2026 All Whites' World Cup Squad

762 replies · 39,340 views
2 months ago · edited 2 months ago · History
martinb wrote:
 durandurante wrote:
 martinb wrote:
 djtim3000 wrote:
 MetalLegNZ wrote:
Posted this in Woods thread...

Great to see, but a couple interesting chats at footy on Saturday around how the team (All Whites) play better without him. With him on the field the team looks too him too much, as if he is the only option.

I don't see us playing the way we did against Chile with Wood in the team - Interesting conundrum, does our best player suit our best system?
 
I think the answer is that we 'can' definitely be a better team with Wood on the field. Problem seems to be how we utilise him, as a central target striker its too easy for the opposition defence to mark him out of the game, and as a team we've only really used Woodsey as a target man. Get him dropping deeper in transition, holding up play, creating space for our fast and skillful wide players, and then get Wood popping up in the box rather than just wasteful balls played in to his head. Plus he's always a massive problem for oppositions at set pieces which will be important against stronger teams; you'd want him on the field whenever we can.
Sorry if this gets covered, but we have some troops for effective set pieces now. Both in delivery and getting on the end of the ball. 

Consider: Bindon, Boxall, Surman, Stamenic, Tuiloma, (Hughes), (De Jong), (Tommy Smith), Waine, Garbett all as potential beneficiaries of a Wood decoy run. 

And delivering Payne has been good, Bell, De Vries, Thomas, (Parker-Price), Singh, McCowatt, Just, Rufer. 

And McCowatt, Singh, Just, Wood, Randall, Garbett, et al mopping up or crumbing in the box, if you will

Stamenic, Rufer, Thomas and Bell volleying or driving shots from the top of the box. 

If we can win corners and free kicks, these are areas where we have a bit of control, and hopefully further results.
We have more options for set pieces these days, but also the ability to score outside of free kicks and corners. Of the AW's last 10 goals against non-OFC opposition (going back to the 1:1 draw against USA), only half of them have come from dead ball situations. 

Interestingly, of those 5 goals from open play, only one has occurred with Wood on the field - the one he scored against Australia at Mt Smart last year. Which might feed into the theory 'we play better without Wood'
I’ve been thinking about this. And Buffy saying we don’t have Morgan Gibbs-White, which is true. 

But perhaps we are a little restricted in how we attack with Wood on the field? We’re happy to sling low percentage crosses, more than attempt one touch etc etc?

Or we’ve been waiting for a settled injury free 11 to try to attempt something more creative? 
I don't think the AWs need to be super creative. Press hard without the ball, seek turnovers and quick transitions, but when we have the ball be patient, and seek to frustrate with our quality midfield. Some well planned dead ball setups. We saw it a bit with the Canberra match last year, Thomas's return to the AWs. The Socceroos genuinely surprised and frustrated as we dominated possession. Singh & McCowatt creating openings for Wood that he should have done better with in the first half.

And since then Just has gone on to have great season in the SPL. He will be high on confidence at the moment. McCowatt almost as good in Denmark. Randall a big mover as well.

Baze wants to at least trial Bell, Stamenic and Thomas as a starting trio in the warmups. How that goes will be a big part of determining how the AWs setup at the WC. Remembering Thomas doesn't create much these days, that's not really his game now. Only 1 goal, and 1 assist (and that a very generously given one) all Eredivise season at Zwolle.

If it all looks a bit toothless in the warmups, then Singh may come in as a starter and one of Marko or Ryan goes to the pine. Of that midfield trio I think Bell showed against Chile he must start. 
Permalink Permalink
2 months ago · edited 2 months ago · History
Poppa is not waiting for the ALM/European seasons to finish before starting preparations. Early training camp already unaware in Florida (from May 5th) - with only yes 8 players at this stage.

Wonder why Bazeley hasn't chosen Poppa's approach?
FIFA does provide financial support for pre-tournament training and expenses of $USD2.5 million per team after all!!

Baze could rustle up 8 or more World Cup picks already. Payne, Rufer, Singh, Barba, Garbett, Waine, Bindon, Cacace & Stamenic. Tuiloma, McGarry, Roux, Tommy Smith & Tzanev more borderline picks.  But that's 14. Old will have his last Ligue Two match this weekend, if St Etienne finish top two.  Thomas's Zwolle are now safe from relegation so as club legend & captain he could probably negotiate an early departure for possibly his only ever WC apperance.

