National League / OCL

ASB Premiership: Changes Needed Next Season

589 replies · 127,048 views
almost 13 years ago

tripvincent wrote:

2ndBest wrote:

 I really don't get the angst against it. This league is a franchise league. Would other people be worried is someone applied for a franchise, recruited players from the U20s, and got Chris Milicich to coach them, but call them something other that the U20. Pretty much the same thing.


It's really not. It's a weak argument and you're supporting NZF's sad excuse to not pay for international competition for our best young players. The best U20's will already be playing in the ASBP bar a few in 2013/14 and 2014/15 in the lead up to the World Cup here so I really don't see the point. Also how many times have we seen a NZ youth side picked for a tourny in Oceania only for it to change radically by the actual Fifa tourney? And what happens if say 7-8 of the best U20's decide to play elsewhere (here or overseas) do they miss out? Or does Milicich bring them in and cut a whole bunch of guys he's been prepping for two years or does he simply ignore that talent at the behest of NZF. It's going to cause a lot of problems...

If Manawatu needed to be cut then fine but bring in an actual 'franchise' and not the NZU20 although I really feel for YM and I bet all those years feel wasted now. 


You're putting words in my worth. I've said plenty of times that there need to be proper preparation before tournaments. The two aren't mutually exclusive. ASBP can (and in my opinion should) be in addition to a proper U20s programme.
Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

2ndBest wrote:

tripvincent wrote:

2ndBest wrote:

 I really don't get the angst against it. This league is a franchise league. Would other people be worried is someone applied for a franchise, recruited players from the U20s, and got Chris Milicich to coach them, but call them something other that the U20. Pretty much the same thing.


It's really not. It's a weak argument and you're supporting NZF's sad excuse to not pay for international competition for our best young players. The best U20's will already be playing in the ASBP bar a few in 2013/14 and 2014/15 in the lead up to the World Cup here so I really don't see the point. Also how many times have we seen a NZ youth side picked for a tourny in Oceania only for it to change radically by the actual Fifa tourney? And what happens if say 7-8 of the best U20's decide to play elsewhere (here or overseas) do they miss out? Or does Milicich bring them in and cut a whole bunch of guys he's been prepping for two years or does he simply ignore that talent at the behest of NZF. It's going to cause a lot of problems...

If Manawatu needed to be cut then fine but bring in an actual 'franchise' and not the NZU20 although I really feel for YM and I bet all those years feel wasted now. 


You're putting words in my worth. I've said plenty of times that there need to be proper preparation before tournaments. The two aren't mutually exclusive. ASBP can (and in my opinion should) be in addition to a proper U20s programme.


I haven't put any words in your mouth! But don't kid yourself! It's not an addition. McKavanagh has already said it's a cost effective move. NZF are not going to do this and overseas matches.

NZF really has no idea and I find this particularly troubling...

McKavanagh acknowledged there could be some issues with centralising the under-20s. Clubs will resist releasing their best young talent while some players will be keen to jump ship out of fear their World Cup selection prospects will be jeopardised if they stay put.


Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

 By telling me I'm supporting something that I've never said I've supported, you're are putting word in that.

For me, the ASBP should be a development league. Inclusion of the U20 does more to achieve that than Manuwatu.

I'm not sure it matters too much if the whole team doesn't get together. Give a chance for a number of players to test/prove themselves by getting in front of the coaching staff more often.

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

2ndBest wrote:

 By telling me I'm supporting something that I've never said I've supported, you're are putting word in that.

For me, the ASBP should be a development league. Inclusion of the U20 does more to achieve that than Manuwatu.

I'm not sure it matters too much if the whole team doesn't get together. Give a chance for a number of players to test/prove themselves by getting in front of the coaching staff more often.


That really isnt putting words in your mouth. I think you're confused. 


Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

 What is it then? Telling me what I believe?

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

So you're not supporting NZF's decision to cut YM?


Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

No. This bit. ie. the bit I bolded in the first place.

tripvincent wrote:
... and you're supporting NZF's sad excuse to not pay for international competition for our best young players.
Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

2ndBest wrote:

 By telling me I'm supporting something that I've never said I've supported, you're are putting word in that.

For me, the ASBP should be a development league. Inclusion of the U20 does more to achieve that than Manuwatu.

I'm not sure it matters too much if the whole team doesn't get together. Give a chance for a number of players to test/prove themselves by getting in front of the coaching staff more often.


And yet this?

Im confused. If you're not supporting their decision, yet you're saying this???

