National League / OCL

Why cant any kiwis make a football career

57 replies · 14,959 views
almost 19 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Perhaps that explains why Paul Urlovic made is good overseas.....hmmm, he is a Kiwi with a Euro background. Driving trucks these days.
Permalink Permalink
almost 19 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Perhaps that explains why Paul Urlovic made is good overseas.....hmmm, he is a Kiwi with a Euro background. Driving trucks these days.
 
Yes, but it's the way he drives them that makes him stand out. He's all European class when behind the wheel.
Nix, Leyton Orient and Alloa Athletic supporting schmuck.

Permalink Permalink
almost 19 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
It's not really the standard of football here that is the problem. It's a two fold combination of money and the public perception (controlled by the media) of our sport.
The money issue is complicated by the fact that NZ Soccer takes so much out of the clubs (and the available funding pool) to fund their own administration & programmes because the government (through SPARC) refuses to recognise football as an elite sport. Even if the government would fund football on a head count basis we would be better off. Also in the mix is the fact that their are far to many small clubs in existence in this country and to many competitions.
The public perception is of a sport with low self esteem. This is controlled by the media who repetitively publish negative stories regarding football, essentially reinforcing rugby's position as the premier sporting code in our country. This in turn deters all but a few sponsors from getting involved (particularly at a local level).
The answer is therefore two fold. We need to get people (like Terry Siriposis) who have a passion for football and are involved in business management to get involved in clubs, then we need to reward their interest by turning up and supporting their clubs.
By supporting their clubs we will get the media attention the game needs (and deserves) and hopefully it will keep the sponsors interested. With increased media attention better stories and a more responsive media should result.
My summation is that it is nothing to do with the quality of the players. These players already exist in huge numbers around the world. It is more to do with the quality of the coaching & admin staff, sponsors, owners etc. In the past this has been very poor ( the Rufer brothers excepted) - remember Chris Turner?
Has anyone else noticed that for any NZ team to enter the A League we have to construct a completely new club? We can't get an existing club to go there?

What's sight without sound? Love without peace? Copulation without conception?

Permalink Permalink
almost 19 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I have never been able to understand the need for so many clubs in Auckland. There must be nearly fifty at a guess.
Permalink Permalink
almost 19 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Roughly 30 in Christchurch - some of them based around one team. Absolutely ridiculous.

What's sight without sound? Love without peace? Copulation without conception?

Permalink Permalink
almost 19 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I've been on about the amount of clubs for years.  I suspect this is the reasoning behind Soccer 2's decision to keep culling the Northern League divisions. I remember once being able to count something like 10 clubs within about a 10 K radius in South Auckland. Ridiculous.
(Try it; Clendon Utd, Manurewa, Papatoetoe, Onehunga Mangere, Mangere Town, South Auckland Rangers, Otahuhu Utd, Manukau City, Papakura City, High School Old Boys, that's off the top of my head, and I'm sure I've missed some.)
When I was involved with a South Auckland club in the early 90's (Mangere Town), we approached a tiny club near us (3 senior men's teams, no women's or juniors) with regard to amalgamation. We saw it as the only way to survive. After some discussion they declined, saying they liked the identity of their club, which struck me as weird as they didn't have clubrooms or a ground to call their own. A few years later they vanished (High School Old Boys, in case anyone is wondering), as did Mangere Town.
It is this sort of selfish, narrow minded, protect-you-own-corner thinking that has screwed club soccer, certainly in Auckland at least.
Nix, Leyton Orient and Alloa Athletic supporting schmuck.

Permalink Permalink
almost 19 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Getting back to Ronaldoknow's posting, there are some good points there but it isn't "getting" people like Terry S involved involved in the game - rather than it is more "finding" people like him who love the game and are willing to invest. I know a couple of millionaires here in Hamilton who I approached when setting up Waikato FC. They gave me their time but then said that because the amount of infighting between clubs over the years, they just wouldn't get involved even though the loved the game. Until the infighting is sorted out it's highly likely things won't change - at least here in the Waikato. My old mate THE JAM makes a good point about the selfish and narrow-mindedness of clubs and he's spot on the mark.
Oh and just to correct you Ronaldoknow, Central United / Auckland City was approached by the old Soccer Australia (now FFA) a few years ago about taking over the licence from the Knights. They could see how well that club was run and they have a solid club structure in place and an approach was made to gauge there interest. Time shows that they turned down the opportunity.
 
Permalink Permalink
almost 19 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Yea I agree. There are already people in business that have an interest in the sport but treat the game like a rotting corpse. Maybe that is because the admin has been sub standard and to self interested. A case in point down here is the schools vs clubs argument. Thanks for the info on Central/Auckland, I wasn't aware of that. We had a great time in Auckland for the NZFC final 2 years ago. On the Friday called into Soccer Scene at Pt. Chev and bought my son some boots and other bits and pieces then on our way back to our motel passed Kiwitea St. so stopped in and had a kick around on the pitch the day before the final. The final itself was brilliant and a testament to strength of the club. Only wish the same could happen down here. People don't seem to support their club in their local area and clubs struggle when they lose their better young players to schools, especially if those players came from a so called smaller/weaker club which they don't return to. However this is not the only reason clubs struggle. In ChCh the biggest club is Burnside who have over 1000 members but can't make it in to the top grade. This year they are paying some players and may still fail to make the grade. They struggle to retain their better young players because they are perceived to be a "weak" team.

What's sight without sound? Love without peace? Copulation without conception?

Permalink Permalink
almost 19 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
There are some good administrators but from my own personal experience they end up either not being listened to or the older heads carry the weight to outvote you.
One idea re the problem you mention: schools v clubs, I'd like to see it that school football is floodlit and midweek. It would be great to go to a floodlit schools football match midweek and then that keeps the weekend clear for club football. Hockey are geared up for this but football has spent too much of the money dragged into the game on players and other extraneous stuff, whereas if we developed proper facilities with floodlights we'd be in a much stronger position to be able to work together to make the game work better. You'd find a lot of people would come out to support the schools and they would not only attract other fans, who aren't parents etc but they would get better publicity and promotion of their own secondary schools competitions.
I must say I would be more inclined to support a club that develops young players rather than pay players to ensure the senior team does well. That does nothing for the game, as the pay for players gig is cyclic. Island Bay have done it, Wairarapa United...Richmond United - and I see they got hammered 6-0 recently, after all the paid players departed when the money disappeared.
Look at Central United. I spoke with a club board member today and he said this winter the objective for the Northern Premier League side was to secure a midtable finish and avoid relegation. It's a relatively young side, and yet they top the league. That is what happens when you have a development plan in place. It's not an overnight thing but Central have always brough along some good players. Meantime all around them, the other sides are throwing money (and you can bet some of it is charitable trust coin disguised as something else) to players just to try and secure a top placing in a competition with no prize money. You gotta ask yourself who is crazy here.
Permalink Permalink
almost 19 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
The Burnside mens team might be weak (I'm not sure if it is, just assuming from Ronaldoknow's comments) but believe me, at the younger levels they have some class players. Last season, when I played junior-youth (15-16th grade combined) there were about 15 players in my team and all of the players were good, but some of them were phenomenal, we went the whole season unbeaten and were top of the table. I would be quite surprised if, in future, some of those players aren't playing in the NZFC or above.
Permalink Permalink
almost 19 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
There are some good administrators but from my own personal experience they end up either not being listened to or the older heads carry the weight to outvote you.
One idea re the problem you mention: schools v clubs, I'd like to see it that school football is floodlit and midweek. It would be great to go to a floodlit schools football match midweek and then that keeps the weekend clear for club football. Hockey are geared up for this but football has spent too much of the money dragged into the game on players and other extraneous stuff, whereas if we developed proper facilities with floodlights we'd be in a much stronger position to be able to work together to make the game work better. You'd find a lot of people would come out to support the schools and they would not only attract other fans, who aren't parents etc but they would get better publicity and promotion of their own secondary schools competitions.
I must say I would be more inclined to support a club that develops young players rather than pay players to ensure the senior team does well. That does nothing for the game, as the pay for players gig is cyclic. Island Bay have done it, Wairarapa United...Richmond United - and I see they got hammered 6-0 recently, after all the paid players departed when the money disappeared.
Look at Central United. I spoke with a club board member today and he said this winter the objective for the Northern Premier League side was to secure a midtable finish and avoid relegation. It's a relatively young side, and yet they top the league. That is what happens when you have a development plan in place. It's not an overnight thing but Central have always brough along some good players. Meantime all around them, the other sides are throwing money (and you can bet some of it is charitable trust coin disguised as something else) to players just to try and secure a top placing in a competition with no prize money. You gotta ask yourself who is crazy here.


    Spot on yet again. You could be mistaken for being born in Dunedin mate. In fact talking about Dunedin I see they have come to an arrangement where their schools only play midweek - check out www.soccersouth.co.nz. What a great idea.
    I know Fred Simpson (former Director of Football with Mainland) proposed exactly that - a floodlit mid week tournament for schools but the bloody schools rejected it. I am so sick of their attitude that I have flagged admin/coaching in my club for this very reason.
As to the money go round my club have tried this as well only to see it fail and end up relegated and yes it was dodgy money (how many clubs do this - come on be honest). Actually this was my idea originally as I was sick of seeing us put out average teams that struggled but it was not sustainable.
    One thing we are crying out for down here is an all weather pitch like hockey use - their model is a good example actually.
cheers.
Ronaldoknow2007-06-04 21:50:36

What's sight without sound? Love without peace? Copulation without conception?