A couple of gentle run arounds against say MLS Next Pro type opponents. Guys like Singh, Payne, Barba, Garbs, Smith and Cacace who haven't played much lately (if at all in Libby's case) could do with some actual match fitness. Invite in some Kiwis stateside like Troy Putt, Riley Bidois, Codey Phoenix, Thomas Raimbault to add some training numbers in the short term. Take over some others like LBS, Henry Gray, Dibley-Dias, hell even Piper for the experience. $USD2.5M should stretch a fair way.

The last thing I want to hear post the Iran game is, 'we were a bit rusty with the shortish pre tourney prep available', we will be better for this game blah blah blah.

Iran are already largely in camp. Not that they have much choice with their country at war. There is yes a small number of their likely WC squad like their best player Mehdi Taremi (Olympiacos, ex Inter Milan) still with their overseas clubs.

They may lack many known players, but you just feel that they are going to have the combinations and unity of a well drilled club side. Plus they have 40 days together now to analyse the individual AWs players inside out. All this why the AWs have a near dozen of their likely squad mucking about presumably just training at their clubs, hitting the gym or whatever.

Hopefully Baze knows best, but interesting that the Socceroos are already assembling, which gives off vibes of 'we are not just happy to be here, and we will leave no stone unturned to be the best prepared we can be'.

https://socceroos.com.au/news/commbank-socceroos-commence-fifa-world-cup-2026tm-pre-camp-sarasota-florida

The CommBank Socceroos will hold a World Cup pre-camp in Sarasota, Florida, before relocating to Los Angeles for a friendly match against co-hosts Mexico at the Rose Bowl in Pasadena on May 30.

Oakland, California, in the San Francisco Bay Area, will then become home for the Socceroos, with the Oakland Roots Sports Club - located on Bay Farm Island in Alameda - serving as the official Base Camp training site during the tournament.

The Socceroos’ final 26-player FIFA World Cup 2026™ squad is due to be announced on June 1.

Popovic will use the Sarasota camp to assess an extended number of players in a train-on squad, before finalising his selection.

Eight players will arrive in Sarasota this week for the Socceroos’ pre-training camp: Harry Souttar (Leicester City), Hayden Matthews (Portsmouth), Anthony Caceres (Macarthur FC), Mitchell Duke (Macarthur FC), Brandon Borrello (Western Sydney), Nick D’Agostino (Brisbane Roar), Nishan Velupillay (Melbourne Victory) and Mathew Leckie (Melbourne City).
Permalink Permalink
2 months ago · edited 2 months ago · History
It’s a pity in some ways that Bell or Singh didn’t play against Finland to test ourselves against a disciplined defensive press. 

Chile would have given us thoughts of starting Randall and running at opposition, with Bell, Randall, Waine and Barbarouses looking dangerous. Surely given his partnership with Elanga, Wood  and Randall could also get an understanding.

But Finland showed how horrible we can be without someone linking us together and buzzing all over the defense and taking responsibility. To link, keep moving forward and keep our pace up one of the top two mentioned seems essential or maybe Parker-Price at a pinch. 

No point having too many people capable of finding runners with long passes or playing a ball through the defense if we don’t have the runners to get on the end of it.

Bayliss would be something else, that I think he and Stamenic do well, which is carry the ball through the midfield, which is a different tactic to get momentum. As well as his confidence and shoot on sight policy, which tbh might not hurt us either.


Permalink Permalink
2 months ago
Wonder why Bazeley hasn't chosen Poppa's approach?

Because the guy is cosplaying as an international football manager. Any other serious WC coach is turning over every stone to eek out whatever slither of advantage they can over equally competitive opponents (the vast majority who had to beat quality teams to get there)

All I hear when Baze talks is 'what a great experience it will be for the lads' and how 'lucky he is to get to coach an international team and get to watch PL games for his job'. While i'm thrilled for him, this is not the make-a-wish foundation.


Permalink Permalink
2 months ago
durandurante wrote:
Wonder why Bazeley hasn't chosen Poppa's approach?

Because the guy is cosplaying as an international football manager. Any other serious WC coach is turning over every stone to eek out whatever slither of advantage they can over equally competitive opponents (the vast majority who had to beat quality teams to get there)

All I hear when Baze talks is 'what a great experience it will be for the lads' and how 'lucky he is to get to coach an international team and get to watch PL games for his job'. While i'm thrilled for him, this is not the make-a-wish foundation.



