for NZ football overall.[QUOTE=el grapadura]It created an identity and legacy for the generations to follow and aspire to. The previous 80 years? Did sweet fark all for that.

...and you would know that how?


I thought it's clearly obvious that I was talking about the national team...

And please enlighten us about those glory days of the New Zealand national football team in the first 80 years of the 20th century...
Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
The psychological edge of wearing black is for us rather not them. Like the Olympic Kayak team of Freg and MacDonald. I haven't really seen any national football teams that wear black so it can have a unique favour to our team.

The psychological edge helps in close scoring games not against the obvious stronger opponents (e.g.Spain) but other teams that are within our scope. NZ has their share of draws that could be wins if they approach the game with a win mentality rather than a lose or draw mentality in my years of observing and I believe the Black colour can make it easier to get that mentality to be honest. No dishing on the All Whites of the past but really we tend to play better in alternative colours.

Classier with Black will polarised the on field thinking. The only downpoint is that referees may tend to award free kicks easier against us because we are wearing black. The colour does bring a psychological factor more into play. Other teams tend to fuss up in fouls but then that serves to help us because the referees tend to get annoyed at teams for make too much fuss and make the vital decisions our way at the death end of the game just because the referee is tired of the other team.

Besides the non-football public that is attending the game wouldn't feel out of place by wearing an All Black rugby top just because they haven't brought an All White soccer top. We would get more people, who are not soccer fans, interested in attending the game if all they have to wear is a black top with a silver fern rather than the vice versa.


You can't possibly be serious...el grapadura2009-05-15 13:19:42
Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Perhaps we could wear black and carry a whistle, look like eleven referees, then the other side will dive, roll around and generally not mess with us....
Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
el grapadura wrote:
Malky wrote:

el grapadura wrote:
The all white kit coincided with the best period in New Zealand's football history.[/QUOTE]What complete bollocks! I could make a compelling argument that it also coincided with the worst period in NZ football history.I also suspect that you really mean the history of the NZ team since I would have to say the 70's were probably the best period for NZ football overall.[QUOTE=el grapadura]It created an identity and legacy for the generations to follow and aspire to. The previous 80 years? Did sweet fark all for that.

...and you would know that how?


I thought it's clearly obvious that I was talking about the national team...

And please enlighten us about those glory days of the New Zealand national football team in the first 80 years of the 20th century...

I have no idea and I never said that I did, but you must do to be able to make that statement.

Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Perhaps they want to save on drycleaning bills.  It's much easier to get grass stains and skid marks out of balck than is for white.
Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
el grapadura wrote:
The psychological edge of wearing black is for us rather not them. Like the Olympic Kayak team of Freg and MacDonald. I haven't really seen any national football teams that wear black so it can have a unique favour to our team.

The psychological edge helps in close scoring games not against the obvious stronger opponents (e.g.Spain) but other teams that are within our scope. NZ has their share of draws that could be wins if they approach the game with a win mentality rather than a lose or draw mentality in my years of observing and I believe the Black colour can make it easier to get that mentality to be honest. No dishing on the All Whites of the past but really we tend to play better in alternative colours.

Classier with Black will polarised the on field thinking. The only downpoint is that referees may tend to award free kicks easier against us because we are wearing black. The colour does bring a psychological factor more into play. Other teams tend to fuss up in fouls but then that serves to help us because the referees tend to get annoyed at teams for make too much fuss and make the vital decisions our way at the death end of the game just because the referee is tired of the other team.

Besides the non-football public that is attending the game wouldn't feel out of place by wearing an All Black rugby top just because they haven't brought an All White soccer top. We would get more people, who are not soccer fans, interested in attending the game if all they have to wear is a black top with a silver fern rather than the vice versa.


You can't possibly be serious...
 
 It was a recycled arguement years ago in 1989, I thought that I should stir up the pot again.
 
Personally the tag "All Whites" is really a reflection of an era rather than a decent reflection of national identity with some countries. If it helps them to get more patrotic pride and a stronger national sponsorship etc, then why not? It is not as though the hardcore fans will suddenly stop watching them.
 
However the rest of NZ who are not fans are not really that endeared to the White uniform as they are to the Black uniform, because White is seen to be a bit of a plain Jane.
 
I think it's a case of the hardcore fans not listening to the rest of the country who are in no doubt love any sports and would bandwagon if it suits them. A black uniform will help with the bandwagon crowds. The team, of course, has to win.
 
I can't see they would not give it a shot for a couple of years. There was obviously plenty of great feedback about the Black uniforms even on this forum and NZ football has taken to heart some of the comments about it.
 
The only reason they would bring this up is the feedback they got from the ordinary public. It was never a huge issue before, it was a small issue in the late 80's and early 90's. And it was grabbing the attention of the bandwagon fans outside the hardcore fans of the sport.
 
So just for the bandwagon factor, I say go for it.
 
