All Whites, Ferns, and other international teams

NZ? Coaches

37 replies · 6,736 views
over 13 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

There are bugger all kiwi coaches at men's/ women's national level and also at federation level. Mostly Brits. Is this a bad thing? Is NZF to blame? Discuss

Founder

Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

Talk to Terry MBE, Herdman, they sound good, look good and only last a short time..

"Who ate all the pies"

Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

Herdman achieved some pretty impressive thins in the 10ish years he was here, definately value for money.

Terry was here for about 8 years I think and did some great work but was never really given the support or oppurtunites that he deserved. I was pretty disappointed he missed out on the FS Womens Fed job, so can't blame him looking elsewhere. 

Both were here for good stints and did good work, and certianly not what I'd call a short time, in fact Herdman probably could have left earlier but stayed. When he left you couldn't blame him for moving on, a great oppotunity and 5 years in changre of the national team is plenty

Achieve by Unity

Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

I was never a fan of Herdman but then when you look at the results he achieved and I think more importantly, the legacy of compiling a very young, experienced Football Ferns team, whom now mainly play professionally overseas, my opinion is not worth shit.

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

Wasn't Herdman one of the key authors behind Whole of Football plan too?

Kotahitanga. We are one.

Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

Yes his legacy is the whole of football plan.

  Supporter For Ever - Keep The Faith - Foundation Member - Never Lets FAX Get In The Way Of A Good Yarn

Permalink Permalink
over 13 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

With the majority of our game being amateur  and club funding being stretched it takes a genuine effort from individuals to finance decent accredited training and qualifications. Capital/central football have tried to make a minimum qualification level for central league compulsory, voted down as clubs canny force  volunteers to take time out.

  Supporter For Ever - Keep The Faith - Foundation Member - Never Lets FAX Get In The Way Of A Good Yarn

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago · edited almost 13 years ago · History

Herdman did a power of work and delivered the WoF plan. He was a massive loss. Bev has carried that programme on her shoulders since John left, and she is a gigantic loss as well.


It's all change at NZF HQ. Lots of departures in the last 6-12 months.


edit - because I don't know how to spell "whole."

Incredible stamina. No shame. Yellow Fever.

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

Hole of Football?


"Phoenix till they lose"

Posting 97% bollox, 8% lies and 3.658% genuine opinion. 

Genuine opinion: FTFFA

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

The CEO is the person to thank for this. I've heard that people are not enjoying working for him and he is a bit of a numpty.

Grant McKavanagh, what a joke. I have heard that Glading was not popular either.

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

*Very few CEO's have popularity as a KPI.

And no, not referring to NZF (as I've NFI), just pointing out that effective CEO's aren't necessarily popular.

 

(Very few is a number lower than one).

E + R + O

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

I think that's increasingly becoming untrue though surge. Likeability is a fairly important characteristic in a CEO or manager now. That doesn't mean they're a pushover, it just means those under them are more motivated to work for a CEO they like - so of course its important. 


Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago
Tegal wrote:

I think that's increasingly becoming untrue though surge. Likeability is a fairly important characteristic in a CEO or manager now. That doesn't mean they're a pushover, it just means those under them are more motivated to work for a CEO they like - so of course its important. 

I'm not saying it isn't important at all - just that it is rarely a focus. I work well for people I respect and trust... if I like them that's a bonus... but then - how many narciccists are there CEO's... lots... are they successful? Often... likeable? Hell no!
E + R + O

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

Yeah I agree. I do think that's starting to change though. (Says the 25 year old with little experience)


Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

I remember hearing about a study done on CEO's and apparently over half are basically narciccists, apparently the most common train amongst all CEO's was their ruthlessness to get what needed to get done, done.

Only difference between them was some of them enjoyed being wankers, whilst the other half just took it as an unfortunate part of  the job.

You can't be everyones friend.

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago
Tegal wrote:

Yeah I agree. I do think that's starting to change though. (Says the 25 year old with little experience)

Many more managers (and CEO's by extension) are falling into the Theory Y bucket instead of the Theory X bucket these days.

Yellow Fever - Misery loves company

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

I have no issue with the fact that popularity is not a KPI. I do think though that in small sports business like NZ, it's more of a requirement than large sports business US/UK...

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago
Jeff Vader wrote:

The CEO is the person to thank for this. I've heard that people are not enjoying working for him and he is a bit of a numpty.

Grant McKavanagh, what a joke. I have heard that Glading was not popular either.

Dont believe everything you hear, in both those cases you've heard wrong.

A dog with a bone :)

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

My good source at NZF says otherwise.

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

He seems like a reasonably guy, but how many people here love their boss?

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago
Feverish wrote:

There are bugger all kiwi coaches at men's/ women's national level and also at federation level. Mostly Brits. Is this a bad thing? Is NZF to blame? Discuss


Based on most English results i can think of at just about any level you care to name - I  sincerely hope we have more non British coaches coming through.
Is NZF to blame - in part, but it's part of our colonial heritage/baggage. 
Hopefully we'll see more kiwi coaches learning from non Brit coaches.

