I see NZ Football has announced its annual figures and there is a
$214,000 debt attributed to the first two seasons of the NZFC. That
is disheartening when you think that each season the franchise
clubs pay NZF $405,000 incl GST in entry fees alone. It would be
nice to know how the debt accrued to this level. Most franchises
are probably running at a loss anyway, but I am just wondering
whether it would be worthwhile for the franchises to actually take
over control of the NZFC and run it themselves.
It appears that everytime NZF tinker with the highest level of
national football there are problems. The North Island and South
Island leagues were short lived, the summer league went the same
way. The NZ Community Trust sponsorship monies was around 1.5
million dollars and I guess this was gobbled up pretty quickly. Now
that sponsorship has ended and with around 5 months until season 4
kicks off we are looking for a new sponsor. We are always
reinventing the circle.
I'm sure that there are some clever people within the
franchises that have the nous to do a better job and maybe its time
that control of the NZFC was handed to the clubs.
I think a lot of money was paid to SKY TV to broadcast the
highlights show and that is one of the problems. Any good
businessman would suggest that the TV rights would be worth money
to the game, not the otherway around. I mean there are a lot of
people here that subscribe to SKY for the football alone. Surely
they have some consumer power. What would SKY do if every person
that subbed to SKY handed back there subscription because there was
no local football on TV.
OK, many will argue that the local game doesn't come up to
spec but its all we have and we've got to try and develop it the
best we can, with the resources we have.
So do you reckon NZF can guide the NZFC into a quality
competition? Or do you think the franchises would be able to do a
better job. Discuss.
Permalink
Permalink
I think NZF can build the competition into a self-supporting,
viable comp but some things worry me.
With the carrot of OCL dangling I think the issue
is whether there will be enough of a spread of the cash. I can
see a couple of superclubs (by NZ standards, probably both auckland
based the way things are going) and the rest being also-rans, sort
of a smaller version of the Scottish Premier League but without the
bigotry or the porridge.
I think there needs to be a more even spread of the OCL/World
Club Championship cash that comes in, and this money should fund
the promtion of and playing of the league, at least until it can
sustain itself. If it doesn't look self-funding in, say, five
years, can it.
I'd also like to see it expanded to include a Fijian club and
maybe a Tahitian club. we've got to build up the region, not just
NZ.
Nix, Leyton Orient and Alloa Athletic supporting schmuck.
Permalink
Permalink
I know my ideas are full of holes, I'm really just think aloud on
this.
Nix, Leyton Orient and Alloa Athletic supporting schmuck.
Permalink
Permalink
Some good thoughts there The Jam. Isn't the OCL money already
distributed pretty evenly? Problem with including
Fijian/Tahitian teams is of course hte increased cost and the OCL
does achieve that to some extent. Think at the moment it has
a good grounding and really don't want to see another change in the
format, we have this now and I think that we have to run with
it. It all comes down to getting better players on the park
and establishing some traditions around the clubs so that people
aren't going to watch "a" team, they are going to watch "their"
team.
Normo's coming home
Permalink
Permalink
was there a fee for the phoenix to take up the licence ?
Permalink
Permalink
The money from making the World Club Champs at this stage is $670,000 which will head into Waitakere United's bank account once they get back from their match against the Japanese side. Should they progress further in the comp there will be more money.
But what happens next is that Waitakere will split the money
so that NZF gets a chunk, the 7 other franchises check a piece and
the balance is Waitaks. Last year the franchises picked up around
$58,000 each from Auckland City's WCC appearance. Waitakere will
also deduct any expenses incurred in getting to Japan.
I believe Auckland City may have picked up around a million so
it could be that this time the payouts will be less. NZF will take
a good slice of the $$.
Re the Phoenix paying a fee....I'd say that is where Terry's
first million has gone. Someone more in the know may be able to
extrapolate on this....
Permalink
Permalink
I think a significant amount of the loss is incurred by having to
fly to and from games. The NZFC should get sponsored by Air New
Zealand so, not only will they have a sponsor, they will also get
discounted flights and, over time, they will be able to accumulate
significant portions of money quicker.