Permalink Permalink
almost 19 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
The Burnside mens team might be weak (I'm not sure if it is, just assuming from Ronaldoknow's comments) but believe me, at the younger levels they have some class players. Last season, when I played junior-youth (15-16th grade combined) there were about 15 players in my team and all of the players were good, but some of them were phenomenal, we went the whole season unbeaten and were top of the table. I would be quite surprised if, in future, some of those players aren't playing in the NZFC or above.


Yes it is weak - thrashed recently 5-0 by Western. They are paying a bunch of old men like Grosvenor and Murphy good money while they lose good players such as NZ U17 rep Geoff McIntyre & Paris Kerdemilidis to other clubs.
    Most clubs have got class players in their juniors but what do their senior sides do to encourage them to stay? For 5 years I was heavily involved in developing a youth side to play in Super Youth football in ChCh with limited success. The biggest problem we faced was getting good players promoted into the firsts! In the end it became unsustainable for us and the whole system has now folded. Frigging waste of time, not that I'm bitter or anything.
    Keep playing and aim high (I assume you are a fullback).
Ronaldoknow2007-06-04 21:59:46

What's sight without sound? Love without peace? Copulation without conception?

Permalink Permalink
almost 19 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I actually like Keith Grosvenor but you are right, until clubs look to a proper development programme we are just going to continue to go around in circles. Good coaches should be looking to involve talented youth. Coaches that continue to play the same old names from yesteryear because of their reputations are doing our game a disservice...and there are just too many of them. Clubs need to decide what sort of club they want to be; chasing the glory at all costs, or developing the future of the game...the talented youngsters. How many times do we see teams fork out huge bucks to win a competition and then the next season the $$$ suddenly dries up.
It's no secret Waikakere United paid Comins Menapi a good wack but it didn't win them the NZFC. Still, they won the O-League so perhaps money well invested this time;-p
Manawatu United went out of business importing and paying too many journeymen UK players, although Reg Robinson was a goodun and Mt Maunganui went tits up. Blockhouse Bay are no more, Mt Wellington are playing local league in Auckland....the list is endless isn't it.
We are playing more locals in the NZFC compared to the 80's when the National League was dominated by UK players, so in that respect we are making some sort of progress, although the standard has dropped compared to back then. The upside is, if we can get more local talent into the NZFC it has to improve our players. Too many clubs still have this "elite" mentality which is choking the game.
 
Permalink Permalink
almost 19 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Again another good point raised. I believe the standard has lifted all over the country in the last few years with fewer imports which is a very good thing. The imports should be coming in to teams like the Phoenix and our local young guns should be aiming to make this team through the NZFC. These franchises have a responsibility to bring good young players through and again I think this is starting to happen. Clubs in local leagues should then remain strictly amateur. I actually approve the stance Mt Wellington have taken this season and think it is a good thing for the game. I presume they are having to promote younger talent these days?

What's sight without sound? Love without peace? Copulation without conception?

Permalink Permalink
almost 19 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
If we were doing our thing to help out Oceania we should be looking to the islands for quality imports, rather than England. It's got to be better for oceania as a confederation to have their players playing at a good level. I havent seen a Fijian league match to know how good it is but they do get better crowds than we do.
Mt Wellington would have folded if they didn't do what they did. Players were leaving because they weren't going to get any wedge and the club has a facility that was stagnating. They would be better to invest in upgrading Bill McKinlay Park and then in the future I'm sure they would attract players to an excellent environment. I hope they upgrade that place.
Permalink Permalink
almost 19 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I watched the local Fijian club final in Suva the year before last (Che Bunce was playing) and the standard wasn't too bad. Bunce didn't stand out, so quite a few of their players would cut it in the NZFC.
Imports from the Oceania region is a good idea.
Ronaldoknow2007-06-06 21:32:58

What's sight without sound? Love without peace? Copulation without conception?

Permalink Permalink
almost 19 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
LondonChris, some of the money bandied about can be ridiculous. I recall when i was on the board of Waikato UNITED (prior to their amalgamation with Melville AFC) being TOLD by the coach that we were paying this player (who I won't name cos he knows me and I need a punch in the head like the next man) $365.00 a game. That was for home and away games and when we were relying on gates to cover some of these player payments it was a real worry. I was one of the people responsible for winding up Waikato United. We had to do it because legal advice suggested that board members would be liable for any debts...and the club was losing money from all areas including the bar!
 
 
This wouldn't be Declan Edge or Darren Fallowes would it.  And the manager you mentioned wouldn't be a famous ex All White and Kingz coach?
disco_mart2007-06-16 08:10:59
Supporter world's best and worst football teams: Waikato/WaiBop, Kingz, Knights, Phoenix, The Argyle, The Whites & the All Whites

Permalink Permalink
almost 19 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
And that is exactly why kiwis can't make a career out of football. There is no money in the local game here and on the world stage we are nothing in reality. For every good young player here (Brockie, White, pelter et al) there are dozens in every country that runs a professional league.

What's sight without sound? Love without peace? Copulation without conception?

Permalink Permalink