He's done well. Not a fair analysis.
Permalink Permalink
2 months ago
MetalLegNZ wrote:
 durandurante wrote:
Wonder why Bazeley hasn't chosen Poppa's approach?
 
Because the guy is cosplaying as an international football manager. Any other serious WC coach is turning over every stone to eek out whatever slither of advantage they can over equally competitive opponents (the vast majority who had to beat quality teams to get there)

All I hear when Baze talks is 'what a great experience it will be for the lads' and how 'lucky he is to get to coach an international team and get to watch PL games for his job'. While i'm thrilled for him, this is not the make-a-wish foundation.



 
He's done well. Not a fair analysis.

What has he done well out of interest?

Qualified for the World Cup? Should be qualifying, would be an embarrassment not to now.

Couple nice friendly wins over non-OFC opponents, plenty of shite defeats in friendlies against non-OFC opponents as well.

He's par at best, and that's being generous.

Three for me, and two for them.

Permalink Permalink
Endorsed by
duKhalil Media
2 months ago · edited 2 months ago · History
Pre the 2010 WC from 24th May we played Australia (Melbs), Serbia and Slovenia in Europe plus Chile in Sth Africa before the Slovakia WC game 15th June 2010. 
I'm guessing the squad had time together in NZ (sans European based players?) prior the Socerros warmup.

So lots of travel but double the warmup games compared to 2026.

Herbert was integrating completely new players Reid and Smith into the starting side, but hey that prep schedule seemed to work a treat. 

Will say that Australia have a lot of experience preparing for big tourneys like the WC and Asian Cups. Us not so much. Poppa himself played at 2006 WC

But hey every coach is different, plus NZF likely operating on a lower budget to Football Australia even with all that FIFA prep dosh.

Edit - will add that the Iranian game looms as likely must win, for the AWs to be any chance of getting out of their group. Iran have had to shut down their domestic league. Most of their squad will go into the WC, without playing alot of week in week out actual top level football. Though they apparently have 5 warmups planned before playing us in LA.

There are likely some divisions in their squad, some pro regime, some anti regime - as we saw with their womens team at the Asian Cup in Aussie. Their star striker Sardar Azmoun who plays in UAE, got dropped for their March games after posting stuff on Insta of him with Dubai's ruler.

Meanwhile Egypt drew with Spain in Spain (0-0) in March, and Belgium thrashed USA. Those loom as the tougher matches on paper.

The AWs have to be well prepared and totally hit the ground running, game 1 verus the Iranians in LA. No limited prep excuses.
Permalink Permalink
2 months ago
Two matches does seem a little limited.

Only real option is to start the top team in both games and likely sub after 60.



Auckland will rise once more

Permalink Permalink
about 2 months ago
24 names that I am extremely confident will make the squad:

Crocombe, Paulsen, Woud
Payne, Elliot
Boxall, Surman, Bindon, Pijnaker
Cacace, de Vries
Bell, Stamenic, Thomas, Rufer, Garbett
Just, McCowatt, Old, Singh, Randall
Wood, Kosta, Waine 

Singh & Garbett maybe a little bit lucky to make it but Baze has his favourites. One of OPP & Bayliss will take one of the remaining two spots. The other will go to Tuiloma or Smith.

Rogerson probably needed to, and didn't, have an absolute blinder tonight to make the squad, I think we can rule him out. Nobody else should really be particularly surprised/gutted that they don't make it. 
Permalink Permalink
Endorsed by
Antz
about 2 months ago
Rogerson has been dire this year and shouldn’t be any where near the squad.

Hopefully they have single hotel rooms as I wouldn’t want to room with Woud.

Auckland will rise once more

Permalink Permalink
about 2 months ago
AucklandPhoenix wrote:
Rogerson has been dire this year and shouldn’t be any where near the squad.

Hopefully they have single hotel rooms as I wouldn’t want to room with Woud.
Maybe thats why Smith is in the running still.

Valley FC til I die?

Permalink Permalink
about 2 months ago
imanixsupporter wrote:
24 names that I am extremely confident will make the squad:

Crocombe, Paulsen, Woud
Payne, Elliot
Boxall, Surman, Bindon, Pijnaker
Cacace, de Vries
Bell, Stamenic, Thomas, Rufer, Garbett
Just, McCowatt, Old, Singh, Randall
Wood, Kosta, Waine 

Singh & Garbett maybe a little bit lucky to make it but Baze has his favourites. One of OPP & Bayliss will take one of the remaining two spots. The other will go to Tuiloma or Smith.