Kotahitanga. We are one.

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

Interestingly enough, I believe that is one of the reasons Ricki was as popular as he was as both the Phoenix Coach and the All Whites coach was that he was basically the first in a high profile position that did not speak with a "Foreign" accent 

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago
sthn.jeff wrote:

Interestingly enough, I believe that is one of the reasons Ricki was as popular as he was as both the Phoenix Coach and the All Whites coach was that he was basically the first in a high profile position that did not speak with a "Foreign" accent 

Apart from Wynton at the Kingzzzzzzz.... although I guess that wasn't really high profile :P

People like Coldplay and voted for the Nazis. You can't trust people.

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago
Jeff Vader wrote:

My good source at NZF says otherwise.

I guess my sources are better and more happy in their jobs than your source.

A dog with a bone :)

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago
sthn.jeff wrote:

Interestingly enough, I believe that is one of the reasons Ricki was as popular as he was as both the Phoenix Coach and the All Whites coach was that he was basically the first in a high profile position that did not speak with a "Foreign" accent 



The first Kiwi coach ever I believe.

If you are old and wise you were probably young and stupid

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago


Ginette McDonald for Ernie's voice coach asap.

"At the end of the drive the lawmen arrive...

I'll take my chance because luck is on my side or something...

Her name is Rio, she don't need to understand...

Oh Rio, Rio, hear them shout across the land..."

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago
Leggy wrote:
sthn.jeff wrote:

Interestingly enough, I believe that is one of the reasons Ricki was as popular as he was as both the Phoenix Coach and the All Whites coach was that he was basically the first in a high profile position that did not speak with a "Foreign" accent 



The first Kiwi coach ever I believe.


faaark, good point leggy

it should be a pre-requisite from now on

sorry embers

360footballnews.com

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago · edited almost 13 years ago · History
Feverish wrote:

There are bugger all kiwi coaches at men's/ women's national level and also at federation level. Mostly Brits. Is this a bad thing? Is NZF to blame? Discuss


Yes, I think it is a problem for 3 reasons.  

1, British coaching traditions are increasingly outdated (note, not getting stuck into British coaches because they are British, talking about traditional methods and sought after player attributes that don't tally with the way game is played today).  

2, British coaching has always been very anti-intellectual and that is reflected I think in a resistance in coaching in NZ to get formal qualifications or take formal instruction on coaching.  Many think the only qualification you need to coach is to have played the game at a decent level.  It's pretty clear that countries with better educated coaches are better at youth development.  

3, British coaching is itself in crisis - look at the recent furore around the U21s which is symptomatic of problems with football in Britain.  We have to some extent imported those same problems with British coaches (lack of technique/tactical coaching, focus on physicality and size, belief that "hard work" and "desire" on their own will win football matches).

Clearly this doesn't hold for everyone but personally I think you can trace a lot of it back to the British influence within NZF.

Normo's coming home

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago
james dean wrote:
Feverish wrote:

There are bugger all kiwi coaches at men's/ women's national level and also at federation level. Mostly Brits. Is this a bad thing? Is NZF to blame? Discuss


Yes, I think it is a problem for 3 reasons.  

1, British coaching traditions are increasingly outdated (note, not getting stuck into British coaches because they are British, talking about traditional methods and sought after player attributes that don't tally with the way game is played today).  

2, British coaching has always been very anti-intellectual and that is reflected I think in a resistance in coaching in NZ to get formal qualifications or take formal instruction on coaching.  Many think the only qualification you need to coach is to have played the game at a decent level.  It's pretty clear that countries with better educated coaches are better at youth development.  

3, British coaching is itself in crisis - look at the recent furore around the U21s which is symptomatic of problems with football in Britain.  We have to some extent imported those same problems with British coaches (lack of technique/tactical coaching, focus on physicality and size, belief that "hard work" and "desire" on their own will win football matches).

Clearly this doesn't hold for everyone but personally I think you can trace a lot of it back to the British influence within NZF.

100% agreement with this. They struggle at the top side to get an Englishman and Hodgson is out of his depth I believe. When you look at their EPL set up and the obvious numbers of 'non English' coaches, I think it's quite obvious English coaching is in a crisis. Continental coaches are in vogue because their teams play football.

On the flip side to that, when you look at the Olympic team and Nelsens comments, and how they played against Jordan, Emblem is a bit different from that typical English coach. His teams play football and look good doing it too.

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago
Jeff Vader wrote:
james dean wrote:
Feverish wrote:

There are bugger all kiwi coaches at men's/ women's national level and also at federation level. Mostly Brits. Is this a bad thing? Is NZF to blame? Discuss


Yes, I think it is a problem for 3 reasons.  

1, British coaching traditions are increasingly outdated (note, not getting stuck into British coaches because they are British, talking about traditional methods and sought after player attributes that don't tally with the way game is played today).  

2, British coaching has always been very anti-intellectual and that is reflected I think in a resistance in coaching in NZ to get formal qualifications or take formal instruction on coaching.  Many think the only qualification you need to coach is to have played the game at a decent level.  It's pretty clear that countries with better educated coaches are better at youth development.  

