Phoenix Academy
10
·
230
·
about 14 years
Canterbury were poor.. Losing to "Route one" football is poor from them. They tried to play football and lost.. Win ugly or lose pretty
Jeff Vader wrote:

I took a stroll through Stuff this morning and you could not find two more opposite reports on the 1 game

http://www.stuff.co.nz/waikato-times/sport/9384577/WaiBop-open-with-deserved-victory

http://www.stuff.co.nz/sport/football/9384214/10-man-team-unable-to-hold-out-WaiBop

 

You would have to think the Waikato Times version was correct based on the fact it was in their town

Starting XI
70
·
3.1K
·
almost 14 years

I found Braithwaite's quotes very funny - I can't remember them stringing more than 10 passes together really, they were really quite poor and often just hoofed it forward to the wings. In the first 30 minutes, WaiBOP were just as much to blame, but after that they really starting playing some nice football, so Keith is being a bit one-eyed there.

Of course, since Tony Smith couldn't be at the game, he has to report on what Braithwaite said, so he's in a tough position in that regard. 

I felt WaiBOP deserved the victory, Canterbury didn't even have a shot on target in the second half from memory, while WaiBOP looked good. The impact of no Clapham, and Marquez for that matter, was telling.

Phoenix Academy
21
·
360
·
almost 15 years

Shaydon Young playing for WaiBOP? Did not know that. Good player but didn't realise he was playing in the ASB.

Did McNab get on at all N-Bomb? He's a good bloke and sure knows how to finish a chance, hope he can get some game time this season.


 

Starting XI
70
·
3.1K
·
almost 14 years

Yeah McNab came off the bench for about five/ten minutes, I don't think he'll ever start a game but as you say, if the ball falls to him in the right place then watch out.

I was a bit surprised to see Young get the nod to start, he is a good player, solid but not spectacular yesterday, he gives you good workrate and passing though and that's a key part of WaiBOP's gameplan. Got himself in good areas and had a chance which he hit over, he certainly could contribute this year.

RR
·
Bossi Insider
11K
·
34K
·
about 16 years

Up 1-0 over ACFC atm.

RR
·
Bossi Insider
11K
·
34K
·
about 16 years
RR
·
Bossi Insider
11K
·
34K
·
about 16 years

Penalty ACFC, 2-1.

Phoenix Academy
10
·
230
·
about 14 years

Waibop  looked well organised today.. They had a fair share of the ball and were guilty of not punishing auckland city for defensive errors. Where  all the injury time canme from is anyones guess.  Wasnt even a stoppage in the first hal which would warrant any injury time. 

The penalty was soft , Browne still managed to run 5more yards and get a cross in.. Then went down.

Auckland s big fella at the. Back looked average when pressed and the asian left back goes backward s every pass. 

Aucklands pace will cause alot of problems with krishna , white and de vires.. Far more direct  now than they have been in other years.

Refing was poor  both team.. Must have been getting assessed  causig the whistle happy display we saw.



Cock
2.7K
·
16K
·
about 15 years

So that's the second game on the trot that the score line has blown out in the last 10 mins to flatter ACFC? I would not have picked that.

Fan
Trialist
20
·
97
·
about 11 years

This ref costed Waikato FC twice last year. He gave Waitakere a soft pen to win 1-0 in round 2 and then failed to give Waikato FC a penalty against Wellington where they lost 1-0

Not up tp ASB level, waikato did put in a complaint last year against him but it fell on deaf ears

Good showing by Waibop, they will miss Maxsim when he heads oversees after round 4

Auckland have got pace to burn. I rate White very highly. Canterbury will miss him sorely

Trialist
8
·
40
·
about 11 years

Thought WaiBop played very well against ACFC today and if it weren't for a few dubious calls they would have come away with at least a point. The penalty wasn't really a penalty and a ridiculous amount of stoppage time was played. 3-1 flatters Auckland City big time.

Starting XI
70
·
3.1K
·
almost 14 years

Pretty much agree with all that has been said already.

I thought WaiBOP defended superbly, all over the park, they denied Auckland space in the midfield, and then managed to employ a very effective zone defence to quell the speculative balls chucked forward from the back, perfectly content to let players run parallel runs in front of the back four. The centre back pairing of Yokota and Lissette were outstanding, led by Aaron Scott.

The penalty was very controversial, the fact that it took us five minutes to figure out what exactly it was for tells it all really - and then Browne capped it off with a peach of a goal (Manko's was rather good too), Browne really is the new Marco in terms of coming off the bench and providing an impact every single time.

While City had more chances, it was some really good defending by WaiBOP, and they can feel slightly aggrieved to not grab a point. Regardless, a really promising display, now they have to take care of business against the likes of Hawke's Bay next week to truly prove their potential playoff credentials.