Permalink
Permalink
And you don't think NZ Football have gone down that track? They've
approached Air New Zealand numorous times over the years. They get
the best deal they canl on the team travel, but it is still a
significant expense as you point out. However Air New Zealand don't
get a return as the game isn't screened live on TV here. That is
why they sponsor rugby. There has to be a return in order for a
sponsor to come on board.
Major sponsorship is keyed in with television and until we get
our NZFC product on regular TV it will be difficult to get new
sponsors. Retaining current sponsors is proving just as difficult.
And did you know we actually have to pay SKY to get it the NZFC on
TV.In the first season of the NZFC Waikato FC had to pay $12,000
just to get the home games filmed and I know Manawatu was paying up
over $15,000 to get their games done. It's not just a matter of
going along to a sponsor and getting them to sign up. Far from
it.
A lot of you really have no idea of the unseen costs that crop
up. For example, Hawkes Bay United on one ocassion had a charter
flight from Napier to Hamilton. Their plane broke down and a
replacement had to be sent from Auckland to Napier. The delay cost
Waikato FC because they had to pay Waikato Stadium staff for the
extra hours that they had to work due to the flight delay. The
game was broadcast live on Newstalk ZB and their man had to rip
back to the station to reprogramme a few things til the revised
kickoff was announced.
That happened a couple of times to Waikato and I bet the teams
that were late didn't front up with the $$. Admittedly it may have
not been the oppositions fault, but really they should have flown
out at 10am rather than 1pm or so close to the scheduled kickoff
time. There is quite a lot of bad organisation that needs
sorting.
Permalink
Permalink
Fair points Kiwi Canary, I didn't know about all those things.
Anybody know Sky TV's email address? I say we write to them and get
it signed (or as close to signed as is possible over the internet)
by all of the yellow fever members.
Permalink
Permalink
Sky is only worried about one thing. Money.
Write to TVNZ, if the government is happy to cough up millions for yachting (Which few kiwis can afford) and the rugby, then they shouldn't mind sliding NZF a few dollars to help make the national comp sustainable and possibly profitable.
i would be extremely happy to be able to sit down every sunday for a weekly match on TV1, atleast then i would know my taxes are going somewhere other than Cullens pockets
Write to TVNZ, if the government is happy to cough up millions for yachting (Which few kiwis can afford) and the rugby, then they shouldn't mind sliding NZF a few dollars to help make the national comp sustainable and possibly profitable.
i would be extremely happy to be able to sit down every sunday for a weekly match on TV1, atleast then i would know my taxes are going somewhere other than Cullens pockets
Permalink
Permalink
Sky gave up Formula one in New Zealand but the number of set top
boxes returned did made not make a differrence, it was the ad
sponsors around the broadcast that made the difference.
With NZFC struggling for such a supporter will it ever be
viable for SKY. Motorcycling NZ found enough support(ads in
and around the shows) to tempt TVNZ
to broadcast programs but I also think the recording
company was a fan. they also copyrighted all footage so others had
to pay to use it. Football New Zealand must retain ownership of all
footage.
Permalink
Permalink
FNZ would hold overall ownership of any football from the
NZFC, but I'd say that CTV would hold that for say the Canterbury
United DRAGONS. But it still goes back to the simple fact that
there is not enough money in the local game. The All Whites have a
poor record of late and so attracting advertisers isn't that easy.
If they were winning, then the problem wouldnt be so bad..but as
you all know a win in international football (outside of OFC) is a
rare thing for us.
With the U17's U20's and wimins teams all qualifying for the
various World Cup tournaments, NZF will be mortgaged up to the hilt
with arranging pre-tournament friendlies because they don't usually
get the money from qualifying until a month or two after the actual
event. So international football will take priority to the
NZFC.
Permalink
Permalink
Is it a possibility that this new Freeview system might be an
option for showing local football? Don`t know much about it myself.
