National League / OCL

NZFC a loss making exercise

34 replies · 4,277 views
almost 19 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
NZFC a loss making exercise
Permalink Permalink
almost 19 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I see NZ Football has announced its annual figures and there is a $214,000 debt attributed to the first two seasons of the NZFC. That is disheartening when you think that each season the franchise clubs pay NZF $405,000 incl GST in entry fees alone. It would be nice to know how the debt accrued to this level. Most franchises are probably running at a loss anyway, but I am just wondering whether it would be worthwhile for the franchises to actually take over control of the NZFC and run it themselves.
It appears that everytime NZF tinker with the highest level of national football there are problems. The North Island and South Island leagues were short lived, the summer league went the same way. The NZ Community Trust sponsorship monies was around 1.5 million dollars and I guess this was gobbled up pretty quickly. Now that sponsorship has ended and with around 5 months until season 4 kicks off we are looking for a new sponsor. We are always reinventing the circle.
I'm sure that there are some clever people within the franchises that have the nous to do a better job and maybe its time that control of the NZFC was handed to the clubs.
I think a lot of money was paid to SKY TV to broadcast the highlights show and that is one of the problems. Any good businessman would suggest that the TV rights would be worth money to the game, not the otherway around. I mean there are a lot of people here that subscribe to SKY for the football alone. Surely they have some consumer power. What would SKY do if every person that subbed to SKY handed back there subscription because there was no local football on TV.
OK, many will argue that the local game doesn't come up to spec but its all we have and we've got to try and develop it the best we can, with the resources we have.
So do you reckon NZF can guide the NZFC into a quality competition? Or do you think the franchises would be able to do a better job. Discuss.
Permalink Permalink
almost 19 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I think NZF can build the competition into a self-supporting, viable comp but some things worry me.
With the carrot of OCL dangling I think the issue is whether there will be enough of a spread of the cash. I can see a couple of superclubs (by NZ standards, probably both auckland based the way things are going) and the rest being also-rans, sort of a smaller version of the Scottish Premier League but without the bigotry or the porridge.
I think there needs to be a more even spread of the OCL/World Club Championship cash that comes in, and this money should fund the promtion of and playing of the league, at least until it can sustain itself. If it doesn't look self-funding in, say, five years, can it.
I'd also like to see it expanded to include a Fijian club and maybe a Tahitian club. we've got to build up the region, not just NZ.
Nix, Leyton Orient and Alloa Athletic supporting schmuck.

Permalink Permalink
almost 19 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I know my ideas are full of holes, I'm really just think aloud on this.
Nix, Leyton Orient and Alloa Athletic supporting schmuck.

Permalink Permalink
almost 19 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Some good thoughts there The Jam.  Isn't the OCL money already distributed pretty evenly?  Problem with including Fijian/Tahitian teams is of course hte increased cost and the OCL does achieve that to some extent.  Think at the moment it has a good grounding and really don't want to see another change in the format, we have this now and I think that we have to run with it.  It all comes down to getting better players on the park and establishing some traditions around the clubs so that people aren't going to watch "a" team, they are going to watch "their" team.

Normo's coming home

Permalink Permalink
almost 19 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
was there a fee for the phoenix to take up the licence ? 
Permalink Permalink
almost 19 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

The money from making the World Club Champs at this stage is $670,000 which will head into Waitakere United's bank account once they get back from their match against the Japanese side. Should they progress further in the comp there will be more money.

But what happens next is that Waitakere will split the money so that NZF gets a chunk, the 7 other franchises check a piece and the balance is Waitaks. Last year the franchises picked up around $58,000 each from Auckland City's WCC appearance. Waitakere will also deduct any expenses incurred in getting to Japan.
 
I believe Auckland City may have picked up around a million so it could be that this time the payouts will be less. NZF will take a good slice of the $$.
 
Re the Phoenix paying a fee....I'd say that is where Terry's first million has gone. Someone more in the know may be able to extrapolate on this....
 
