by work permit difficulties he means if a player of ours wants to go play in England or any other country that requires a work permit (think its just British countries) , he has to have played in 75% of national games in the past 2 years and be in one of the top 75 national teams in the world. I think thats the right figures anyway.
It doesn't matter until the national team has consistently stayed in the top 70 for two years. Seriously, after tough ranked match ups and after the Confederation Cup games are people thinking we are going to stay in the top 70??
We have a long road ahead. The only match that is worth anything is winning that play-off. We have to lose a few really tough games along the way to win that match or we would never likely to win if our mind is in the clouds.
This is a timely reminder of the lack of depth we have and how we need to work on the depth as well as strengthen our top 11 players. We can't expect to play the same 11 players due to normal circumstances and any weakness to the team by substitution will expose us big time by the 5th AFC team, so we need to strengthen our weak players enough so that we can't be exploited in the two leg play-offs.
We don't have as much mantainance on our top 11 players as the rest, just a couple of combination play that can be sorted in a couple of games during the confederation cup before the play-offs. In the meanwhile, with half the All Whites being in the Phoenix set up, which saves some time in making combination plays and having to secure strong friendly games against high ranked teams, we should be able to blood a few good players under less than a year at a high enough level.
Don't get to upset of this match result. It would be enough to work on their game.
Also, having a man down for half a match on debut is very psychological rather than numercial. If they learn about being a man or two short in a match, then they would be able to do some re-arrangements doing something different next time. Normally you can still play competitively by dropping one striker and leaving the target front man still because most of the match work is in the midfield. But if the opponents were able to push one of the defenders into the midfield, then it comes a tight possession game. however, dropping two front man is the other option into the possession game and that may open gaps in the opponent's defence as the attack can come from any of the midfield with their short passing possession game. Anyway, the details of that is a bit long so I wouldn't bother discussing it. But basically, if the numbers are against you, you have to focus on the tactic that is working well already and make it even better as well as securing long spells of possession.
I didn't see the game, but I heard that Fiji justed kicked and run and we were doing the short game but could not shot accurately.
Tbh. How much has the strikers being practicing on their crossbar to distance drills? It sounds like noone has bothered to put in enough work. They are usually a couple of hours a day until you master it so it then it ends up to be like 10 minutes of 95% accurate per day. Seriously, how many shots were on target or on post? They should be aiming towards 80% (like a Dan Carter conversion %) at this level. Btw why don't they produce that statistic during a soccer game?