Permalink
Permalink
The government has never helped sport in NZ. Smokefree transitional
sponsorship was nothing compared with the Winfield
contribution to Football. Now the pokie money has been
tampered with and again sport takes the fall. Yes there were
people taking personal benefits from this money but probably not
the amount no longer available to sport in NZ now.
Permalink
Permalink
I think that post misses the mark. The government assist sport
through SPARC who have a criteria of only recognising elite sports
or athletes. Football does not fit into this category although we
have received some funding since the womens teams have started
doing well. This is one reason for staying in the Oceania region.
So long as our U17 & U20 teams keep qualifying for World finals
we will keep receiving this funding.
What's sight without sound? Love without peace? Copulation without conception?
Permalink
Permalink
I think our Oyimpic games team has not Sparc funding.
But my main comment was that the general football family which
is where our elite
players come
from is on reducing spiral of funding and the goverment changes do
not help this.
players come
from is on reducing spiral of funding and the goverment changes do
not help this.
Permalink
Permalink
Spot on there. Why they don't fund sport on a per capita basis is
inexplicable. perhaps they need to incorporate an element of number
of participants in to say 50% of their funding. It would be
interesting to see the $'s per participant spent on a sport like
rowing compared to football.
What's sight without sound? Love without peace? Copulation without conception?
Permalink
Permalink
I think that post misses the mark. The government assist sport
through SPARC who have a criteria of only recognising elite sports
or athletes. Football does not fit into this category although we
have received some funding since the womens teams have started
doing well. This is one reason for staying in the Oceania region.
So long as our U17 & U20 teams keep qualifying for World finals
we will keep receiving this funding.
I guess that means movuing away from Oceania would mean less
funding then...assuming we don't make the WC's??
Permalink
Permalink
or the Olympics.
What's sight without sound? Love without peace? Copulation without conception?
Permalink
Permalink
Isn't the Olympics U20 i.e. easier to qualify for?
Permalink
Permalink
Isn't the Olympics U20 i.e. easier to qualify
for?
U23...
Permalink
Permalink
Definitely easier than the world cup, particularly now Aussie are
in Asia because there is a definite spot for Oceania.
What's sight without sound? Love without peace? Copulation without conception?
Permalink
Permalink
Isn't the Olympics U20 i.e. easier to qualify
for?
U23...
Oh yeah...thanks.

Permalink
Permalink
Getting back to Kiwi Canary's original point I think it is
important that the NZFC keeps running in its current format. The
standard of our younger players is gradually improving, this
coupled with some quality imports will see an increase in
attendance at games. I feel the summer based competition is a great
idea for the likes of me who still plays on a Saturday in winter
and would struggle to get to see many games live.
What's sight without sound? Love without peace? Copulation without conception?
Permalink
Permalink
I just worry where Graham Seatter is going regarding the NZFC. He
was quoted as saying he would be reluctant to see a "second rate"
side going to Japan again....referring to Auckland City.
Now to me that is 1] disprespectful of Auckland City and 2]
showing little faith in our own NZFC competition. Regardless of
what format the NZFC is run, be that franchise or going back to
club-based, we have to make this competition work. I still think it
is best played in summer and as my friend above says, the standard
is getting better. In the 80's the national league standard was
very good, but most teams were stacked with foreigners and we saw
few kiwi players getting the opportunity. These days we've done a
total reversal and we see kiwi talent being given a go. The imports
are still there but check where they come from...Solomon Islands,
Fiji and a few from the UK and other parts. We need to get our best
young players in the NZFC otherwise we are kidding ourselves that
we will get any better at a national level.
