All Whites, Ferns, and other international teams

New Zealand U-23s - Quali Whites

5835 replies · 1,102,368 views
over 10 years ago

Rusty Dunks wrote:

Hard News wrote:

Rusty Dunks wrote:

One man's negligence is another man's calculated risk......I've heard that this sort of thing happens more often than any hipster might think, as no one really ever bothers to investigate such things at age group level.

Kinda like opening with Dipak Patel at the 92 World Cup.

If you do that you need to balance the risk vs the reward and from what has been proven there are no rewards and all risk.  

  • NZ football look incompetent
  • We don't go to Rio
  • The media have a stick to beat our sport with
  • Wynne has suffered embarassment
  • OFC scored points on us
  • We have a hefty lawyers bill to fight what on the surface looks an unwinnable battle

vs

  • Deklan Wynne doesn't play for NZ and some other person does

That is some pretty shark maths if you calculated that that Reward outweighed the risk.

No-one ever said the calculations were sound :)

The only reason why NZF look incompetent is because NZF are incompetent, and have been for decades.....I don't blame OFC or the Island nations for getting fudgeed off with us at all. We act like petulant children most of the time towards OFC, from no real position of strength, we're like that fat kid in the sandpit who knocks all the other kids into the cats wee, and then cries when someone calls us up on it.

I want the All Whites to do well at Senior Men's World Cups (not just make them). But I'm all for the Island nations getting to go to the world stage at age group level in a normal WC cycle. It will help them get exposure and grow the game in their own countries. They might even get a player or two picked up on pro contracts. All of which indirectly helps the AWs by giving us sterner opposition.......and an occasional bloody nose might even make us more humble.

It's not an us vs them scenario here.....NZF fudgeed up, NZF should put their hands up like adults, learn from it and move on. No need, on NZF's behalf, to go scurrying for lawyers and deflecting....and if they can do that, then there is no need on our behalf for the lynch mob and effigies.....

Why would you want that - we are better than all of the island nations at football at every age group.  If you think NZF is the problem in the OFC I suggest you do a it more digging.

Normo's coming home

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

Who's paying for all these sets of Lawyers to look into this debacle?

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago · edited over 10 years ago · History

james dean wrote:

[/quote]

Why would you want that - we are better than all of the island nations at football at every age group.  If you think NZF is the problem in the OFC I suggest you do a it more digging.

We're not THE problem, we're A problem......

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

one_eyed_nik wrote:

Who's paying for all these sets of Lawyers to look into this debacle?

 

You are. Through your subs.

But I like to think that spending money on lawyers is always an investment ;)

Incredible stamina. No shame. Yellow Fever.

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

TopLeft07 wrote:

Smithy wrote:

Hard News wrote:

It probably gets you Smithy.  I rest my case.

 

I work for about $400 a week.

That's just your Yellow Fever wages #spendup

Hang on, we are still paying Smithy even though he resigned? This is a far bigger fudgeup than #WynneGate.

Yellow Fever - Misery loves company

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

BBL wrote:

I personally, think it comes down to how Article 7, clause 'd' has been interpreted. It's too open to interpretation and places no restriction on players who are younger than 18 when they obtain citizenship. What it says is that if a player obtains citizenship after turning 18, he has to live on the territory for five years to become eligible for the national team.

I don't think that's the case - it makes no reference to when the citizenship was obtained at all, it just says "He has lived continuously for at least five years after reaching the age of 18 an the territory of the relevant Association." So regardless of when the citizenship was obtained, you've got to be at least 23 before playing for your new team.

And as has been pointed out, this really doesn't seem fair to guys like Wynne. As has also been pointed out, you can apply for exemptions to this rule though (Zalalem being a recent example).

I was summising it in conjunction with the need for permanent citizenship in Article 5.1. It seems typical, that if a player is a citizen of a country before 18, FIFA allow them to turn out for the national team. Raheem Sterling is probably the most famous example, born in Jamaica, moved to England as a child with no ties to the country and was playing for them in 2009.

I don't think there's such a thing as exemption, it's not mentioned anywhere.

I think the Zelalem issue was misreported, there was never an exemption. What happened was he played for Germany youth teams in friendly games and his father became a US citizen which also granted him US citizenship as he was under 18. It was then at that point that he became eligible for USA as he wasn't tied down with Germany. Had he have played a competitive game for Germany, it would have been a different story.

