Early retirement
3.1K
·
34K
·
about 17 years
Marquee
260
·
5K
·
almost 17 years
Legend
2.1K
·
16K
·
about 17 years

Smeltz - three goals in last two AW games (the stand-out). Scoring for fun in A-League which is great for NZ football.

WeeNix
4
·
750
·
about 17 years
Stage Punch
2.1K
·
11K
·
over 16 years
Yeah but Smeltzie's team isn't playing in the Champion's League...

Killen for me.  Nelsen injured too much. 

Killy makes himself available for NZ too.
Marquee
560
·
7K
·
about 17 years
Not Nelsen, he's often injured and is never available.

Not Killen, he doesn't get enough game time and doesn't score enough goals.

My vote went to Smeltz. He scored two against Wales in a massive upset, and added one against Fiji. He is also a reliable goalscorer for the Phoenix. It's good for the NZ-based A-league team to have its top scorer a Kiwi.
Tegal Fan Club Member #3
46
·
7.8K
·
about 17 years
Not Nelsen, he's often injured and is never available.

Not Killen, he doesn't get enough game time and doesn't score enough goals.

My vote went to Smeltz. He scored two against Wales in a massive upset, and added one against Fiji. He is also a reliable goalscorer for the Phoenix. It's good for the NZ-based A-league team to have its top scorer a Kiwi.
 
 
what do you expect?
 
Skippy and Jar of vinegar of kitchen sink are just too good atm.
Starting XI
2
·
3.1K
·
about 17 years
smeltzy
 
bc he's the only one of the three my two rugby playing, 8 and 12 year old, nephews had heard of. and they even asked if he was going to be on the prem'ship highlights last night
Tegal
·
Head Sleuth
3K
·
19K
·
almost 17 years
killen = 2nd top goalscorer in the SPL is included in this year isnt it?
Marquee
560
·
7K
·
about 17 years

Not Nelsen, he's often injured and is never available. Not Killen, he doesn't get enough game time and doesn't score enough goals. My vote went to Smeltz. He scored two against Wales in a massive upset, and added one against Fiji. He is also a reliable goalscorer for the Phoenix. It's good for the NZ-based A-league team to have its top scorer a Kiwi.

�

�

what do you expect?

�

Skippy and Jar of vinegar of kitchen sink are just too good atm.


If Killen could get regular gametime and score many goals (be a better player than the two you mentioned), then I would have voted for him.
Marquee
46
·
8.2K
·
almost 17 years
Ryan Nelsen,

captain of an EPL club (injury problems, or not) is still a hell of an achievement

all 3 are helping raise the profile of football here and the profile of NZ in the wider football world

but Nelsen remains the standout for me, so close to an FA cup final - aaarghhh - that would have something the NZ media could not ignore!!!!!
WeeNix
51
·
500
·
about 17 years
I don't reckon Nelsen is "often injured and never available" (or are you meaning for NZ). He has played 84 games for Blackburn since he started with them, although he did obviously miss half a season with injury. I think Killen has been more injury prone in his career, unfortunately.

Both are doing amazingly well- so much so that I think a lot of people now take it for granted that Nelsen is the captain of a pretty successful premiership team, and it does not get the ongoing attention and recognition he deserves. Had Killen not been injured last part of last season, I think I would have voted for him- it was great to see a kiwi consistently scoring goals at a high level. It might be his for the taking next year as he more firmly establishes himself at Celtic.

anyway, while I think both of them are great, I voted for Smeltz. I think he has captured the imagination of the nz footballing public, and the Phoenix have created such a buzz that they have been the best thing for nz football this year- and Smeltz has been a major part of that.
Starting XI
2
·
3.1K
·
about 17 years
Shauneboy wrote:
I don't reckon Nelsen is "often injured and never available" (or are you meaning for NZ). He has played 84 games for Blackburn since he started with them, although he did obviously miss half a season with injury. I think Killen has been more injury prone in his career, unfortunately.

Both are doing amazingly well- so much so that I think a lot of people now take it for granted that Nelsen is the captain of a pretty successful premiership team, and it does not get the ongoing attention and recognition he deserves. Had Killen not been injured last part of last season, I think I would have voted for him- it was great to see a kiwi consistently scoring goals at a high level. It might be his for the taking next year as he more firmly establishes himself at Celtic.