3, British coaching is itself in crisis - look at the recent furore around the U21s which is symptomatic of problems with football in Britain.  We have to some extent imported those same problems with British coaches (lack of technique/tactical coaching, focus on physicality and size, belief that "hard work" and "desire" on their own will win football matches).

Clearly this doesn't hold for everyone but personally I think you can trace a lot of it back to the British influence within NZF.

100% agreement with this. They struggle at the top side to get an Englishman and Hodgson is out of his depth I believe. When you look at their EPL set up and the obvious numbers of 'non English' coaches, I think it's quite obvious English coaching is in a crisis. Continental coaches are in vogue because their teams play football.


On the flip side to that, when you look at the Olympic team and Nelsens comments, and how they played against Jordan, Emblem is a bit different from that typical English coach. His teams play football and look good doing it too.



Sir AF falls into this category.

If you are old and wise you were probably young and stupid

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

Ah right. Sorry I was meaning English coaches. Not British.

I'm not sure if I would lump the Welsh, Scottish and Irish in with the English as being the same purely because I don't know enough to have an opinion on them

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

Also, naming one exception hardly disproves the rule. 


Allegedly

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

You are right, it does not. I wasn't trying to disprove what JD wrote more that I think there can be exceptions and its dangerous to say 'all English coaches are this way' although the exceptions a few and far between.

I think Emblen (I'll eventually spell his name right) is crafting together a nice little coaching record. He went with younger players at Waitakere after Milicich and got some results with them (bought in Sole, Lucas, de Vries, etc) had the Olys playing well and the A team looked good in patches. 

I think I would be tempted to bring him into the fold to work with the youth. He is an ex pro whom played at a high level in the UK. In some respects, his coaching record/playing record is stronger than Greenies.

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago
james dean wrote:
Feverish wrote:

There are bugger all kiwi coaches at men's/ women's national level and also at federation level. Mostly Brits. Is this a bad thing? Is NZF to blame? Discuss


Yes, I think it is a problem for 3 reasons.  

1, British coaching traditions are increasingly outdated (note, not getting stuck into British coaches because they are British, talking about traditional methods and sought after player attributes that don't tally with the way game is played today).  

2, British coaching has always been very anti-intellectual and that is reflected I think in a resistance in coaching in NZ to get formal qualifications or take formal instruction on coaching.  Many think the only qualification you need to coach is to have played the game at a decent level.  It's pretty clear that countries with better educated coaches are better at youth development.  

3, British coaching is itself in crisis - look at the recent furore around the U21s which is symptomatic of problems with football in Britain.  We have to some extent imported those same problems with British coaches (lack of technique/tactical coaching, focus on physicality and size, belief that "hard work" and "desire" on their own will win football matches).

Clearly this doesn't hold for everyone but personally I think you can trace a lot of it back to the British influence within NZF.


+ another 1
Look at Australia. How many ex Brit lower league 'pros' are coaching national youth teams etc? We need to take our coaching development lead from Europe or South America or Asia (Japan) AND invest in home-grown.

Kotahitanga. We are one.

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago · edited almost 13 years ago · History
james dean wrote:


Yes, I think it is a problem for 3 reasons.  

1, British coaching traditions are increasingly outdated (note, not getting stuck into British coaches because they are British, talking about traditional methods and sought after player attributes that don't tally with the way game is played today).  

2, British coaching has always been very anti-intellectual and that is reflected I think in a resistance in coaching in NZ to get formal qualifications or take formal instruction on coaching.  Many think the only qualification you need to coach is to have played the game at a decent level.  It's pretty clear that countries with better educated coaches are better at youth development.  

3, British coaching is itself in crisis - look at the recent furore around the U21s which is symptomatic of problems with football in Britain.  We have to some extent imported those same problems with British coaches (lack of technique/tactical coaching, focus on physicality and size, belief that "hard work" and "desire" on their own will win football matches).

Clearly this doesn't hold for everyone but personally I think you can trace a lot of it back to the British influence within NZF.

[/quote]


How Germany went from bust to boom on the talent production line

[quote]The incredible depth of Germany's coaching resources, as well as the DFB's close relationship with Bundesliga clubs, helps to make the programme. According to Uefa, Germany has 28,400 (England 1,759) coaches with the B licence, 5,500 (895) with the A licence and 1,070 (115) with the Pro licence, the highest qualification. It is little wonder that Ashworth said last month that there will be no quick fix for English football. The country that invented the game has forgotten that we need people to teach it.

Quoting still broken

Permalink Permalink
over 12 years ago


MAGS v Sacred Heart @ midday this Saturday. K Fallon's mob v D Hay's mob. Come see if the future of NZ football looks promising. Talent scouts welcome. Bring your own lunch.

"At the end of the drive the lawmen arrive...

I'll take my chance because luck is on my side or something...

Her name is Rio, she don't need to understand...

Oh Rio, Rio, hear them shout across the land..."

Permalink Permalink