TV
On probation
250
·
4.2K
·
over 13 years

Why is david browne still playing for auck city? Need him to stick round to become illegible for NZ tho i guess

Trialist
6
·
150
·
over 16 years
N-Bomb wrote:

Pretty much agree with all that has been said already.

I thought WaiBOP defended superbly, all over the park, they denied Auckland space in the midfield, and then managed to employ a very effective zone defence to quell the speculative balls chucked forward from the back, perfectly content to let players run parallel runs in front of the back four. The centre back pairing of Yokota and Lissette were outstanding, led by Aaron Scott.

The penalty was very controversial, the fact that it took us five minutes to figure out what exactly it was for tells it all really - and then Browne capped it off with a peach of a goal (Manko's was rather good too), Browne really is the new Marco in terms of coming off the bench and providing an impact every single time.

While City had more chances, it was some really good defending by WaiBOP, and they can feel slightly aggrieved to not grab a point. Regardless, a really promising display, now they have to take care of business against the likes of Hawke's Bay next week to truly prove their potential playoff credentials.

+1
TV
On probation
250
·
4.2K
·
over 13 years

Far better prodpect than boyd

TV
On probation
250
·
4.2K
·
over 13 years
TV
On probation
250
·
4.2K
·
over 13 years

Unless he is or isnt already

Phoenix Academy
130
·
360
·
almost 13 years
Must try harder
96
·
1.5K
·
over 17 years
theidiot wrote:

Thought WaiBop played very well against ACFC today and if it weren't for a few dubious calls they would have come away with at least a point. The penalty wasn't really a penalty and a ridiculous amount of stoppage time was played. 3-1 flatters Auckland City big time.


Penalty was right ...just very dumb and very  late ...
Marquee
970
·
6.5K
·
over 11 years

Browne beat his man then got clipped. Simple as that.

Phoenix Academy
10
·
230
·
about 14 years

Penalty was weak, but had to be given. No chance the peno would have been given the other way. Ref seemed almost scared to pick Auckland up for anything.

He gave Auckland an indirect freekick in the box after 17mins for Andy Mcneil apparently holding on to the ball longer than "6secs"..  Never seen this given before other than in the last 10mins of a game. 

Starting XI
70
·
3.1K
·
almost 14 years

While I don't agree with some of his decisions, I do think that it is very unfair to question the integrity and neutrality of the referee. The more likely scenario is that he just made a few poor decision, and WaiBOP were on the receiving end of the biggest ones. It's not like the Auckland crowd was intimidating in any sense of the word.

Phoenix Academy
10
·
230
·
about 14 years

Fair point N-Bomb - Just saying how I saw it. Will be surprised if anyone picks up a point in Auckland though.

Waibop were to blame for not putting away there own opportunities.

Marquee
970
·
6.5K
·
over 11 years
boganville wrote:

Penalty was weak, but had to be given. No chance the peno would have been given the other way. Ref seemed almost scared to pick Auckland up for anything.

He gave Auckland an indirect freekick in the box after 17mins for Andy Mcneil apparently holding on to the ball longer than "6secs"..  Never seen this given before other than in the last 10mins of a game. 

I thought it was because he had hold of the ball when he stepped outside his area.

Cock
2.7K
·
16K
·
about 15 years

That would not be an indirect FK then.

Marquee
970
·
6.5K
·
over 11 years
Starting XI
70
·
3.1K
·
almost 14 years

Agreed Boganville.

And yeah, that's what we eventually figured out what it was for, handling outside the box would be a yellow as well wouldn't it? And the definitely had to take it indirectly. A weird ruling but I guess it technically was correct.

Starting XI
920
·
2.5K
·
over 12 years

in the second half he was over the line about 2 or 3 times when punting as well (although the lino didn't pick it up), also as a neutral i thought it was a pen - always a bit of a giveaway when the tackler dosn't even get up let alone look at the referee when the pen call was made.

I thought WaiBop looked much better than in the past - and while i thought they struggled at the back and in the middle at times they seemed to scramble pretty well.

Auckland were pretty poor in parts i thought and there would be a few players that wouldn't have done their CWC chances much good.

Thought John Irvine was pretty good by the way N-bomb - hard to know weather A-league is a step too far but def deserves a look.

Cock
2.7K
·
16K
·
about 15 years

Did the Phoenix sign the wrong ACFC player?

Starting XI
70
·
3.1K
·
almost 14 years

Yeah I thought Irv was solid as always, not his greatest game but certainly he showed off his defensive abilities this time, WaiBOP couldn't get anything going down the right hand side, and his technique is so superb that he could volley everything away with ease. I do think he'll be a great addition for Auckland if they let him play RB consistently, he's a good CB too but it's on the wing where he can really use his pace, crossing and technique to best effect - and I assume he'll get a run there every game (if he can beat out Pritchett) when Ivan comes back

Trialist
0
·
60
·
almost 12 years
Jerzy Merino wrote:

Browne beat his man then got clipped. Simple as that.