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

Sterling is an exception under the Home Nations agreement which FIFA has approved.

Despite having lived in England since the age of five, Sterling was initially only eligible to represent Jamaica at international level. It was not until September 2009 that FIFA agreed to the proposals by the English, Northern Irish, Scottish and Welsh Football Associations to update the "home nations agreement", allowing players who were educated in their nation for five years or more to become eligible for their national team.[52] Sterling first represented England at under-16 level in November 2009 in a match against Northern Ireland.[53] When speaking of the possibility of playing for Jamaica, Sterling said: "When it comes to that decision, that is when I will decide, but if Jamaica calls for me, why not?"[54]

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

BBL wrote:

I don't think there's such a thing as exemption, it's not mentioned anywhere.

I think the Zelalem issue was misreported, there was never an exemption. What happened was he played for Germany youth teams in friendly games and his father became a US citizen which also granted him US citizenship as he was under 18. It was then at that point that he became eligible for USA as he wasn't tied down with Germany. Had he have played a competitive game for Germany, it would have been a different story.

That's not true at all. He wasn't eligible as soon as he received his US citizenship, he had to apply for the exemption.

http://www.espnfc.com.au/united-states/story/22680...


Yellow Fever - Misery loves company

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

Hard News wrote:

If my subs are paying then I demand a James Dean and Smithy legal team right now.

I'd pay extra just for the lolz.

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago · edited over 10 years ago · History

We've seen a nice bump in forum traffic thanks to this thread.


Yellow Fever - Misery loves company

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

From an article on the main page:

Martin said he could not name other players potentially affected or the number now under the spotlight. Decisions about eligibility for New Zealand were made by a "technical committee" who would check a player's passport and terms against criteria, he said.

I sure would like to know who is part of this technical committee...


VUW AFC - Victoria University Football for life

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

patrick478 wrote:

We've seen a nice bump in forum traffic thanks to this thread.

Best off season distraction ever!

Oi Oi Edgecumbe... lets have a clean sheet

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

patrick478 wrote:

TopLeft07 wrote:

Smithy wrote:

Hard News wrote:

It probably gets you Smithy.  I rest my case.

 

I work for about $400 a week.

That's just your Yellow Fever wages #spendup

Hang on, we are still paying Smithy even though he resigned? This is a far bigger fudgeup than #WynneGate.

It's now an honourium 

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago · edited over 10 years ago · History

From an article on the main page:

Martin said he could not name other players potentially affected or the number now under the spotlight. Decisions about eligibility for New Zealand were made by a "technical committee" who would check a player's passport and terms against criteria, he said.

I sure would like to know who is part of this technical committee...

According to Chopah (earlier this thread, post 1963) she resigned from NZF a couple of months ago.

"At the end of the drive the lawmen arrive...

I'll take my chance because luck is on my side or something...

Her name is Rio, she don't need to understand...

Oh Rio, Rio, hear them shout across the land..."

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

From an article on the main page:

Martin said he could not name other players potentially affected or the number now under the spotlight. Decisions about eligibility for New Zealand were made by a "technical committee" who would check a player's passport and terms against criteria, he said.

I sure would like to know who is part of this technical committee...

Andrew Gourdie has been hassling OFC on twitter about who was on the panel who made the decision to disqualify us. Wouldn't mind if he hassled NZF with your question too

Fuck this stupid game

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

el grapadura wrote:

Hard News wrote:

If my subs are paying then I demand a James Dean and Smithy legal team right now.

I'd pay extra just for the lolz.

But we want to pay less than $400 an hour. If we are getting monkeys, we really need to be paying peanuts :)
Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago · edited over 10 years ago · History

WARNING: This may be too soon after Wynnegate to watch. 

He gets name checked pretty hard with footage - maybe a light bulb moment for someone in the Pacific?

I guess NZF have to soldier on like we are going to Rio.

Game 1. vs Fiji plus Roy of the Phoenix

Game 2. vs Aussie 23

Game 3. A tour of Brazil so the team hasn't really missed out and football mums are happy.

#Eligible Alignment.

"Ufuk with the Club, Ufuk with the Country".

 If your girlfriend's got gloves, she's a keeper.

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

TopLeft07 wrote:

From an article on the main page:

Martin said he could not name other players potentially affected or the number now under the spotlight. Decisions about eligibility for New Zealand were made by a "technical committee" who would check a player's passport and terms against criteria, he said.