anyway, while I think both of them are great, I voted for Smeltz. I think he has captured the imagination of the nz footballing public, and the Phoenix have created such a buzz that they have been the best thing for nz football this year- and Smeltz has been a major part of that.
Ditto
Marquee
3.7K
·
5.8K
·
about 17 years
tigers wrote:
Ryan Nelsen,

captain of an EPL club (injury problems, or not) is still a hell of an achievement

all 3 are helping raise the profile of football here and the profile of NZ in the wider football world

but Nelsen remains the standout for me, so close to an FA cup final - aaarghhh - that would have something the NZ media could not ignore!!!!!
Nelsen for me as well,I thought it was for the year and not just the last few months.Agree Smeltz has done well but really in what 2 All Whites games and a handful of Phoenix games while Nelson has had his injury troubles he played a shyte load of games in the year being voted for and as stated captained an EPL team.
Starting XI
2.1K
·
4.8K
·
almost 17 years
Yeah its the last 12 months and for me Killy has been stand out.  Nelsen, solid but probably not quite as impressive whereas Smeltz has had one hell of a purple patch.
WeeNix
4
·
750
·
about 17 years
I don't think its going to be an easy decision for NZF!
Trialist
0
·
3
·
over 16 years
If Nelson is back in NZ for the awards dinner (Nov 19), and uninjured, do you think he will turn out for the All Whites on Nov 21 vs Vanuatu?
Starting XI
2
·
3.1K
·
about 17 years
Megan-Adel wrote:
If Nelson is back in NZ for the awards dinner (Nov 19), and uninjured, do you think he will turn out for the All Whites on Nov 21 vs Vanuatu?
 
nelsen will only be at the awards if he IS playing for the AWs - so i dont think we get too excited yet.
 
Football NZ putting optimistic spin on his presence. they should just say nothing rather than continue to create expectation - and then perhaps we might all get a nice surprise
 
Would be great to see him though. here's hoping
Legend
2.4K
·
17K
·
about 17 years
Have to go for Killen. One of the leading scorers in the SPL last season and although he hasn't had too much game time so far at Celtic he's still managed to break his duck there and has played in more than one CL match for more than just a passing few minutes.
Marquee
880
·
7.3K
·
about 17 years
This award is for the calendar year - Killen was injured from December last season through to about June, so has played about 5 games in the time period.  One of them was for the AW's (against Fiji) and he was poor.
 
We cannot give the award to people who haven't really played but are at big clubs - if we are doing that, we should remove smeltz and put in Simon Elliott.
Phoenix Academy
0
·
440
·
over 16 years

only one out of three has played in the champions league this year and he started against benfica.. so my vote is for killen

rodfarva2007-11-07 13:32:01
First Team Squad
500
·
1.9K
·
about 17 years
You can't go for Smeltz he's lucky to be nominated considering what league he plays in. Nelsen or Killen I don't reallycare but I gave Killed my vote.
Phoenix Academy
0
·
280
·
over 16 years
Was there anyone else on the list before it got trimmed to these three? How can Smeltz be the leading vote getter in this? Last season he was plaiying in the conference... and this year he is in the 'A League' which is no where near the standard that Nelsen and Killen have been playing. It has to be Killen - playing for the best team, getting playing time in Europe.
If the list was 10 would there be any players from the nzfc in it? and what overseas based players would be on it?
 
For myne the rest of the nominations apart from the three previously named would be:
 
Chris James - Did well at Fulham and with the under 20s.
Kris Bright - Been playing in Europe and scoring goals for fun over there.
Rory Fallon - Another striker getting on the score sheet.
Ivan Vicelich - One of NZ's best exports playing at a great level in Holland.
Ben Sigmund - Breakout year for NZFC champs, All white international.
Jason Hayne - Won oceania, nzfc, chatham cup last season.
Andy Boyens - Playing in Toronto in MLS and doing great for them
feedback2007-11-07 20:41:21
Starting XI
2
·
3.1K
·
about 17 years
go smeltzy!!!!!!
 
he is winning bc the criteria are not clear and bc its not just about footballing ability or league you play in. ive voted for him bc he has done the most for the profile and cred of football in NZ this year (via his storming contribution for the phoenix and goals for the AWs).
 
Ryan is a legend and Killen has had a brilliant 15 or so months - no question. but nelsen would win it every year if it was based on footballing ability alone.
Starting XI
230
·
4.8K
·
about 17 years
choice and (ir)rationale.

  • Hibs and Celtic - green - that's a no no.
  •  Blackburn fans tried to give me a kicking after a Blackburn/PNE derby years ago.
  •   Shane plays for Phoenix.
Trialist
0
·
74
·
over 16 years
I cast my vote for killen,after for nelsen
Killen played a magnific season with hibs,and he was called in team by Celtic(one of the bests teams in Europe)
Nelsen was injured,but,now with Blackburn their are fifth in Premier league.
Phoenix Academy
0
·
360
·
almost 17 years
This might sound silly, but who would an Australian vote for? Ok, so Killen played in the Champions league, unfortunately, he was USELESS, and is probably going to be on his way out of Celtic in January. How can we vote for somebody who (granted is getting good money and played in some big games) is (as an Aussie might say) a loser at the moment. If the awards period covered the time where Killen was scoring like a madman for hibs than he would probably be a shoe in, but it doesn't, so he shouldn't win.