Anyway ha lets leave it. Bored now


Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

Not sure how you are still unclear but this is what I think

1) ASBP should be a development league to support you talent coming through before they head off to better things (College, Phoenix, pro-contacts, other academies).

2) Manuwatu have been gash, and haven't really contributed to that.

3) U20s, whether it be the full team, or part of the team, will do more to develop talent.

4) Inclusion of the U20s shouldn't be a substitute for other pre-competition camps, tours and preparation. It should be in addition to.

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

1) agree

2) is there a proper examination why? And why undo any and all development thus far

3) these guys will be playing at clubs anyway

4) you wont see an int. programme


Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

 2) I can't think of many decent young palmy players. Think there might be one or two in the current U20s but not sure if they playing at senior level this year. From memory, Manuwatu have tended to sign the scraps from wellington and players from Rapa.

3) Some of them might. Pretty sure most of the current U20s from Waitak and ACFC don't play much at the senior level. And we are looking mainly at the younger age group. ie. U20 for the 2015 World Cup. So think there will be very few who are actually pulled away from their clubs.

4) Like I say. We need to. Although this decision won't impact the current rotation. And the next U15 WC will be in NZ so perhaps countries will come to us.

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

I can see the danger of players in this u20 side not being in the final squad. It does not mean the development is wasted though, it just means that it's not going to have the effect for intended purpose of the team.

This team will still cost because NZF are going to have to pay for the travel etc and 7 away games etc, won't be cheap.

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

2ndBest wrote:

Not sure how you are still unclear but this is what I think

1) ASBP should be a development league to support you talent coming through before they head off to better things (College, Phoenix, pro-contacts, other academies).

2) Manuwatu have been gash, and haven't really contributed to that.

3) U20s, whether it be the full team, or part of the team, will do more to develop talent.

4) Inclusion of the U20s shouldn't be a substitute for other pre-competition camps, tours and preparation. It should be in addition to.

The ASBP - our national league - is more than just a "development league" 2nd Best. It is the premier football competition in NZ and should be funded, marketed and maintained as such. It is not there to simply serve as a training ground for AW players, but as a reputable competition in its own right. It'll develop young NZ talent of its own accord. It's also our pathway to the O League.

The inclusion of the Under 20 side means NZF doesn't share my sentiments.

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

 Yeah well I think we disagree on that front.

We've got an interview with Grant this week on podcast. Should answer most people's questions.

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago · edited almost 13 years ago · History

2ndBest wrote:

 Yeah well I think we disagree on that front.

We've got an interview with Grant this week on podcast. Should answer most people's questions.

Doubt it. Guarantee he'll want a pre interview list of questions before hand so the NZF spin people can smudge the answers.
....and 2ndBest if you or any other flag bearer for 'everything NZF does is good for football' camp are involved question wise it'll be a waste of time. I'm sorry but Grant K is cut from the same cloth as Seatter. Just wish Harry N and Noah H would get more involved as I worry about those in control at present.
 

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

 It's already been recorded so you're wrong of the first part.

As for the second part, I haven't always agreed with what NZF does.

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

2ndBest wrote:

 It's already been recorded so you're wrong of the first part.

As for the second part, I haven't always agreed with what NZF does.

Cheers for responding so quickly 2ndBest. Can you please let us know when the interview will be posted and for the record did Grant want the list of questions before hand?
Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

 Prob wedness night.

No he didn't.

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

Looking forward to it 2ndBest. 


Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago · edited almost 13 years ago · History

2ndBest wrote:

 I really don't get the angst against it. This league is a franchise league. Would other people be worried is someone applied for a franchise, recruited players from the U20s, and got Chris Milicich to coach them, but call them something other that the U20. Pretty much the same thing.

I do notice how the most vocal and majority of people who are contributing to the angst are Auckland City fans, who are trying to convince themselves that the league they regularly finish second in is some highly-regarded, world-renowned league where all the teams involved legitimately have hopes of winning the title. I'm sure Waitakere fans would feel the same way, you know, if they actually have any (I'm not yet certain). I dunno, maybe years of being a Waikato fan have caused me to be negative but I agree with 2nd best.

Also, does anyone really think that the O-League money/qualification has any real chance of going to the Under 20's? The Phoenix A kids got killed by even the worst sides in the league, I realise the circumstances are different but I'll have a hard time being convinced that the NZ U-20's will be any more than fourth/fifth place at best.