Permalink
Permalink
i think Graham Seatter is being fair in wanting the best going to
Japan, cos, lets face it, if 'we' (Oceania) dont start to be
competitive/professional then they'll A) pull us out or B) make it
even harder to get in.
remember, if we dont make it then the $$$ doesnt come in.
we need more money in the sport, God bless TS for showing the way...hopefully other well off people can follow his example and invest a bit of coin in the NZFC (250k would pay 6 players just under 42k a year on full time pro contracts, this could lead to transfer fees etc)
do the NZFC franchises have full time players? by that i mean football is all they do and they are paid by the 'club' (eg: I know Fisher takes off to Sweden to line the bank before coming back to Can U)
gings2007-06-23 21:54:50
remember, if we dont make it then the $$$ doesnt come in.
we need more money in the sport, God bless TS for showing the way...hopefully other well off people can follow his example and invest a bit of coin in the NZFC (250k would pay 6 players just under 42k a year on full time pro contracts, this could lead to transfer fees etc)
do the NZFC franchises have full time players? by that i mean football is all they do and they are paid by the 'club' (eg: I know Fisher takes off to Sweden to line the bank before coming back to Can U)
gings2007-06-23 21:54:50
Permalink
Permalink
Another good point Kiwi Canary. Seatter needs to think more
carefully before he says things like that, although I doubt he
meant to slate Auckland City. It is typical of administrators in
the game who make silly statements without regard to the wider
ramifications. This is one reason why I believe Ricki Herbert will
do well with the Phoenix, apart from his ability as a coach. He is
no mug in this area. What about a play off between the NZ based A
league team and the OCL winners to determine our representative in
the world club championship? This gives the island nations
incentive to improve as well.
What's sight without sound? Love without peace? Copulation without conception?
Permalink
Permalink
I'm dead against the Phoenix taking the NZ spot primarily because
they don't play in an Oceania Football Confederation competition.
They are playing in an Asian Football Confederation competition,
the A-League which is run by FFA. The only connection is they have
with NZ is thatthey are based in Wellington. And even if
they were given the opportunity whose to say they would do any
better than Auckland City or Waitakere United? They are a
professional team and yet they can't beat an amateur U20
side...c'mon now;-p
I think you will find that the OFC won't have a bar of it
anyway. I don't know where Seatter is heading with his comments but
someone needs to give the geezer some valium, calm him down and get
him focussed on his proper job.
Gings, there is no way NZFC sides can start paying players the
kind of coin you are mentioning. Firstly they would have to stop
taking money from the charitable trusts because they don't support
professional sports teams and secondly there ain't the crowds to
make it sustainable.
All franchises would go broke in one season. There are players
no doubt picking up 30K such as Menapi at Waitakere, but he will
have a sponsor stumping up the reddies and that is the backdoor way
we operate if we want to have the best players playing at our
particular NZFC side.
Michael Utting for example signed for Waikato and to help
negotiate the deal I bought him a second hand Ford Falcon and
someone else threw him some bucks. There are a number of variations
of these under the table deals and this sort of thing goes on all
the time.
The general rule of thumb is if an NZFC side is struggling,
then I would say they aren't paying the money to get the best
players in...
Permalink
Permalink
Yes the Phoenix should not be in the OFC championship. I think they
play A league with a dispensation only. And to take away the
OFC championship from NZFC will down grade the compition for
Franchises to an Elite NZ championship. (National League
style)
Permalink
Permalink
Kiwi Canary, i think you misunderstood my concept, it wasnt that
they pay as it is set up presently, but rather some
investors/sponsors etc do that and a pro contract is held with the
club/franchise (what ever you want to call it). ok i'll admit my
numbers probably are a bit unrealsitic at present.
the only way we are going to see the NZFC evolve into something sustainable that benifits football in NZ is if some professionalism (and money) comes in.
i am honestly suprised there is not a company that wishes to be the title sponsor of the nations premier football competition...i hate to say it but the future of this competition isnt looking flash without one of these coz without the league doesnt get promoted, and with out promotion theres no crowds etc etc
the only way we are going to see the NZFC evolve into something sustainable that benifits football in NZ is if some professionalism (and money) comes in.
i am honestly suprised there is not a company that wishes to be the title sponsor of the nations premier football competition...i hate to say it but the future of this competition isnt looking flash without one of these coz without the league doesnt get promoted, and with out promotion theres no crowds etc etc
Permalink
Permalink
Look I've been involved administratively with three national league
entities. Waikato United. Melville United and I founded Waikato FC
and I can tell you that there are no companies out there willing to
put in the money to sponsor the NZFC. I've been round long enough,
tried all avenues, but the simple fact is that it's a hard struggle
to get sponsorship for a franchise, let alone the entire league.
