Current version

Posted September 17, 2018 02:07 · last edited March 18, 2021 07:43

Yakcall wrote:

Shame about that website... WOW that is hard to read. Who thought mixing blue background with grey writing is a good idea.

Web basics ignored

Also, a couple of the players mentioned in the article are missing from the squad list below. I read the squad list first and thought, 'oh yeah not bad' but the extra players mentioned above make it a damn good squad

Previous versions

3 versions
Unknown editor edited March 18, 2021 07:43
Yakcall wrote:

Shame about that website... WOW that is hard to read. Who thought mixing blue background with grey writing is a good idea.

Web basics ignored

Also, a couple of the players mentioned in the article are missing from the squad list below. I read the squad list first and thought, 'oh yeah not bad' but the extra players mentioned above make it a damn good squad

Unknown editor edited September 17, 2018 02:08
Yakcall wrote:

Shame about that website... WOW that is hard to read. Who thought mixing blue background with grey writing is a good idea.

Web basics ignored

Also, a number of the players mentioned in the article are missing from the squad list below. I read the squad list first and thought, 'oh yeah not bad' but the extra players mentioned above make it a damn good squad

Unknown editor edited September 17, 2018 02:07
Yakcall wrote:

Shame about that website... WOW that is hard to read. Who thought mixing blue background with grey writing is a good idea.

Web basics ignored

Also, a number of the players mentioned in the article are missing from the squad list below. I read the squad list first and thought, oh yeah not bad' but the extra players listed above make it a damn good squad