 
Permalink Permalink
almost 19 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I think a significant amount of the loss is incurred by having to fly to and from games. The NZFC should get sponsored by Air New Zealand so, not only will they have a sponsor, they will also get discounted flights and, over time, they will be able to accumulate significant portions of money quicker.
Permalink Permalink
almost 19 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
And you don't think NZ Football have gone down that track? They've approached Air New Zealand numorous times over the years. They get the best deal they canl on the team travel, but it is still a significant expense as you point out. However Air New Zealand don't get a return as the game isn't screened live on TV here. That is why they sponsor rugby. There has to be a return in order for a sponsor to come on board.
Major sponsorship is keyed in with television and until we get our NZFC product on regular TV it will be difficult to get new sponsors. Retaining current sponsors is proving just as difficult. And did you know we actually have to pay SKY to get it the NZFC on TV.In the first season of the NZFC Waikato FC had to pay $12,000 just to get the home games filmed and I know Manawatu was paying up over $15,000 to get their games done. It's not just a matter of going along to a sponsor and getting them to sign up. Far from it.
A lot of you really have no idea of the unseen costs that crop up. For example, Hawkes Bay United on one ocassion had a charter flight from Napier to Hamilton. Their plane broke down and a replacement had to be sent from Auckland to Napier. The delay cost Waikato FC because they had to pay Waikato Stadium staff for the extra hours that they had to work due to the flight delay. The game was broadcast live on Newstalk ZB and their man had to rip back to the station to reprogramme a few things til the revised kickoff was announced.
That happened a couple of times to Waikato and I bet the teams that were late didn't front up with the $$. Admittedly it may have not been the oppositions fault, but really they should have flown out at 10am rather than 1pm or so close to the scheduled kickoff time. There is quite a lot of bad organisation that needs sorting. 
Permalink Permalink
almost 19 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Fair points Kiwi Canary, I didn't know about all those things. Anybody know Sky TV's email address? I say we write to them and get it signed (or as close to signed as is possible over the internet) by all of the yellow fever members.
Permalink Permalink
almost 19 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Sky is only worried about one thing. Money.


Write to TVNZ, if the government is happy to cough up millions for yachting (Which few kiwis can afford) and the rugby, then they shouldn't mind sliding NZF a few dollars to help make the national comp sustainable and possibly profitable.

i would be extremely happy to be able to sit down every sunday for a weekly match on TV1, atleast then i would know my taxes are going somewhere other than Cullens pockets


Permalink Permalink
almost 19 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Sky gave up Formula one in New Zealand but the number of set top boxes returned did made not make a differrence, it was the ad sponsors around the broadcast that made the difference.
With NZFC struggling for such a supporter will it ever be viable for SKY.  Motorcycling NZ found enough support(ads in and around the shows) to tempt TVNZ to broadcast programs but I also think the recording company was a fan. they also copyrighted all footage so others had to pay to use it. Football New Zealand must retain ownership of all footage.
Permalink Permalink
almost 19 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
FNZ would hold overall ownership of any football from the NZFC, but I'd say that CTV would hold that for say the Canterbury United DRAGONS. But it still goes back to the simple fact that there is not enough money in the local game. The All Whites have a poor record of late and so attracting advertisers isn't that easy. If they were winning, then the problem wouldnt be so bad..but as you all know a win in international football (outside of OFC) is a rare thing for us.
With the U17's U20's and wimins teams all qualifying for the various World Cup tournaments, NZF will be mortgaged up to the hilt with arranging pre-tournament friendlies because they don't usually get the money from qualifying until a month or two after the actual event. So international football will take priority to the NZFC.
Permalink Permalink
almost 19 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Is it a possibility that this new Freeview system might be an option for showing local football? Don`t know much about it myself.
Permalink Permalink
almost 19 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
The government has never helped sport in NZ. Smokefree transitional sponsorship was nothing compared with the Winfield contribution to Football. Now the pokie money has been tampered with and again sport takes the fall. Yes there were people taking personal benefits from this money but probably not the amount no longer available to sport in NZ now. 
Permalink Permalink
almost 19 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I think that post misses the mark. The government assist sport through SPARC who have a criteria of only recognising elite sports or athletes. Football does not fit into this category although we have received some funding since the womens teams have started doing well. This is one reason for staying in the Oceania region. So long as our U17 & U20 teams keep qualifying for World finals we will keep receiving this funding.

What's sight without sound? Love without peace? Copulation without conception?

Permalink Permalink
almost 19 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I think our Oyimpic games team has not Sparc funding.
 
But my main comment was that the general football family which is where our elite players come from is on reducing spiral of funding and the goverment changes do not help this.
Permalink Permalink
almost 19 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Spot on there. Why they don't fund sport on a per capita basis is inexplicable. perhaps they need to incorporate an element of number of participants in to say 50% of their funding. It would be interesting to see the $'s per participant spent on a sport like rowing compared to football.

What's sight without sound? Love without peace? Copulation without conception?

Permalink Permalink
almost 19 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I think that post misses the mark. The government assist sport through SPARC who have a criteria of only recognising elite sports or athletes. Football does not fit into this category although we have received some funding since the womens teams have started doing well. This is one reason for staying in the Oceania region. So long as our U17 & U20 teams keep qualifying for World finals we will keep receiving this funding.
 