Did I mention about bring the HAKA?
Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
matty.j wrote:



 Every image I've seen of NZ football teams up to 1981 has them in Black tops and white shorts.



I love how you insist that white isn't one of the national colours, then post a picture with NZ playing in both black and white



Anyways, at the library now, and the first ever NZ team (1904) wore white tops, black shots and black socks. Same in 1905.

1927-1967 was black tops, white shorts, black socks (same as your post), though NZ wore white/black/black at home in 1948 (this may have been an allowance for the dark-shirted Australian team. I don't know whether or not "home team gets first dibs on kit" was in effect then). 1947 was all black. 1965-66 has a photo at the Basin with white shorts, white socks, and black/white stripes (a la Newcastle's top) against England.

Nothing on the 70's, and everything after 1981 is obvious.

So while black was dominant for at least a forty year period (I can't speak for the 10's or 70's), white was the original. That reason alone doesn't make it more important than the black kit (ie Wellington rep rugby started off in red and blue, yet I see no reason to change from black and gold), but that + 1982 (and for that matter, the amazing efforts of our girls last year - NZ football isn't just the senior mens team).

Both colours have significant places in NZ footballing history - black in quantity, white in quality. Considering all of NZ's signicant success has been in white, and is currently white, and is associated in the general community as white, I'd stick with the status quo but insist our away kits stay black.

TBH I wouldn't mind compromising - reverting to the original & pre-"All Whites" white kit with black shorts and socks, with out alternate being black shirts, white shorts and white/black socks. That way the name All Whites can stay (even if only in an unofficial, White Noise endorsed capacity), more black can be included instead of just as trim, and we avoid having alternate kit colours that aren't official (such as recent blue, or previous reds and greens).

Also, 100% black looks terrible The best All Blacks uniforms were the ones with white collars.
Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
cheers for that Robb. Can you do my essay whilst your there too..

Founder

Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
el grapadura wrote:
Malky wrote:

el grapadura wrote:
The all white kit coincided with the best period in New Zealand's football history.[/QUOTE]What complete bollocks! I could make a compelling argument that it also coincided with the worst period in NZ football history.I also suspect that you really mean the history of the NZ team since I would have to say the 70's were probably the best period for NZ football overall.[QUOTE=el grapadura]It created an identity and legacy for the generations to follow and aspire to. The previous 80 years? Did sweet fark all for that.

...and you would know that how?


I thought it's clearly obvious that I was talking about the national team...

And please enlighten us about those glory days of the New Zealand national football team in the first 80 years of the 20th century...
 
Glory days, not so much in the results but at least they played plently of home games so that us kids growing up in the 60/70s got to see them play. Used to be great having the 11 of us kids in the coaches Zephyr tripping into the basin to watch our heros play. We didnt need to have marketing nick names to get behind our team, we just called them New Zealand. 1981/82 didnt just happen, it was the years before that that got the team its core following.
 
I dont care what they are called, its irrelevant. They are our team and I'll support them whatever the marketing idoits want to call them.
nightz2009-05-15 20:56:13

A dog with a bone :)

Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
that confirms my theory that you are about 110yrs old Nightz

Founder

Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Growing up in the 60/70s makes me 110 does it. I know you are numericaly challenged, so much so that you havent worked out the 1 yellow + 1 yellow = 1 red

A dog with a bone :)

Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I usually skip the yellows

Founder

Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
robbwatson wrote:
matty.j wrote:



 Every image I've seen of NZ football teams up to 1981 has them in Black tops and white shorts.



I love how you insist that white isn't one of the national colours, then post a picture with NZ playing in both black and white



Anyways, at the library now, and the first ever NZ team (1904) wore white tops, black shots and black socks. Same in 1905.

1927-1967 was black tops, white shorts, black socks (same as your post), though NZ wore white/black/black at home in 1948 (this may have been an allowance for the dark-shirted Australian team. I don't know whether or not "home team gets first dibs on kit" was in effect then). 1947 was all black. 1965-66 has a photo at the Basin with white shorts, white socks, and black/white stripes (a la Newcastle's top) against England.

Nothing on the 70's, and everything after 1981 is obvious.

So while black was dominant for at least a forty year period (I can't speak for the 10's or 70's), white was the original. That reason alone doesn't make it more important than the black kit (ie Wellington rep rugby started off in red and blue, yet I see no reason to change from black and gold), but that + 1982 (and for that matter, the amazing efforts of our girls last year - NZ football isn't just the senior mens team).

Both colours have significant places in NZ footballing history - black in quantity, white in quality. Considering all of NZ's signicant success has been in white, and is currently white, and is associated in the general community as white, I'd stick with the status quo but insist our away kits stay black.

TBH I wouldn't mind compromising - reverting to the original & pre-"All Whites" white kit with black shorts and socks, with out alternate being black shirts, white shorts and white/black socks. That way the name All Whites can stay (even if only in an unofficial, White Noise endorsed capacity), more black can be included instead of just as trim, and we avoid having alternate kit colours that aren't official (such as recent blue, or previous reds and greens).