You have to give it to a winner, somebody who is performing week in, week out. Shane Smeltz is that man. He's been scoring goals like crazy, both in the A-League and for the All Whites. Surely that performance against Wales ranking as one of the best ever by a New Zealander.

As for Nelsen, why give it to him? He hasn't played for the national team in ages and probably won't even be at the awards ceremony. KTBW2007-11-09 19:58:41
Trialist
0
·
11
·
over 16 years
How could you even put Smeltz in the same breath as Nelsen, first of all hes playing in the english premier league and is also one of the better defenders in the league, captaining a european quality team? and Killen, also a striker like smeltz, that plays in the best club competition (Champions league) in the world and has proven himself as a goal scorer in the scottish premier league. You can in no way compare the a-league to these two leagues? also if smeltz was any good he wouldnt have been released from conference football in england.

I like feedbacks suggestion also...
My vote would go to KRIS BRIGHT as he has been playing in the dutch league which is definitly better quality than the a-league.
First Team Squad
500
·
1.9K
·
about 17 years
KTBW wrote:
This might sound silly, but who would an Australian vote for? Ok, so Killen played in the Champions league, unfortunately, he was USELESS, and is probably going to be on his way out of Celtic in January. How can we vote for somebody who (granted is getting good money and played in some big games) is (as an Aussie might say) a loser at the moment. If the awards period covered the time where Killen was scoring like a madman for hibs than he would probably be a shoe in, but it doesn't, so he shouldn't win.

You have to give it to a winner, somebody who is performing week in, week out. Shane Smeltz is that man. He's been scoring goals like crazy, both in the A-League and for the All Whites. Surely that performance against Wales ranking as one of the best ever by a New Zealander.

As for Nelsen, why give it to him? He hasn't played for the national team in ages and probably won't even be at the awards ceremony.
 
Killen if he was playing in the A-league would score goals like crazy. Your logic for giving it to Smeltz seems to be because he plays in the A-league and can get starts but Killen can't get starts playing in a much better competition.
Phoenix Academy
0
·
300
·
over 16 years
Smeltz wins this easy. Hes scoring goals in the A-League -has scored afew for the AW and would deffently be a target for a Euro club to nabb.
For a guy thats scoring goals and is playing Locally , ucant ask for more then that.
And the A-League is not some Bums league for has-beens.
First Team Squad
14
·
1.6K
·
about 17 years
Nelsen- Captaining an EPL side challenging for a top four position. The fact that he is captaining the team (obviously) means that he is one of the first names down on the coaches sheet. Couldn't say the same about Killen. Smeltzy is obviously class, but not the same class that the other two are part of. Nelsen will win hands down- and I can't understand how the hell Smeltzy's winning the poll (although agree with ML in that the guidelines for the award are pretty ambiguously defined).
Phoenix Academy
0
·
440
·
over 16 years
convict wrote:
Smeltz wins this easy. Hes scoring goals in the A-League -has scored afew for the AW and would deffently be a target for a Euro club to nabb.
For a guy thats scoring goals and is playing Locally , ucant ask for more then that.
And the A-League is not some Bums league for has-beens.
 
pretty sure smeltz isnt a huge target for european clubs..
Trialist
0
·
47
·
over 16 years
Havent read the criteria here, but if its lifting profile of the game locally, give it to Smeltz.
If we're talking about actual football ability then you have to give it to Nelsen.
Killen is playing for a BIG club, but he's not playing very often, and not scoring goals as a result. He had a storming year last year, and good on him for getting the Celtic contract. But like someone else said, there's every chance he will be released in January.
Nelsen is one of the best defenders in the EPL. He hasn't been playing that much, granted. But anyone who can be injured for long periods and walk straight back into a backline of a European contending EPL side (and grab back the armband) has my vote over someone who has scored a few (and it is only a few...) goals in the A League.
If someone offers Smeltz a European contract I will be happy to reconsider (one good game against Wales doesnt earn you a contract OR a title as the best footballer in NZ).
 
 
Phoenix Academy
0
·
360
·
over 16 years

Smeltz for goals for Phoenix and Wales. Nelsen hasn't done enough for NZ, and Killen has gone quiet recently

Starting XI
2.1K
·
4.8K
·
almost 17 years
slinger5 wrote:
How could you even put Smeltz in the same breath as Nelsen, first of all hes playing in the english premier league and is also one of the better defenders in the league, captaining a european quality team? and Killen, also a striker like smeltz, that plays in the best club competition (Champions league) in the world and has proven himself as a goal scorer in the scottish premier league. You can in no way compare the a-league to these two leagues? also if smeltz was any good he wouldnt have been released from conference football in england.

I like feedbacks suggestion also...
My vote would go to KRIS BRIGHT as he has been playing in the dutch league which is definitly better quality than the a-league.
 
Yeah but he's playing like third division, quality wise thats almost as sh*te as playing NZFC!

You’ll need an account to join the conversation!

Sign in Sign up