I guess that means movuing away from Oceania would mean less funding then...assuming we don't make the WC's??
Permalink Permalink
almost 19 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
or the Olympics.

What's sight without sound? Love without peace? Copulation without conception?

Permalink Permalink
almost 19 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Isn't the Olympics U20   i.e. easier to qualify for?
Permalink Permalink
almost 19 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Definitely easier than the world cup, particularly now Aussie are in Asia because there is a definite spot for Oceania.

What's sight without sound? Love without peace? Copulation without conception?

Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Hard News wrote:
Isn't the Olympics U20   i.e. easier to qualify for?


U23...
 
Oh yeah...thanks.
Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Getting back to Kiwi Canary's original point I think it is important that the NZFC keeps running in its current format. The standard of our younger players is gradually improving, this coupled with some quality imports will see an increase in attendance at games. I feel the summer based competition is a great idea for the likes of me who still plays on a Saturday in winter and would struggle to get to see many games live.

What's sight without sound? Love without peace? Copulation without conception?

Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I just worry where Graham Seatter is going regarding the NZFC. He was quoted as saying he would be reluctant to see a "second rate" side going to Japan again....referring to Auckland City.
Now to me that is 1] disprespectful of Auckland City and 2] showing little faith in our own NZFC competition. Regardless of what format the NZFC is run, be that franchise or going back to club-based, we have to make this competition work. I still think it is best played in summer and as my friend above says, the standard is getting better. In the 80's the national league standard was very good, but most teams were stacked with foreigners and we saw few kiwi players getting the opportunity. These days we've done a total reversal and we see kiwi talent being given a go. The imports are still there but check where they come from...Solomon Islands, Fiji and a few from the UK and other parts. We need to get our best young players in the NZFC otherwise we are kidding ourselves that we will get any better at a national level.
 
Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
i think Graham Seatter is being fair in wanting the best going to Japan, cos, lets face it, if 'we' (Oceania) dont start to be competitive/professional then they'll A) pull us out or B) make it even harder to get in.


remember, if we dont make it then the $$$ doesnt come in.


we need more money in the sport, God bless TS for showing the way...hopefully other well off people can follow his example and invest a bit of coin in the NZFC (250k would pay 6 players just under 42k a year on full time pro contracts, this could lead to transfer fees etc)


do the NZFC franchises have full time players? by that i mean football is all they do and they are paid by the 'club' (eg: I know Fisher takes off to Sweden to line the bank before coming back to Can U)
gings2007-06-23 21:54:50


Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Another good point Kiwi Canary. Seatter needs to think more carefully before he says things like that, although I doubt he meant to slate Auckland City. It is typical of administrators in the game who make silly statements without regard to the wider ramifications. This is one reason why I believe Ricki Herbert will do well with the Phoenix, apart from his ability as a coach. He is no mug in this area. What about a play off between the NZ based A league team and the OCL winners to determine our representative in the world club championship? This gives the island nations incentive to improve as well.

What's sight without sound? Love without peace? Copulation without conception?

Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I'm dead against the Phoenix taking the NZ spot primarily because they don't play in an Oceania Football Confederation competition. They are playing in an Asian Football Confederation competition, the A-League which is run by FFA. The only connection is they have with NZ is thatthey are based in Wellington. And even if they were given the opportunity whose to say they would do any better than Auckland City or Waitakere United? They are a professional team and yet they can't beat an amateur U20 side...c'mon now;-p
I think you will find that the OFC won't have a bar of it anyway. I don't know where Seatter is heading with his comments but someone needs to give the geezer some valium, calm him down and get him focussed on his proper job.
Gings, there is no way NZFC sides can start paying players the kind of coin you are mentioning. Firstly they would have to stop taking money from the charitable trusts because they don't support professional sports teams and secondly there ain't the crowds to make it sustainable.
All franchises would go broke in one season. There are players no doubt picking up 30K such as Menapi at Waitakere, but he will have a sponsor stumping up the reddies and that is the backdoor way we operate if we want to have the best players playing at our particular NZFC side.
Michael Utting for example signed for Waikato and to help negotiate the deal I bought him a second hand  Ford Falcon and someone else threw him some bucks. There are a number of variations of these under the table deals and this sort of thing goes on all the time.
The general rule of thumb is if an NZFC side is struggling, then I would say they aren't paying the money to get the best players in...
Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Yes the Phoenix should not be in the OFC championship. I think they play A league with a dispensation only. And to take away the OFC championship from NZFC will down grade the compition for Franchises to an Elite NZ championship. (National League style)  
Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Kiwi Canary, i think you misunderstood my concept, it wasnt that they pay as it is set up presently, but rather some investors/sponsors etc do that and a pro contract is held with the club/franchise (what ever you want to call it). ok i'll admit my numbers probably are a bit unrealsitic at present.