I sure would like to know who is part of this technical committee...

Andrew Gourdie has been hassling OFC on twitter about who was on the panel who made the decision to disqualify us. Wouldn't mind if he hassled NZF with your question too

Is this how journalists conduct their research now? what happened to good old fashioned investigative journalism. Wouldn't that be great?
Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

From an article on the main page:

Martin said he could not name other players potentially affected or the number now under the spotlight. Decisions about eligibility for New Zealand were made by a "technical committee" who would check a player's passport and terms against criteria, he said.

I sure would like to know who is part of this technical committee...

http://www.3news.co.nz/sport/new-zealand-football-...

In this video, the camera focuses on men at the back of the room while mentioning the technical committee.

de Jong and another.

A fan is a fan.

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

yellowsite wrote:

From an article on the main page:

Martin said he could not name other players potentially affected or the number now under the spotlight. Decisions about eligibility for New Zealand were made by a "technical committee" who would check a player's passport and terms against criteria, he said.

I sure would like to know who is part of this technical committee...

http://www.3news.co.nz/sport/new-zealand-football-...

In this video, the camera focuses on men at the back of the room while mentioning the technical committee.

de Jong and another.

Anyone who knows FDJ will know the look on his face is the one when he is totally pissed off. 

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

el grapadura wrote:

Hard News wrote:

If my subs are paying then I demand a James Dean and Smithy legal team right now.

I'd pay extra just for the lolz.

But we want to pay less than $400 an hour. If we are getting monkeys, we really need to be paying peanuts :)

Unfortunately $400 is peanuts in the legal world!

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

Hard News wrote:

How much does 'getting into law' cost you Boxey?

Pleading the 5th on that one.

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

patrick478 wrote:

TopLeft07 wrote:

Smithy wrote:

Hard News wrote:

It probably gets you Smithy.  I rest my case.

 

I work for about $400 a week.

That's just your Yellow Fever wages #spendup

Hang on, we are still paying Smithy even though he resigned? This is a far bigger fudgeup than #WynneGate.

Smithy resigned? When?

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

He mostly retired at the end of last season but is still our lawyer and manages some commercial arrangements and the Fever 'technical committee'

How's my driving? - Whine here

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

From an article on the main page:

Martin said he could not name other players potentially affected or the number now under the spotlight. Decisions about eligibility for New Zealand were made by a "technical committee" who would check a player's passport and terms against criteria, he said.

I sure would like to know who is part of this technical committee...

Rob Pickstock and FDJ are 2 names I know of. I think Rob Sherman is another I believe. I am vague on it so do not take me as being of any credibility.

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

Regarding this 'we thought there was an issue with Wynne but decided 'fudge it' theme that's coming through, I thought that what Martin said was 'early advise from the lawyers was that if we applied and it was not given, we are stuffed'

That's not them saying 'we knew this'. That's the initial feedback from the lawyers that NZF have asked to look over their position  around this.

Do I have that right?

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

Hard News wrote:

He mostly retired at the end of last season but is still our lawyer and manages some commercial arrangements and the Fever 'technical committee'

Ok so who is running this ship then?

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

Jeff Vader wrote:

From an article on the main page:

Martin said he could not name other players potentially affected or the number now under the spotlight. Decisions about eligibility for New Zealand were made by a "technical committee" who would check a player's passport and terms against criteria, he said.

I sure would like to know who is part of this technical committee...

Rob Pickstock and FDJ are 2 names I know of. I think Rob Sherman is another I believe. I am vague on it so do not take me as being of any credibility.

Gotta feel sorry for Fred (or not). He has the demeanour of someone who might be referred to as 'the defendant'.

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago · edited over 10 years ago · History

Jeff Vader wrote:

Regarding this 'we thought there was an issue with Wynne but decided 'fudge it' theme that's coming through, I thought that what Martin said was 'early advise from the lawyers was that if we applied and it was not given, we are stuffed'

That's not them saying 'we knew this'. That's the initial feedback from the lawyers that NZF have asked to look over their position  around this.

Do I have that right?

Yeah, pretty much. But guess the point here is - there was clearly awareness that there may be an issue around Wynn's eligibility at NZF (i.e. it's not an oversight, or them simply being unaware of this being an issue at all). The legal advice (wrongly, I think) said FIFA may not make him eligible and that could be it - and in light of that advice, they proceeded to play him anyway, without clarification from FIFA. And furthermore, they've now publically admitted to that situation.