Also, 100% black looks terrible The best All Blacks uniforms were the ones with white collars.
Like that idea, although the change strip might not contrast enough, perhaps we should stick to blue or something (and does anyone have images they can share of old NZF strips?)
 
 
Black and white stripes is interesting also...
You know we belong together...

Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Feverish wrote:
cheers for that Robb. Can you do my essay whilst your there too..


Should I spill beer on it, so that the marker think it's your own work?
Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Oska wrote:

Black and white stripes is interesting also...


Were not Newcastle Gangsta!2009-05-15 23:22:41
Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Oska wrote:
Black and white stripes is interesting also...


Something like this Oska?



Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Remember when the All Whites played Wales a couple of years back - we drew - siggie scored. The "All Whites" played in Blue and the wales played in White - how confusing is that.
I really think we should do away with the All White name - nothing wrong with being called New Zealand.
Also in football you do play in alternate strips more than other sports. I don't mind the team playing in white, the black shirt looks good, so does the blue strip bt lets get rid of the name. Why does every NZ sporting team have to have a nick name, I dont know any other country that does it as oftern as here.
Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I think you mean Smeltz scored both.
Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
chchnix wrote:
I really think we should do away with the All White name - nothing wrong with being called New Zealand.[/QUOTE] [QUOTE=chchnix]
...every NZ sporting team have to have a nick name....
That's it, it is just a nick name to refer to the side, far easier to refer to than the National/New Zealand Football Team.
You know we belong together...

Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
el grapadura wrote:
Oska wrote:
Black and white stripes is interesting also...


Something like this Oska?



As long as it's all black other than a few narrow white stripes I think It would make a realy cool 2nd kit.
 
Is that Oli? Trying to out my observational skills to the test...
You know we belong together...

Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Nah, that's the Magpie star Luke.
Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Jahahoaxze Oska2009-05-16 21:56:25
You know we belong together...

Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Glad to see reason has prevailed

I imagine we'd be wearing black against Botswana and possibly Iraq, other than that we're sticking to the true home kit
Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Wonder if FVH's statement had anything to do with what was being said on this thread.
Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
   Oh well. This year, of all years, it is more important that the team and NZ football supporters don't get sidetracked by an issue as insignificant as what colours the team is wearing. All that matters is that they qualify for South Africa!
Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
when we played at the ROF they had us as the Thai (Airways) All Whites. Even using TAW on the scoreboard (until half time anyway after the Fever Zone was chanting 'come on Taiwan')
 
Thai New Zealand doesnt quite work

Founder

Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Thai Blacks has RING to it.
Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Black Thai?

Or is it just smart casual?

Incredible stamina. No shame. Yellow Fever.

Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Great decision from NZ Football to leave it as the All Whites
Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
jamesnz wrote:
Great decision from NZ Football to leave it as the All Whites





Cop out by NZF.





Supporter world's best and worst football teams: Waikato/WaiBop, Kingz, Knights, Phoenix, The Argyle, The Whites & the All Whites

Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Feverish wrote:
when we played at the ROF they had us as the Thai (Airways) All Whites. Even using TAW on the scoreboard (until half time anyway after the Fever Zone was chanting 'come on Taiwan')
 
Thai New Zealand doesnt quite work
+1, imagine us going to the world cup with another nation's name in our title...
You know we belong together...

Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Maybe we should have it as follows:

Home Strip: All White
Away Strip: All Blue
Tournament or Alternative Strip: All Black

That will confuse them.

Fever zone chanting "Come on Taiwan?" Thai is short for Thailand not Taiwan. That is funny.

Imagine when we play Thailand, it would be totally confusing.

We would have to chant "We are the real Thailand"
Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Maybe we should have it as follows:

Home Strip: All White
Away Strip: All Blue
Tournament or Alternative Strip: All Black

That will confuse them.

Fever zone chanting "Come on Taiwan?" Thai is short for Thailand not Taiwan. That is funny.

Imagine when we play Thailand, it would be totally confusing.

We would have to chant "We are the real Thailand"
 
there is no W in Thailand so that wouldnt have made sense. Was either Taiwan or Tawa. When they changed it was "We're not Taiwan any more"

Founder

Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Maybe we should have it as follows:

Home Strip: All White
Away Strip: All Blue
Tournament or Alternative Strip: All Black

That will confuse them.

Fever zone chanting "Come on Taiwan?" Thai is short for Thailand not Taiwan. That is funny.

Imagine when we play Thailand, it would be totally confusing.

We would have to chant "We are the real Thailand"
I want black wth white pinstripes as 2nd kit myself
You know we belong together...

Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Im not big on the black kit. I love the all white kit and the blue kit that we wore against Wales. looks much better than the balck one.
Permalink Permalink
almost 17 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

Sorry have to disagree, the black one is class.

You know we belong together...

Permalink Permalink