the only way we are going to see the NZFC evolve into something sustainable that benifits football in NZ is if some professionalism (and money) comes in.


i am honestly suprised there is not a company that wishes to be the title sponsor of the nations premier football competition...i hate to say it but the future of this competition isnt looking flash without one of these coz without the league doesnt get promoted, and with out promotion theres no crowds etc etc


Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Look I've been involved administratively with three national league entities. Waikato United. Melville United and I founded Waikato FC and I can tell you that there are no companies out there willing to put in the money to sponsor the NZFC. I've been round long enough, tried all avenues, but the simple fact is that it's a hard struggle to get sponsorship for a franchise, let alone the entire league. Your concept has merit, and I don't want to put a downer on it, but even New Zealand Football can't find a sponsor of the league outside of a charitable trust. The entry fee has been raised from 45,000 plus GST to $65,000 plus GST per franchise from this season, so that is over half a million dollars for the 8 sides to raise, on top of running costs and player "payments" etc.
NZF resources are fair too thin and I would go along with the Otago United chairmans call for the NZFC to be administered independantly of NZF - but allowing them to be involved in some form - much like how the Premier League is run by a board of control under the auspices of the FA.
Sponsors will only come if TV is involved and right now, football would have to pay SKY TV to broadcast the games and the cost is prohibitive. So no TV, no sponsor, it is that simple.
 
Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I just worry where Graham Seatter is going regarding the NZFC. He was quoted as saying he would be reluctant to see a "second rate" side going to Japan again....referring to Auckland City.
Now to me that is 1] disprespectful of Auckland City and 2] showing little faith in our own NZFC competition.
 
I think Seatter is commenting on ACFC on a global scale, in which they clearly are "second rate". His comments could have ben a bit more diplomatic, granted, but he was justified in what he was saying. Whether what he suggests about Phoenix taking their place or not is justified is a different matter.
As for ACFC they are NZ's best and best-run club, but put alongside the clubs they met in the World Club Champs they appear to be out of their depth.
Now what would really work is for Phoenix to take over Wellington's NZFC franchise, or to grab another licence if any are ever made available, and to use the comp as a league for their reserves
TheJam2007-06-25 08:23:26
Nix, Leyton Orient and Alloa Athletic supporting schmuck.

Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Sponsors will only come if TV is involved and right now, football would have to pay SKY TV to broadcast the games and the cost is prohibitive. So no TV, no sponsor, it is that simple.
 
 
One way to help make this happen is to get better turnout at the games. YF website is as good a venue as any to encourage turnout to the NZFC games.The franchises really don't have the cash to spend up large on match venue/ time promotions. Those that are passionate about NZFC (kiwi-Canary et.al) should be commended on their efforts in keeping the profile of the NZFC high.  
 
 I reckon that if we could double turnouts (maybe a tough ask) to around 1500-2000 per game, then TV coverage might just  become a dsitinct possibility. I know thia has been said before, but when we consider how many families are connected to football now, it is surprising that the turnout to the NZFC games is still not brilliant. Are the clubs making announcements to all junoirs about their local franchise upcomgin match? Are those who are making trips in to games advertising any free seats in their cars at the club?  Perhpas junior coaches could shedule in an NZFC game once in a while as training for the week?
 
 
Permalink Permalink
over 18 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
phil_style wrote:
I reckon that if we could double turnouts (maybe a tough ask) to around 1500-2000 per game, then TV coverage might just  become a dsitinct possibility. I know thia has been said before, but when we consider how many families are connected to football now, it is surprising that the turnout to the NZFC games is still not brilliant. Are the clubs making announcements to all junoirs about their local franchise upcomgin match? Are those who are making trips in to games advertising any free seats in their cars at the club?  Perhpas junior coaches could shedule in an NZFC game once in a while as training for the week?
 
 

brilliant logic there. but, for me one of the reasons rugby is popular when it comes to going to see the game is because the bulk of the fans who attend the stadiums are players/coaches in the junior competitions, thus, the big games eg: NPC are mostly played in the evenings.


if the games were played later (i know, easier said than done) maybe crowds would be better.

maybe its time we all go bitch to the government to help[ fund the NZFC, they gave the rich boatees money, how about a 'common folk sport'?. it may do us some good now that HC is the ambassidor person for the WWC thats on the way.


Kiwi Canary: what sort of coin is the average NZFC player earning per week/game from the club/franchise?
gings2007-06-25 22:40:08


Permalink Permalink