You'd have thought in light of that legal advice, you'd want FIFA to clarify the situation, and  you wouldn't play Wynn in the meantime and endanger your whole campaign.

So now them saying - 'oh, yes, he's clearly eligible' sounds hollow, and their decision to play him in spite of uncertainty around eligibility, and without contacting FIFA in relation to it, is pretty unlikely to endear NZF and their position to FIFA if the latter end up having to make a definitive ruling on this.

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

I hope FDJ doesn't lose his job- he might end up doing more commentary

Founder

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

patrick478 wrote:

We've seen a nice bump in forum traffic thanks to this thread.

Did you leak Wynne's details to Vanuatu in order to get more traffic through this site for the Adidas ads? NZF's kit supplier is Nike too. Coincidence?

People like Coldplay and voted for the Nazis. You can't trust people.

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

Jeff Vader wrote:

From an article on the main page:

Martin said he could not name other players potentially affected or the number now under the spotlight. Decisions about eligibility for New Zealand were made by a "technical committee" who would check a player's passport and terms against criteria, he said.

I sure would like to know who is part of this technical committee...

Rob Pickstock and FDJ are 2 names I know of. I think Rob Sherman is another I believe. I am vague on it so do not take me as being of any credibility.

 

Who is Rob Pickstock then? What's his background?

Incredible stamina. No shame. Yellow Fever.

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

Jeff Vader wrote:

Hard News wrote:

He mostly retired at the end of last season but is still our lawyer and manages some commercial arrangements and the Fever 'technical committee'

Ok so who is running this ship then?

 

News and Paddy mostly.

Incredible stamina. No shame. Yellow Fever.

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

el grapadura wrote:

Jeff Vader wrote:

Regarding this 'we thought there was an issue with Wynne but decided 'fudge it' theme that's coming through, I thought that what Martin said was 'early advise from the lawyers was that if we applied and it was not given, we are stuffed'

That's not them saying 'we knew this'. That's the initial feedback from the lawyers that NZF have asked to look over their position  around this.

Do I have that right?

Yeah, pretty much. But guess the point here is - there was clearly awareness that there may be an issue around Wynn's eligibility at NZF (i.e. it's not an oversight, or them simply being unaware of this being an issue at all). The legal advice (wrongly, I think) said FIFA may not make him eligible and that could be it - and in light of that advice, they proceeded to play him anyway, without clarification from FIFA. And furthermore, they've now publically admitted to that situation.

You'd have thought in light of that legal advice, you'd want FIFA to clarify the situation, and  you wouldn't play Wynn in the meantime and endanger your whole campaign.

So now them saying - 'oh, yes, he's clearly eligible' sounds hollow, and their decision to play him in spite of uncertainty around eligibility, and without contacting FIFA in relation to it, is pretty unlikely to endear NZF and their position to FIFA if the latter end up having to make a definitive ruling on this.

Yeah, I don't think that any way you spin it the "we were certain he was eligible" argument is compatible with the statement that they were concerned that if they asked FIFA the answer would be no. 

People like Coldplay and voted for the Nazis. You can't trust people.

Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago · edited over 10 years ago · History

The problem, as I see it, is the wording in 5.1 is not clear enough and has lead NZF to falsely believe Article 6 is valid for Wynne's case.

Instead of saying 'permanent nationality' it would be better to say 'primary' or 'first' nationality. ie the nationality you are entitled to when you're born.

Altering this wording makes it so much clearer that Article 6 is only referring to those players whose original nationality could entitle them to play for more than one country (eg US passport for Guam), and that Wynne's case clearly falls into Article 7.




Permalink Permalink
over 10 years ago

Smithy wrote:

Jeff Vader wrote:

From an article on the main page:

Martin said he could not name other players potentially affected or the number now under the spotlight. Decisions about eligibility for New Zealand were made by a "technical committee" who would check a player's passport and terms against criteria, he said.

I sure would like to know who is part of this technical committee...

Rob Pickstock and FDJ are 2 names I know of. I think Rob Sherman is another I believe. I am vague on it so do not take me as being of any credibility.

 

Who is Rob Pickstock then? What's his background?

http://www.nzfootball.co.nz/pickstock-takes-international-team-manager-role/

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink