Team Wellington... no longer an association with Ole. Chur

Woof Woof
2.7K
·
19K
·
almost 17 years

Second time I saw him play today. Played CB. My overall impression is of a competent player, but not much more than that.

Starting XI
70
·
3.1K
·
almost 14 years
el grapadura wrote:

Second time I saw him play today. Played CB. My overall impression is of a competent player, but not much more than that.


Oh yeah of course with Ivan out he'd have switched to CB. Good to know that he's competent at CB, as right back is where he can use his attributes the best, hopefully he gets a shot there ahead of Pritchett at some point and then I can re-eveluate him at this level. Appreciate the response.
Legend
1.8K
·
22K
·
over 15 years

Did Charlie Henry get a run on?


Woof Woof
2.7K
·
19K
·
almost 17 years

Yep, came on as a sub in the second half. Had one very good run that probably should have resulted in a goal but Watson was too late to get on the end of Henry's ball (this would have given 2-1 lead to TeeDubs).. Small, nippy kind of player, interested to see more of him.

Legend
1.8K
·
22K
·
over 15 years

Cheers EG.

Might have to pop over to DF and see TW sometime this season


(this would go down well with Chemical Ali et al - watching coalface footy due to a chap from Chelmsford!)

WeeNix
280
·
630
·
over 16 years

Hello there.

I would welcome a few thoughts and opinions from Wellington fans on what they made of their team after today's match.

(Imagine for a moment you are Jeff Vader and try and summon a few strong, well argued opinions with substantiating detail, about what you really think.)

Such stuff is helpful with betting decisions for us neutrals, but it's hard to get a fix on Wellington from afar because youse Wellington guys say relatively little of substance. 

Thanks in advance. 


Cock
2.7K
·
16K
·
almost 15 years

I'm flattered Bruce (I think)

Legend
1.8K
·
22K
·
over 15 years

it's hard to get a fix on Wellington from afar because youse Wellington guys say relatively little of substance. 


I take exception to your use of the word "relatively".


Early retirement
3.1K
·
34K
·
about 17 years
  • Score flattered Auckland
  • Matt Conger is just awful
  • Team Wellington better in the main than I expected
  • Tom Doyle my MOTM for the home side.
  • Nice not to be working covering it.

Probably not enough detail for you there though Bruce.
Tegal
·
Head Sleuth
3K
·
19K
·
about 17 years

Do we get a cut if any information we provide on here helps you win your bets....?

Cock
2.7K
·
16K
·
almost 15 years
Hard News wrote:
  • Score flattered Auckland
  • Matt Conger is just awful
  • Team Wellington better in the main than I expected
  • Tom Doyle my MOTM for the home side.
  • Nice not to be working covering it.

Probably not enough detail for you there though Bruce.
looked like a late blowout. What did the ref do?
Tegal
·
Head Sleuth
3K
·
19K
·
about 17 years
Jeff Vader wrote:
Hard News wrote:
  • Score flattered Auckland
  • Matt Conger is just awful
  • Team Wellington better in the main than I expected
  • Tom Doyle my MOTM for the home side.
  • Nice not to be working covering it.

Probably not enough detail for you there though Bruce.
looked like a late blowout. What did the ref do?
Sounds like N-Bomb called it then. What was the final score? Strangely it's not in this thread. 
RR
·
Bossi Insider
10K
·
34K
·
almost 16 years
Tegal wrote:
Jeff Vader wrote:
Hard News wrote:
  • Score flattered Auckland
  • Matt Conger is just awful
  • Team Wellington better in the main than I expected
  • Tom Doyle my MOTM for the home side.
  • Nice not to be working covering it.

Probably not enough detail for you there though Bruce.
looked like a late blowout. What did the ref do?

Sounds like N-Bomb called it then. What was the final score? Strangely it's not in this thread. 

TW 1 - ACFC 4. From what I gather via Twitter, it was 1-1 until a controversial goal late in the game. Then  ACFC scored another couple as TW chased the equaliser. 
Early retirement
3.1K
·
34K
·
about 17 years

Just awfully inconsistent and easily swayed by whining.