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

this small forum discussion is definitely not a good indicator of each club's supporters view

treat it for what it is; a bunch of keeno's having a view

360footballnews.com

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

This week on In The Zone - Grant McCav on the ASBP, U20s and how that will work.

Incredible stamina. No shame. Yellow Fever.

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago · edited almost 13 years ago · History

N-Bomb wrote:

2ndBest wrote:

 I really don't get the angst against it. This league is a franchise league. Would other people be worried is someone applied for a franchise, recruited players from the U20s, and got Chris Milicich to coach them, but call them something other that the U20. Pretty much the same thing.

I do notice how the most vocal and majority of people who are contributing to the angst are Auckland City fans, who are trying to convince themselves that the league they regularly finish second in is some highly-regarded, world-renowned league where all the teams involved legitimately have hopes of winning the title. I'm sure Waitakere fans would feel the same way, you know, if they actually have any (I'm not yet certain). I dunno, maybe years of being a Waikato fan have caused me to be negative but I agree with 2nd best.

Also, does anyone really think that the O-League money/qualification has any real chance of going to the Under 20's? The Phoenix A kids got killed by even the worst sides in the league, I realise the circumstances are different but I'll have a hard time being convinced that the NZ U-20's will be any more than fourth/fifth place at best.

Think you answered your own question as to why you're "negative". I actually enjoy and want to promote the ASBP. One season Canterbury came within a penalty shootout of winning the title so it's not always a two horse race.

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

Unless you win, the other places don't count.

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

Jeff Vader wrote:

Unless you win, the other places don't count.

Yes they do - both Canterbury and Wellington have reached the ASBP finals. Which means they ousted either ACFC or Waitakere to get there so, as I was saying, it's not just a two-horse race.

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

I remember the glory days of YoungHeart Manawatu: 2nd in the minor premiership two years running and spurred on by some nippy livewire called Benjamin Totori...

People like Coldplay and voted for the Nazis. You can't trust people.

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

Ok I understand that, but what does it get you? It gets you exactly the same as those in last place - zero.

1st place is the only one that matters. Making the final doesn't get you into O League so for TW and Canty who made it there, they got....... zero.

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago · edited almost 13 years ago · History

 Well $30,000 actually...



Does YHM still get their share , this or next year ?

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

I remember the glory days of YoungHeart Manawatu: 2nd in the minor premiership two years running and spurred on by some nippy livewire called Benjamin Totori...



Whatever happened to him ?
Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

FU BLU wrote:

I remember the glory days of YoungHeart Manawatu: 2nd in the minor premiership two years running and spurred on by some nippy livewire called Benjamin Totori...



Whatever happened to him ?
I think he plays for Barcelona these days

People like Coldplay and voted for the Nazis. You can't trust people.

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

I may have said this already, but this week on In The Zone we've interviewed Grant McCav and I've done my best to ask him all of James Dean's questions. He gave some interesting answers.

Incredible stamina. No shame. Yellow Fever.

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

FU BLU wrote:

Well $30,000 actually...

Does YHM still get their share , this or next year ?

Sorry is there prize money for winning the ASB and making the final? I was not aware of that. I thought it was generally accepted that there was no cash prize at all.

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

Jeff Vader wrote:

FU BLU wrote:

Well $30,000 actually...

Does YHM still get their share , this or next year ?

Sorry is there prize money for winning the ASB and making the final? I was not aware of that. I thought it was generally accepted that there was no cash prize at all.
 

Its the Franchises share of OFC money I believe. U-20 will get it you would think.

  Supporter For Ever - Keep The Faith - Foundation Member - Never Lets FAX Get In The Way Of A Good Yarn

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

Ok so again finishing last or 2nd.... same thing.

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

Jeff Vader wrote:

Ok so again finishing last or 2nd.... same thing.




Its participating ...thats the thing !!
Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

Jeff Vader wrote:

Ok so again finishing last or 2nd.... same thing.


So the 8th placed team gets an O-League spot do they?
Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

R&C wrote:

Jeff Vader wrote:

Ok so again finishing last or 2nd.... same thing.


So the 8th placed team gets an O-League spot do they?
No, but do OK cash wise provided a New Zealand team wins the O-League final.
Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

 Finishing second does not guarantee you an O League spot. Did TW and Canty go in the year they made the final? Nope......

Grumpy old bastard alert

Permalink Permalink
almost 13 years ago

Jeff Vader wrote:

 Finishing second does not guarantee you an O League spot. Did TW and Canty go in the year they made the final? Nope......

True but gives you more chance than finishing 8th
Permalink Permalink