Your concept has merit, and I don't want to put a downer on it, but
even New Zealand Football can't find a sponsor of the league
outside of a charitable trust. The entry fee has been raised from
45,000 plus GST to $65,000 plus GST per franchise from this
season, so that is over half a million dollars for the 8 sides
to raise, on top of running costs and player "payments" etc.
NZF resources are fair too thin and I would go along with the
Otago United chairmans call for the NZFC to be administered
independantly of NZF - but allowing them to be involved in some
form - much like how the Premier League is run by a board of
control under the auspices of the FA.
Sponsors will only come if TV is involved and right now,
football would have to pay SKY TV to broadcast the games and the
cost is prohibitive. So no TV, no sponsor, it is that simple.
Permalink
Permalink
I just worry where Graham Seatter is going regarding the NZFC. He
was quoted as saying he would be reluctant to see a "second rate"
side going to Japan again....referring to Auckland City.
Now to me that is 1] disprespectful of Auckland City and 2]
showing little faith in our own NZFC competition.
I think Seatter is commenting on ACFC on a global scale, in
which they clearly are "second rate". His comments could have ben a
bit more diplomatic, granted, but he was justified in what he was
saying. Whether what he suggests about Phoenix taking their place
or not is justified is a different matter.
As for ACFC they are NZ's best and best-run club, but put
alongside the clubs they met in the World Club Champs they appear
to be out of their depth.
Now what would really work is for Phoenix to take over
Wellington's NZFC franchise, or to grab another licence if any are
ever made available, and to use the comp as a league for their
reserves
TheJam2007-06-25 08:23:26
Nix, Leyton Orient and Alloa Athletic supporting schmuck.
Permalink
Permalink
Sponsors will only come if TV is involved and right now, football
would have to pay SKY TV to broadcast the games and the cost is
prohibitive. So no TV, no sponsor, it is that simple.
One way to help make this happen is to get better turnout at
the games. YF website is as good a venue as any to encourage
turnout to the NZFC games.The franchises really don't have the cash
to spend up large on match venue/ time promotions. Those that are
passionate about NZFC (kiwi-Canary et.al) should be commended on
their efforts in keeping the profile of the NZFC high.


I reckon that if we could double turnouts (maybe a tough
ask) to around 1500-2000 per game, then TV coverage might just
become a dsitinct possibility. I know thia has been said
before, but when we consider how many families are connected to
football now, it is surprising that the turnout to the NZFC games
is still not brilliant. Are the clubs making announcements to all
junoirs about their local franchise upcomgin match? Are those who
are making trips in to games advertising any free seats in their
cars at the club? Perhpas junior coaches could shedule in an
NZFC game once in a while as training for the week?
Permalink
Permalink
I reckon that if we could double turnouts (maybe a tough ask) to
around 1500-2000 per game, then TV coverage might just become
a dsitinct possibility. I know thia has been said before, but when
we consider how many families are connected to football now, it is
surprising that the turnout to the NZFC games is still not
brilliant. Are the clubs making announcements to all junoirs about
their local franchise upcomgin match? Are those who are making
trips in to games advertising any free seats in their cars at the
club? Perhpas junior coaches could shedule in an NZFC game
once in a while as training for the week?
brilliant logic there. but, for me one of the reasons rugby is popular when it comes to going to see the game is because the bulk of the fans who attend the stadiums are players/coaches in the junior competitions, thus, the big games eg: NPC are mostly played in the evenings.
if the games were played later (i know, easier said than done) maybe crowds would be better.
maybe its time we all go bitch to the government to help[ fund the NZFC, they gave the rich boatees money, how about a 'common folk sport'?. it may do us some good now that HC is the ambassidor person for the WWC thats on the way.
Kiwi Canary: what sort of coin is the average NZFC player earning per week/game from the club/franchise?
gings2007-06-25 22:40:08
Permalink
Permalink