TeeDubs player got booked for kicking a ball away at restart.  ACFC repeatedly did the same including two finishes well after the whistle had gone which were just ignored.

WeeNix
280
·
630
·
over 16 years

Good start, Hard. But putting aside the ref and the Aucks, how did the overall team performance compare with last year at the same stage?

Is the Wellington team really as youthful as the ASB site match report suggested?

Would Spoonley have made any difference?

First impressions of the new signings?

Any disappointments in the individual performances? Any glaring inadequacies?

We'll turn you into Hard Vader yet.



WeeNix
280
·
630
·
over 16 years

On the subject of player whining, it would be a fun exercise to formulate a league table based on the skills and output of the various teams.

I've always felt my home team, Waikato, were somewhat remedial in this respect, and with skipper Aaron Scott being Politeness Man, don't see it changing much, even with a few bolshy Aucklanders in the squad.

By contrast I have long admired the ability of both Auckland clubs to raise the bar for whinging  - based I guess on a decent cross-pollination of players from winter northern league who have found it an effective mechanism at lower level. Why I think the Auckland teams deserve special praise is that because overall they have achieved far more success than other teams - yet  this has not been inversely proportional to the volume of on-field moaning.

Wellington's whinge-ability will skyrocket when Adam Cowan gets on the pitch.

You'd have to have Canterbury high up on account of the Russell Kamo factor - possibly an MVP in this sphere - and while this is purely subjective, I always felt Hawke's Bay batted above the odds in terms of whinging.

But that's just me. Welcome any other whinges about whingers. Have a decent moan. Complain your socks off. 


Woof Woof
2.7K
·
19K
·
almost 17 years

It was a pretty encouraging performance, especially considering how late the squad was assembled. The backline had a very makeshift look to it: Lindsay at RB, Doyle at LB, and Peverley and Musa at CB. Looked pretty shaky in the first 10-15 minutes, and that's were Auckland's first goal came from. ACFC focused on attacking Doyle's flank in the first half, he did a pretty decent job overall. Lindsay did a very good job on Krishna.

Teedubs settled into the game after about 15, and from that point on it was pretty even, with periods of dominance from the TeeDubs. The key to getting back into the game was the combativeness in the middle of the park, ACFC could not settle on the ball, and coughed it up on fairly regularly. Much of this was thanks to Justin Gulley, who was excellent in pressing the ball in the middle of the park and forced a lot of mistakes, including quite a few from the Croatian donkey. Jamie De Abreu scored a solo goal from outside the box, he certainly brings a bit of a spark to the team. A very willing runner, and tries to get involved at every opportunity. He was getting tired in the second half, and had a couple of bad crosses and made some bad decisions, but he seems a promising attacking outlet. Fa'arodo didn't do much, and Watson is still unconvincing for me - he was very ineffective yesterday, and that could well be the problem for TeeDubs for the remainder of the season in the big games. Charlie Henry came on late in the second half, had one very good run that should have been a goal for Watson. Hard to assess a player in that short amount of time, but I'm interested in seeing more of him.

ACFC's second goal killed off the game - I think there were calls for offside, it was on the far side from us so hard to tell what really happened. Having said that McPeake should have done much better than he did, he dived over the top of it and it squeezed in under him. He also should have done much better with the first, where he was easily beaten at the near post. On the other had, he pulled out a couple of great saves too. If Spoonley had been there, would it have been different? You would like to think yes, that second goal was pretty average keeping.

The second goal killed the game - it visibly deflated TeeDub players, and ACFC showed their quality and managed to keep hold of possession much more easily in this period (last 10 minutes), with Tee Dubs never looking likely to get another equaliser. The game blew out with another couple of late goals to make the scoreline very flattering for ACFC. I thought draw would have been a perfectly fair outcome in this game. Having said that, I expect ACFC to steamroll the opposition this season, but on the evidence of yesterday's game, TeeDubs could have a shot at 2nd spot this season.

Must try harder
96
·
1.5K
·
about 17 years

Surely all  these questions would be well covered by the NZF / ASB Prems media ....[ rofl ]

Not Boyd
420
·
3.7K
·
over 16 years


The second goal, Krishna pushed Peverley (maybe Musa) as he was going for a header. You know where they lean in as they jump and spoil the defenders jump .From my point of view it was a clear foul which the ref didn't call. TW were also calling for offside but it wasn't.

The third goal seemed to be either a classy finish or a shank off the side of his boot from a cross? Looked like our keeper let the ball go in near post too.

I think TW put up a good fight but Auckland were better overall. Scoreline was probably unfair.

Some pretty good play from TW but will need to be more clinical if they want to compete at the top.

Auckland team are also full of giants! The midfielders all looked like basketballers and we have shorties. Don't know if that makes a difference just interesting! Good support from Auckland too. Chanting and singing all game...well done

Marquee
970
·
6.5K
·
over 11 years
el grapadura wrote:

It was a pretty encouraging performance, especially considering how late the squad was assembled. The backline had a very makeshift look to it: Lindsay at RB, Doyle at LB, and Peverley and Musa at CB. Looked pretty shaky in the first 10-15 minutes, and that's were Auckland's first goal came from. ACFC focused on attacking Doyle's flank in the first half, he did a pretty decent job overall. Lindsay did a very good job on Krishna.

Teedubs settled into the game after about 15, and from that point on it was pretty even, with periods of dominance from the TeeDubs. The key to getting back into the game was the combativeness in the middle of the park, ACFC could not settle on the ball, and coughed it up on fairly regularly. Much of this was thanks to Justin Gulley, who was excellent in pressing the ball in the middle of the park and forced a lot of mistakes, including quite a few from the Croatian donkey. Jamie De Abreu scored a solo goal from outside the box, he certainly brings a bit of a spark to the team. A very willing runner, and tries to get involved at every opportunity. He was getting tired in the second half, and had a couple of bad crosses and made some bad decisions, but he seems a promising attacking outlet. Fa'arodo didn't do much, and Watson is still unconvincing for me - he was very ineffective yesterday, and that could well be the problem for TeeDubs for the remainder of the season in the big games. Charlie Henry came on late in the second half, had one very good run that should have been a goal for Watson. Hard to assess a player in that short amount of time, but I'm interested in seeing more of him.

ACFC's second goal killed off the game - I think there were calls for offside, it was on the far side from us so hard to tell what really happened. Having said that McPeake should have done much better than he did, he dived over the top of it and it squeezed in under him. He also should have done much better with the first, where he was easily beaten at the near post. On the other had, he pulled out a couple of great saves too. If Spoonley had been there, would it have been different? You would like to think yes, that second goal was pretty average keeping.

The second goal killed the game - it visibly deflated TeeDub players, and ACFC showed their quality and managed to keep hold of possession much more easily in this period (last 10 minutes), with Tee Dubs never looking likely to get another equaliser. The game blew out with another couple of late goals to make the scoreline very flattering for ACFC. I thought draw would have been a perfectly fair outcome in this game. Having said that, I expect ACFC to steamroll the opposition this season, but on the evidence of yesterday's game, TeeDubs could have a shot at 2nd spot this season.

Ha ha. Had to get that in El Grap. Expected.

Early retirement
3.1K
·
34K
·
about 17 years

As for how they looked compared to the same time last season?

Significantly better to me.  Last season the FSE lads were younger and some clearly not up to ASB Premiership standard so Team Wellington were dreadful until a bit more of the local steel joined the squad and made the line-ups.  That steel was already there yesterday and despite where we were a week ago there is a bit of depth with Hobbs, Bertsch, Cowan, Henry either on the bench or still to come into selection criteria.

Away to Waitak next week will be a challenge.

Cock
2.7K
·
16K
·
almost 15 years

On the subject of player whining, it would be a fun exercise to formulate a league table based on the skills and output of the various teams.

I've always felt my home team, Waikato, were somewhat remedial in this respect, and with skipper Aaron Scott being Politeness Man, don't see it changing much, even with a few bolshy Aucklanders in the squad.