Rogerson probably needed to, and didn't, have an absolute blinder tonight to make the squad, I think we can rule him out. Nobody else should really be particularly surprised/gutted that they don't make it. 
This is really very spot on. Taken the jeopardy out of it.

Pijnaker lucky to be there, but knows the team well. TBH, Payne and Elliot lucky to be there, but for some reason there’s less competition at RB. 

Think Tuiloma should go. The draw back with both Bayliss and OPP is that they don’t know their teammates well. Garbett probably lucky as both these guys have performed better than him this season. 

Singh has to go. Shown to be an x-factor player for us. 

Rogerson I’ve watched less this season, but still seems a tidy player, but worked with Mata better than Cosgrove. And imo would have more goals if de Vries hadn’t been out. Hardly done enough of late, but as he showed last season can score from distance or the box and can cross a ball. 


Permalink Permalink
about 2 months ago
I agree, the squad does kind of pick itself at this point. I think Bayliss will be unlucky to miss out but Baze is not dropping any of those guys who’ve been round the squad for years (Garbett, Rufer, etc.).

For me, I would find a spot for Luke Brook-Smith. He’d be my wildcard. 

In these World Cup games you often need a moment of magic and he’d be one player you maybe fancy to come on in the 78th minute and go on a mazy run, split the lines with a through ball or get forward on a counter attack. 

He had a very quiet season, no arguing with that but he still came up with few big moments off the bench. 

Also, he’s likely going to be a key player over the next 10-15 years so it would be a great learning.
Permalink Permalink
Endorsed by
Southernix
about 2 months ago
On Piney & Burgess' pod today they did the Tommy Smith chat again. Burgess is expecting he will get picked. Both seemed to be almost making the case for him being in the squad.

I can see the reasons why his presence would be beneficial but there is simply no argument for why he couldnt be equally as beneficial without being an official member of the 26. Piney and Burgess didn't address this angle and no journalist has put this to Bazeley either which is disappointing, I'd have liked to have heard Baze's response to having that put to him.

It is such nepotistic bullshit. I just feel so bad for whoever out of the likes of Bayliss, OPP, Tuiloma, McGarry, Roux, Rogerson, de Jong, LBS etc who misses out and will feel like they might have gone if it wasn't for Smith. 
Permalink Permalink
Endorsed by
AntzMarto
about 2 months ago
On TVNZ sports news,  there was the good old Baz with his white board and depth chart for each position. Saw Finn Conchies name there at the bottom of the midfielders!!

Wish I had been quick enough to see the central defenders.

Auckland will rise once more

Permalink Permalink
about 2 months ago · edited about 2 months ago · History
AucklandPhoenix wrote:
On TVNZ sports news,  there was the good old Baz with his white board and depth chart for each position. Saw Finn Conchies name there at the bottom of the midfielders!!

Wish I had been quick enough to see the central defenders.
Tommy smith (rightly) ranked the 7th choice CB
Bill T ahead of Nando
Sims at 3rd GK
FDV ahead of Libby
Old at Lw
Permalink Permalink
Endorsed by
AucklandPhoenixmartinbSouthernix
about 2 months ago
"Bindon played 26 games for United in all competitions, but missed the club’s last two fixtures because of an ankle injury."

That's a real concern. Especially since I rate him to start ahead of Payne at RB.

Only 1st 0r 2nd pick backline person that hasnt been injured of late is Surman??
Permalink Permalink
about 2 months ago · edited about 2 months ago · History
Bayliss apparently ahead of OPP...

Edit: scratch that. If it is to be read into like that, then Howieson would also be ahead of both Bayliss and OPP, which I doubt is the case
Permalink Permalink
about 2 months ago
hepatitis wrote:
"Bindon played 26 games for United in all competitions, but missed the club’s last two fixtures because of an ankle injury."

That's a real concern. Especially since I rate him to start ahead of Payne at RB.

Only 1st 0r 2nd pick backline person that hasnt been injured of late is Surman??
 