Browne beats his man, got touched, didn't fell down, continued his run another few meters crossed the ball, and when nothing came out of it fell down and got penalty??? Simple as that.
Ref did have very poor game and most of the decisions went Auckland's way. I don't think it was deliberate, but he didn't gave impression of someone who can handle such a high intensity game. Not sure where he found 3 minutes of extra time either (each half). Several times dangeour for WaiBop came as a result of fouls not given to Waikato.
In addition, every time when Auckland was pressed high up the field they struggled. This should be of concern to Ramon because that is exactly what will happen in Morocco. 
Draw was probably a fair result, but WaiBop paid the price for not scoring from two, second half, very good opportunities. Good learning courve...
Starting XI
70
·
3.1K
·
almost 14 years

Considering the fourth official was the one who signaled the three minutes both time, you can't blame the ref for that. There were some injuries in the game but I can't remember in what half, definitely there should have been 3 added mins in the second stanza.

First Team Squad
69
·
1K
·
about 17 years
N-Bomb wrote:

Agreed Boganville.

And yeah, that's what we eventually figured out what it was for, handling outside the box would be a yellow as well wouldn't it? And the definitely had to take it indirectly. A weird ruling but I guess it technically was correct.


 

It could be a yellow. Doesn't have to be dependant on the circumstances.

If it was an IDFK then there is no way it could be for handling outside the area,



First Team Squad
69
·
1K
·
about 17 years

N-Bomb wrote:

Considering the fourth official was the one who signaled the three minutes both time, you can't blame the ref for that. There were some injuries in the game but I can't remember in what half, definitely there should have been 3 added mins in the second stanza.


The 4th Off gets a signal from the referee of how many minutes to add. He only shows the number the referee tells him to show.


Starting XI
70
·
3.1K
·
almost 14 years

True. I stand by my second point though - there were enough subs and injuries to make three added minutes a legitimate option.

Must try harder
96
·
1.5K
·
over 17 years
AlanFord wrote:
Jerzy Merino wrote:

Browne beat his man then got clipped. Simple as that.


Browne beats his man, got touched, didn't fell down, continued his run another few meters crossed the ball, and when nothing came out of it fell down and got penalty??? Simple as that.

Ref did have very poor game and most of the decisions went Auckland's way. I don't think it was deliberate, but he didn't gave impression of someone who can handle such a high intensity game. Not sure where he found 3 minutes of extra time either (each half). Several times dangeour for WaiBop came as a result of fouls not given to Waikato.

In addition, every time when Auckland was pressed high up the field they struggled. This should be of concern to Ramon because that is exactly what will happen in Morocco. 

Draw was probably a fair result, but WaiBop paid the price for not scoring from two, second half, very good opportunities. Good learning courve...


Seriously ?  I must go to the same games you do ...the one I was at even the Waibop fans were stunned by the stupidity of the Jap boy Browne was gone and it was more the sheer desperation to get him down , and the contact made ,  that did throw him off balance made it have to be a pen ...
First Team Squad
69
·
1K
·
about 17 years

Oh sure. There is rarely a game where there won't be less than 3 minutes per half. 

Trialist
0
·
60
·
almost 12 years
FU BLU wrote:
AlanFord wrote:
Jerzy Merino wrote:

Browne beat his man then got clipped. Simple as that.


Browne beats his man, got touched, didn't fell down, continued his run another few meters crossed the ball, and when nothing came out of it fell down and got penalty??? Simple as that.

Ref did have very poor game and most of the decisions went Auckland's way. I don't think it was deliberate, but he didn't gave impression of someone who can handle such a high intensity game. Not sure where he found 3 minutes of extra time either (each half). Several times dangeour for WaiBop came as a result of fouls not given to Waikato.

In addition, every time when Auckland was pressed high up the field they struggled. This should be of concern to Ramon because that is exactly what will happen in Morocco. 

Draw was probably a fair result, but WaiBop paid the price for not scoring from two, second half, very good opportunities. Good learning courve...


Seriously ?  I must go to the same games you do ...the one I was at even the Waibop fans were stunned by the stupidity of the Jap boy Browne was gone and it was more the sheer desperation to get him down , and the contact made ,  that did throw him off balance made it have to be a pen ...


No problem, will get you a free ticket and a pair of glasses...

Just to add... You guys record every game, so hopefully highlights will be available on AFAC website. If got this wrong, more than happy to apologise and get a pair of glasses myself. 

Starting XI
70
·
3.1K
·
almost 14 years

Slefandorfas may be back for the HBU game, his hamstring is coming on fine but he now has the flu, he'll be a reasonable asset to how the team want to play when he gets fully fit. 

Starting XI
1.8K
·
4.1K
·
over 17 years

oh, so it was hamstring and not attitude.  that's good to hear.  i really rated this guy when he played for canterbury

You’ll need an account to join the conversation!

Sign in Sign up