After Waitakere United's awful showing at the CWC and in light of
the success of the Phoenix, I thnk it is time that the NZFC is
looked at to see how
1. The standard of the game is raised.
2. The game is structured to appeal to the public - to bring
in both new playing blood, and also new football fans.
It is evident that many of the Yellow Fever fans are under 30
- probably under-23. The great mass of the playing public is
younger even than that. It is a generation keen and ready to
embrace the game.
But the game is run by people in their 40s and 50s (of which I
am one) who are running the game as if it is still the old football
club scene (the old grassroots as the egg chasers call it).
People do not want to go and watch club football, but there
is a demand to see good quality "professional" football.
There has to be a clear separation of the two - which does not
happen in New Zealand. The NZFC clubs are by and large made up of
well meaning amateurs. And they are not taking into account both
the playing and spectating needs of the public.
Young players need a clear pathway to a professional or
semipro career,and it is in the interests of the NZFC clubs to
nuture and develop those players.
There is the chance to play professionally in New Zealand now,
through the Phoenix. They are a professional club,
deliberately separated from the politics of grassroots football.
They are in a league which is growing, and which is in the next few
years going to finally take the game to heights unheard of in
football in this part of the world - the Beckham game shows that
the Phoenix are a wonderful vehicle for bring top class football to
this country - and next year tey will play against the likes of
Celtic or Barcelona (the A-League have said they are going to bring
top clubs down for their preseason). They are also going to tap
into the growing stature of the game in the US and Asia - which is
all good news for the sport.
But the NZFC have to now get their game in order to bring our
players up to the next level - a level that was exposed by
Waitakere on Friday night.
Simply put, Waitakere was chock full of players who even Blind
Freddy could see were never going to compete at that level. There
were few if any promising youngsters coming through, the team
(Benjamin Totori and Jason Haine, apart) were all park footballers,
or English lower league hasbeens. It is no wonder they failed, and
it is no wonder that crowds are not going to turn up to the NZFC to
watch the standard, long ball rubbish, we put up with week in and
week out.
What I believe the NZFC should be doing is to have a two tier
league. A semipro franchise first team league, and then below them
a development league. They already run two teams so there would be
little extra cost.
But taking a leaf from Major League Baseball which does not
have a reserve grade. the development league teams would be based
in a regional town, in that francise's Federation, mirroring the
minor league system which works so well in baseball.
For example Hawkes Bay's development side could play out of
Gisborne, Wellington's could play out of New Plymouth, Canterbury's
out of Nelson, Dunedin's out of Invercargill, Hamilton's out of
Tauranga, or Rotorua, Palmerston North's out of Taupo or Wanganui.
In Auckland, Waitakere's development team could play out of North
Shore, and Auckland City out of Bill McKinley.
Now each of these Development league sides would be run by a
sub franchise, which undertake all the day to day running and
financing of the club. But the players all come from a pool, owned
by the senior franchise.
And this is where the standard of the game can be raised, for
the development teams need to be run along the Olympic model. Three
senior players on the park at any one time, the rest to be made of
under-23 players.
So basically what you are doing is playing a franchise first
team in the main centre, and then you are playing the
reserve/under-23 team in another centre. Which is how the major
league/minor league system works.
With the development league being restricted age-wise it will
encourage the identification of new talent and clear out the
deadwood players.
One thing I noticed with both the under-17 and under-20 New
Zealand teams, were the better ball skills of the players, compared
to the previous generation of long-ball plodders, the Jeremy
Christie, Jonathan Perry types. This generation of youngsters will
get a decent league to play in, where they are kept away from the
grassroot clubs - where too often players drop to the level of the
competition - Mark Burton and Aran Lines are two players
I remember doing the same at the Kingz - arriving with tons of
flair and technique and then dropping quickly to the old NSL
standard from where they never recovered. The youngsters will also
keep on a "path" to a professional career.
As for the senior franchise teams. They have to be run on a
more professional basis, less like park football clubs. New coaches
are imperative. And they should take a leaf out of the Phoenix in
terms of marketing.
There is a potentially huge market out there from new
immigrants who come from football playing countries. And rugby is
in a state of disarray. Their game is being shown up to what it is,
flawed.
The opportunities are huge. We just need some new ideas to
take advantage of them.
We can't let this be another 1982.
Permalink
Permalink
Good article Daikiwi its just missing the "How do we pay for this?"
part! If you could put some thought into the financial model it
would be good. Remember we would have no Phoenix had it not been
for Terry S.
Perhaps a few more private backers could be found? Perhaps a public listing?
But I know how hard it is to fund an NZFC franchise and to get the product right you need the financial resources.
Good thinking though...
Perhaps a few more private backers could be found? Perhaps a public listing?
But I know how hard it is to fund an NZFC franchise and to get the product right you need the financial resources.
Good thinking though...
Permalink
Permalink