Bindon is fine – he has been seen training with Nottingham Forest since Sheffield Unied's season ended – as are Bell and Thomas, who both didn't feature for their clubs this weekend, but only as precautions due to tightness.
Permalink Permalink
Endorsed by
hepatitis
about 2 months ago
imanixsupporter wrote:
Bayliss apparently ahead of OPP...

Edit: scratch that. If it is to be read into like that, then Howieson would also be ahead of both Bayliss and OPP, which I doubt is the case

One is a 6 and one is an 8. So Bayliss would be ahead of OPP.

Three for me, and two for them.

Permalink Permalink
about 2 months ago
Their position on the board doesnt mean rank necessarily.

Permalink Permalink
Endorsed by
coochieeGooner 4 Life
about 2 months ago
MetalLegNZ wrote:
Their position on the board doesnt mean rank necessarily.

 

Looks very much like a probable starting lineup though.

Three for me, and two for them.

Permalink Permalink
about 2 months ago · edited about 2 months ago · History
Why bother with such a board. Surely Baze & Co can basically mentally arrange the 50 odd names on that board in some sort of selection order.

23 of 26 man WC squad pick themselves.

And Elliot Collier?  Is the guy still playing football?  At least Myer Bevan & Ryan Feutz are.

Dan Edwards will be happy!

Wasn't there a bit of a stink about 10 years ago when it was spied Huddo's NZF office world map had no player pins in Scandinavia. Chris James, Craig Henderson, Steven Old etc being there at the time from memory
Permalink Permalink
about 2 months ago
imanixsupporter wrote:
On Piney & Burgess' pod today they did the Tommy Smith chat again. Burgess is expecting he will get picked. Both seemed to be almost making the case for him being in the squad.

I can see the reasons why his presence would be beneficial but there is simply no argument for why he couldnt be equally as beneficial without being an official member of the 26. Piney and Burgess didn't address this angle and no journalist has put this to Bazeley either which is disappointing, I'd have liked to have heard Baze's response to having that put to him.

It is such nepotistic bullshit. I just feel so bad for whoever out of the likes of Bayliss, OPP, Tuiloma, McGarry, Roux, Rogerson, de Jong, LBS etc who misses out and will feel like they might have gone if it wasn't for Smith. 
100% agree. If Smith is wanted for the vibe then get him into the coaching staff somehow. Most people would support that. Every player should be there on playing merit. What happens if we have a bad run with CB injuries and another CB gets a red card in the first game and gets a ban.
Im a big fan of Smith as a person and leader but hes playing vitually 5th level pub football and even then not regularly.
This is the World Cup FFS
Permalink Permalink
Endorsed by
Gooner 4 Life
about 2 months ago
The only difference would be the $ he would get.

Auckland will rise once more

Permalink Permalink
about 2 months ago
Ben Gibson not on the chart?

Can only assume that he has not declared for NZ or else Baz is bloody hopeless?

Auckland will rise once more

Permalink Permalink
about 2 months ago
Has anyone seen Baz using the chart - no.
So how can people question what he is doing with it, without any knowledge to work from.

The article in STUFF was actually quite well reasoned today for the inclusion (even if you dont agree with it) - the different relationship he has with players as a player versus as a staff member. That been said, he's that low down the order, do players see him as a player still?
Permalink Permalink
about 2 months ago · edited about 2 months ago · History
https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/360963425/all-whites-centre-back-tommy-smith-earned-his-last-cap-2024-hes-still-expected-go-2026-fifa-world

I read Baze's comments about Smith being a cultural architect and a connector - which for a travelling squad is important. But he doesnt have to be selected as part of the playing squad to work his magic! Also, it's not like the bulk of the squad hasnt played together over the last year or more! They no doubt have all gone through good and bad times together, why does Smith get to go when his connection skills seem largely unnecessary?
I'm pretty sure that the playing squad wont care if Smith goes as a player or staff.

I guess we'll find out on Thursday if he is selected as a player and it wont be until we are deep into the pool play to see if we are suddenly short of CB's.

Queenslander 3x a year.

Permalink Permalink
Endorsed by
YoungHeartHM
about 2 months ago · edited about 2 months ago · History
MetalLegNZ wrote:
Has anyone seen Baz using the chart - no.
So how can people question what he is doing with it, without any knowledge to work from.

The article in STUFF was actually quite well reasoned today for the inclusion (even if you dont agree with it) - the different relationship he has with players as a player versus as a staff member. That been said, he's that low down the order, do players see him as a player still?
What do you think TVNZ brought it into his office for a prop or something?