By contrast I have long admired the ability of both Auckland clubs to raise the bar for whinging  - based I guess on a decent cross-pollination of players from winter northern league who have found it an effective mechanism at lower level. Why I think the Auckland teams deserve special praise is that because overall they have achieved far more success than other teams - yet  this has not been inversely proportional to the volume of on-field moaning.

Wellington's whinge-ability will skyrocket when Adam Cowan gets on the pitch.

You'd have to have Canterbury high up on account of the Russell Kamo factor - possibly an MVP in this sphere - and while this is purely subjective, I always felt Hawke's Bay batted above the odds in terms of whinging.

But that's just me. Welcome any other whinges about whingers. Have a decent moan. Complain your socks off. 

HA! Brilliant. I definitely agree on Kamo. Would share the most overrated award with Feneridis as well.
Cock
2.7K
·
16K
·
almost 15 years

He is not wrong though. In a franchise where players come in and seem better than at their previous teams, he does not look like a standout. I think if he were at another team where they were chasing it more and dominating less (as ACFC do), he would be just another John Smith with a number on his back.

Starting XI
1.8K
·
4.1K
·
over 17 years

how did colin murphy go?

Woof Woof
2.7K
·
19K
·
almost 17 years

Not impressed, thought he was the weakest central midfielder on show.

Starting XI
1.8K
·
4.1K
·
over 17 years

interesting that

he made the MLS draft, he's skipper, and kept bertsch (who i rate considerably) out of the starting team, so you'd think he was pretty good

good write up btw el grap

Not Boyd
420
·
3.7K
·
over 16 years
el grapadura wrote:

Not impressed, thought he was the weakest central midfielder on show.

Agree...bring back Wiremu

Stage Punch
2.1K
·
11K
·
almost 17 years
reg22 wrote:

interesting that

he made the MLS draft, he's skipper, and kept bertsch (who i rate considerably) out of the starting team, so you'd think he was pretty good

good write up btw el grap


This surprised me a great deal.

Some folks down the line for me were muttering gravely about Miramafia and Lower Hutt boys not getting along with Calcott.
Trialist
18
·
120
·
over 12 years

TW doing well until Calcott took Ferado and Chettleburgh off

Must try harder
96
·
1.5K
·
about 17 years

What crowd nos ?


Actually ( it being TW ) what crowd names....

Starting XI
1.8K
·
4.1K
·
over 17 years

ha ha

so far we have smithy and his missus. 

Marquee
1.1K
·
7.6K
·
almost 13 years
zoro wrote:

TW doing well until Calcott took Ferado and Chettleburgh off

Closed Shop !
WeeNix
57
·
830
·
about 13 years
FU BLU wrote:

What crowd nos ?


Actually ( it being TW ) what crowd names....


Probably not more than 200 - I was there.
Marquee
1.1K
·
7.6K
·
almost 13 years
alireggae wrote:
FU BLU wrote:

What crowd nos ?


Actually ( it being TW ) what crowd names....


Probably not more than 200 - I was there.

Yes lost numbers due to clash with big ASB game in Petone. Hope for no clash next home game. I may be there!
Stage Punch
2.1K
·
11K
·
almost 17 years
Blew.2 wrote:
alireggae wrote:
FU BLU wrote:

What crowd nos ?


Actually ( it being TW ) what crowd names....


Probably not more than 200 - I was there.

Yes lost numbers due to clash with big ASB game in Petone. Hope for no clash next home game. I may be there!

How many though, really?

I reckon that was pretty much your stock standard TW crowd.
Must try harder
96
·
1.5K
·
about 17 years

Higher than last year then ?

Trialist
18
·
120
·
over 12 years
RR
·
Bossi Insider
10K
·
34K
·
almost 16 years

TW paying $6 to win this weekend, $5.50 for the draw.

Stage Punch
2.1K
·
11K
·
almost 17 years

TW paying $6 to win this weekend, $5.50 for the draw.


They were at $9 when 2ndBest and I got on them...COYTW!
Starting XI
70
·
3.1K
·
almost 14 years

Team Wellington... no longer an association with Ole. Chur

You’ll need an account to join the conversation!

Sign in Sign up