Yeah but it's a back 5 - given the number of goals they concede it didn't sound unreasonable.
When you say back three it gives the imagine of two attacking wingers- Back five does not
Yeah that's why I said a back three with WING BACKS!
Posted September 14, 2015 05:21 · last edited March 18, 2021 07:43
Yeah but it's a back 5 - given the number of goals they concede it didn't sound unreasonable.
When you say back three it gives the imagine of two attacking wingers- Back five does not
Yeah that's why I said a back three with WING BACKS!
Yeah but it's a back 5 - given the number of goals they concede it didn't sound unreasonable.
When you say back three it gives the imagine of two attacking wingers- Back five does not
Yeah that's why I said a back three with WING BACKS!