Auckland will rise once more

Permalink Permalink
about 2 months ago
Personally I'd rather have Tuiloma as RB backup ahead of Elliot. I'm just not much of a fan of Callan E.
And given Payne's injury issues, I think extra RB cover is needed. I guess that will be Bindon.

https://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/360963425/all-whites-centre-back-tommy-smith-earned-his-last-cap-2024-hes-still-expected-go-2026-fifa-world

A common counter-argument is that Smith could still draw on his experience and provide leadership as a member of the coaching staff.

What that ignores is that there is a line you cross when you go from having a number on the back of your shirt to having a monogram on the front of your jacket.

Rory Fallon will tell you as much – as someone who finished his All Whites career playing a very similar role to the one Smith does now.
The 24-cap striker was at English seventh-tier club Dorchester Town when Anthony Hudson called him up for the first time in over a year for the World Cup qualifying playoff against Peru in 2017.

“I bring the fun,” was how he put it then – a much-needed counterpoint to Hudson’s all-business approach.

Two years later, he was back assisting Danny Hay and by his own admission, he “wasn’t ready for it,” so soon after being one of the boys: “A lot of those lads, when I was coaching, were still my mates, so it was very difficult”.

It is understood Bazeley believes it would be the same right now with Smith and that moving him from the playing group to the coaching staff would change things for the worse.

The debate as to whether someone more deserving has missed out at Smith’s expense can’t really be had until Thursday when the squad is confirmed, but it’s easy to see how the dominoes might fall.

Selections since the All Whites booked their World Cup spot point to 23 players who are locked in and whose absence would be an even greater shock than Smith's.

Give spot No 24 to him and spot No 25 to the third goalkeeper and that leaves spot No 26, likely to be used on a midfielder, either Lachlan Bayliss or Owen Parker-Price.

Whoever is chosen would be a break-glass-in-case-of-emergency option, unlikely to see much action, so there would be nothing lost including Smith ahead of whoever isn’t.

The same goes with considering an extra forward. There are 10 options to play on the left, the right or up top within the 23 probables. An 11th isn’t needed.

The question looks to be whether there is a more deserving defender – a fifth-choice centre back or a third-choice right back, notwithstanding the fact that first-choice right back Tim Payne would likely be the actual fifth choice in the middle if necessary.

The option who ticks both boxes is Bill Tuiloma.

His last 10 All Whites appearances have come at right back, but since joining the Wellington Phoenix in January, he has been playing centre back, the position where he made his previous 13 appearances – 12 of them under former coach Hay.

Of those who could miss out on World Cup selection at Smith’s expense, he is the only one who could feel hard done by. Leaving out an uncapped centre back such as Hughes or Stanger just wouldn’t be the same.

At the same time, Tuiloma’s mixed performances in his five All Whites outings in 2025 hardly made the case for a bigger role. His club career had also stalled before he came back home, to the point where he had played in just 12 of Charlotte FC’s last 87 Major League Soccer fixtures.

All signs point towards Bazeley being content with centre back Bindon as the emergency option behind Payne and Callan Elliot on the right.

If the All Whites find themselves in desperate need of a sixth-choice centre back or a third-choice right back next month, that is when selecting Smith could come back to bite them.

Most likely they will be just fine.
Permalink Permalink
about 2 months ago
My 26 man squad and a starting 11 for Game 1
 
- Bell/Stamenic & Thomas - why not?  Stamenic to play in a more forward role.
- Bindon and Surman to start
- Strong quality bench, albeit the majority are coming back from injury - so fresh legs coupled with reduced minutes
Permalink Permalink
about 2 months ago
So Smith is in I guess, based on all the articles about him potentially being in the squad. Likely some indication has been given that it is very much on the cards. I'm not going to complain about it anymore, it is what it is. If Chris Wood getting to bring a mate helps him finally score a meaningful goal for NZ for the first time ever it will be worth it. 

This for me leaves only one spot on the plane and I think it is going to Bayliss. OPP's team has only just got going and appear to have had a bit of a horror start to their league season and I think that will count against him. 

Poor old Tuiloma I think will be the man with the most reason to resent Tommy, but he does have himself to blame a bit. Happily sat on the bench at Charlotte on a high wage for years, only moved for game time a few months before the tournament and had a few howlers at the Nix this season. Stanger too, but I think Tuiloma's seniority, familiarity, positional flexibility and attacking weapons would have got him in. 

