Post history

History for sawu

2017 National Youth League

Back to topic

Current version

Posted October 20, 2016 08:52 · last edited October 20, 2016 08:54

otagolad wrote:

Southern 1, Hamilton 3.

Southern looked pretty disorganised, didn't offer a whole lot.

Hamilton marginally better in all departments. Benefited from a debatable pen. Well worth the 3 points.

That's being very generous to Southern. Hamilton destroyed them in the first half. Southern didn't come close to having a shot on goal. Meanwhile Liam pulled off some stunning stops to save total embarrassment. 

The Wanderers midfield ran  rampant. Southern played 433 first half but the wingers were playing as genuine forwards, and with Rahan disappointing it left two midfielders unable to cope with Hamilton's big strong fellas. Their captain Hayes & teammate were running the show. 

That first half genuinely looked  like men vs boys. 

Second half more  even but clearly after the penalty (which did look debatable) they were clearly just cruising. 

Very worrying signs for Southern after the highs of last season. Looked like no tactical strategy, and fitness & strength looked a mile off. 

Previous versions

2 versions
sawu edited October 20, 2016 08:54
otagolad wrote:

Southern 1, Hamilton 3.

Southern looked pretty disorganised, didn't offer a whole lot.

Hamilton marginally better in all departments. Benefited from a debatable pen. Well worth the 3 points.

[/quote]

That's being very generous to Southern. Hamilton destroyed them in the first half. Southern didn't come close to having a shot on goal. Meanwhile Liam pulled off some stunning stops to save total embarrassment. 

The Wanderers midfield ran  rampant. Southern played 433 first half but the wingers were playing as genuine forwards, and with Rahan disappointing it left two midfielders unable to cope with Hamilton's big strong fellas. Their captain Hayes & teammate were running the show. 

That first half genuinely looked  like men vs boys. 

Second half more  even but clearly after the penalty (which did look debatable) they were clearly just cruising. 

Very worrying signs for Southern after the highs of last season. Looked like no tactical strategy, and fitness & strength looked a mile off. 

[quote=the gibb] Southern were woeful, esp the two that came off at half time & Peter Coates can go back to pig hunting for the rest of the summer. Hamilton should've had two pens in the first half, Ref was very poor

Peter only came on at HT didn't be? He was very much off the pace but someone said he had been very ill all week & clearly shouldn't have played at all. 

sawu edited October 20, 2016 08:53
otagolad wrote:

Southern 1, Hamilton 3.

Southern looked pretty disorganised, didn't offer a whole lot.

Hamilton marginally better in all departments. Benefited from a debatable pen. Well worth the 3 points.

[/quote]

That's being very generous to Southern. Hamilton destroyed them in the first half. Southern didn't come close to having a shot on goal. Meanwhile Liam pulled off some stunning stops to save total embarrassment. 

The Wanderers midfield ran  rampant. Southern played 433 first half but the wingers were playing as genuine forwards, and with Rahan disappointing it left two midfielders unable to cope with Hamilton's big strong fellas. Their captain Hayes & teammate were running the show. 

That first half genuinely looked  like men vs boys. 

Second half more  even but clearly after the penalty (which did look debatable) they were clearly just cruising. 

Very worrying signs for Southern after the highs of last season. Looked like no tactical strategy, and fitness & strength looked a mile off. 

[quote=the gibb] Southern were woeful, esp the two that came off at half time & Peter Coates can go back to pig hunting for the rest of the summer. Hamilton should've had two pens in the first half, Ref was very poor

Peter only came on at HT didn't be? He was very much off the pace but someone said he had been very ill all week & clearly shouldn't have played at all.