Crcombe Paulsen Woud;
Payne Elliot;
Boxall Surman Bindon Pijnaker Smith;
Cacace de Vries;
Bell Stamenic Thomas Rufer Bayliss;
Just McCowatt Old Singh Garbett Randall;
Wood Kosta Waine

Permalink Permalink
about 2 months ago
MetalLegNZ wrote:
Their position on the board doesnt mean rank necessarily.

 
The board probably means nothing and they use it just to name normal squads with magnets in no particular order, probably Bazeley messing with media.

Also most squads seem good, I also agree that Smith will take the Jordan Henderson role of old experienced head in the squad that won't play (it amuses me that people don't understand why Henderson gets selected and most WC squads have at least one person), also does help for Smith that him and Chris Wood are best mates. 

Tuiloma really did no favours of coming to the A-League imo and you could say the same about Singh.
Permalink Permalink
about 2 months ago
It’s interesting- apparently OPP has been one of the best performed players and a driving force behind promotion! 

But neither of them or Tuiloma for that matter, deserves to miss out to Smith. 

Tuiloma should be there to provide a different kind of RB cover too. Someone stronger in the air and more capable with a long ball. 

Smith…might, might be okay. But it feels like cash for the boys or that Baze is terrified of rebellion so needs to promote a head prefect…


Permalink Permalink
Endorsed by
Antzcoochiee
about 2 months ago · edited about 2 months ago · History
Yeah likewise my biggest concern with picking Smith over Tuiloma is it leaves the AWs a bit light on RB cover, especially given Payne's recent hammy issues. For a 20-30 min attacking RB cameo off the pine for a spent Payne when chasing a goal, I think BT is a better option than Elliot.

Tuiloma's defensive errors less exposed at RB than CB. When the AWs played in the US last June (Payne unavailable), Tuiloma was preferred to Elliot. Years of experience playing Stateside.


OPP and Bayliss are different sort of players. OPP is a mini Thomas, from the Ole school of a 100 touches per game. Box to box no 8s really. Bayliss is a more attacking midfielder. Had some nice mazy runs on debut against 10 man Chile, but was it him who failed to track back when they scored their goal?

Likely depends on where Baze sees the squad balance. It might be that it's a higher chance that OPP may actually get mins at the WC. I read Thomas had some hammy issues at Zwolle recently. If RT and one of Bell/Stamenic were injured, suddenly Parker-Price could be elevated to even start.

There seems a longer queue of AMs ahead of Bayliss before he would likely even be needed off the pine. All just guesswork.
Permalink Permalink
about 2 months ago · edited about 2 months ago · History
I mean Elliot does provide LB cover too, with de Vries and Cacace injury prone this year, but he’s had his own injury concerns too. 

The way the game is going tactically- crowd the box at the front post on corners, Tuiloma is valuable in commanding space in the air and the box, attacking or defending?

If Smith was serious about the World Cup he surely, surely could have got a better team than where he’s playing now? 

But now we’ve spent this angst, he’ll probably get a run on and make up for the De Rossi shirt tug with a brace to get us a win or a goal line clearance to maintain our qualification from group or some such!


Permalink Permalink
Endorsed by
Antz
about 2 months ago · edited about 2 months ago · History
I think Bill will be going but as a utility covering CB, RB and CDM, I also think there is a good chance OPP will get a ticket, a lot of us have wanted to see Bell, Thomas and Stamenic on the pitch together, if/when that happens it leaves only rufer really covering those three especially if Bill doesn’t go, you could argue that Singh can play in the center but he’s more of an attacker and there is also a high chance he will only last 5mins then be out of the WC, I think Nando will miss out, Baze has showen in the past his preferred CB pairing is Mike and Finn starting, leaving Tyler, Tom and Bill on the bench, I’d also personally take George over Nando. I don’t  think Baylis is really in the running this time round, happy to be proven wrong though.
Also anyone reading the post this morning OPP plays in the Swedish top flight not second division as written in the paper 
Permalink Permalink
about 2 months ago
I'm a little surprised no one is calling Kosta a question mark? 

He's been bang average this season and do we really need 3 strikers? When we only play with one, Garbett can cover this spot at a stretch too. 
Permalink Permalink
Endorsed by
niobYe