National League / OCL

Why cant any kiwis make a football career

57 replies · 14,959 views
almost 19 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Why cant any kiwis make a football career
Permalink Permalink
almost 19 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Hey Everyone

I'm making a documentary about this topic and just wanted some views on the topic.

Is it cos of the lack of funding for soccer in new zealand?

Or is it something else?
Please comment.
Jakey
Permalink Permalink
almost 19 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
They can if they're A League standard - it may not pay as well as overseas but it's not bad money.
 
NZFC players would struggle though - I know of one player who has been offer 800 Aus per week to play in the Victorian Premier League and that rises to 1000 if they win that week - most NZFC clubs would struggle to match that.

Peoples Republik of Aucklandia

Permalink Permalink
almost 19 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Have you ever been to a game in NZ and seen the crowd size?
 
See if you can find many nations of 4 million people where Football is the number two sport, and players can make a living. The fact is our economy aint big enough to support two major sports. Even sport like Cricket and Netball pale in compairson to Rugby here. There simply aint the audience, sponsorship, infrastructure to support more than one major sport.
Permalink Permalink
almost 19 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Who you making it for Jakey.
I can probably get you some contacts, etc. Was in that game meself.
Permalink Permalink
almost 19 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
phil_style wrote:
Have you ever been to a game in NZ and seen the crowd size?
 
See if you can find many nations of 4 million people where Football is the number two sport, and players can make a living. The fact is our economy aint big enough to support two major sports. Even sport like Cricket and Netball pale in compairson to Rugby here. There simply aint the audience, sponsorship, infrastructure to support more than one major sport.


This 'truth' has left me feeling quite depressed.
Permalink Permalink
almost 19 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Cricket wouldn't be in the position it is if it weren't for the National Bank subsidising the sport. No one goes to physically watch the National Bank Cup or whatever its called yet cricket has money. NZFC sides attract more spectators to football. Once the game gets the injection of money then we'll be away and laughing. You've also got the fact that sometimes the best players aren't even playing in the NZFC. You get sides offering players good money (eg $10,000) to play a season in the Northern Premier League...and its probably a similar story in the Central and Southern leagues. Then these players expect the NZFC sides to match or pay better. I think a few seasons back Waikato FC took $36000 in gate takings for the season. that money would be gobbled up by a paying of a couple of key players.
If New Zealand Soccer looked at running the game like cricket, we'd have proper contracted players in the NZFC but they would need a major sponsor to get on board like a bank.
People also get an overdose of Premier League and when they see our NZFC the comparisons start rolling....this is sh%t compared to the PL etc. We've got to find and develop skilled technically proficient players that can go on and win games in the All Whites. The All Whites are the shop window and the big thing is, they don't win games often enough. The last overseas trip where we played games against Costa Rica and Venezuela just highlighted how far behind we are. 0 goals scored and 9 conceded.
Then you have this nonesense of people saying danny Hay should be signing for the Phoenix when clearly its time for him to head to the retirement village.
Permalink Permalink
almost 19 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Or it might be the BNZ sponsoring cricket. I just don't have any interest in the game or in rugby to really recall the finer details but either way money is what we need.
Permalink Permalink
almost 19 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Spot on Kiwi Canary unless the All Whites are more competitive football will always struggle. Interesting that our most successful team sports rugby, cricket, league and netball are minority sports worldwide. Maybe this is why we are competitive in these sports? Much easier to be competitive in a sport where most countries have little or no interest. 
Permalink Permalink
almost 19 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
sanday wrote:
Much easier to be competitive in a sport where most countries have little or no interest. 
 
Truth indeed. However I do think NZ tend to puch above their weight in terms of sport (except football).
Permalink Permalink
almost 19 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

Right on Sanday! The general sporting public in NZ get that feel-good factor when we win at sporting events we are good at...and yes they are minority sports in the global sense of things.

I personally get little satisfaction from being a national of the country that wins an Americas Cup, Rugby World Cup or Netball World Cup, and cricket is just sad excuse for wasting a day anyway. They mean very little to people in Brazil, Mexico, Spain, Germany, Africa, 95% of Europe. If you are going to win something, I'm of the belief you want to win it in a competition where there is a high number of teams to pit your skills against.
 
Look, I quite like Rugby League or specificially the NRL as a competition but look at the sport on an international scale. It's a complete joke. You have Australia, New Zealand, Gt Britain, France, Papua New Guinea and...er I'm stuck now. You can't have a world cup of league when only half a dozen countries play the game seriously.
 
On their day most teams in footballs top 20 could win the world cup. Hell Greece won the Euro 2004 champs. Put that in rugby terms and it would be like Portugal beating England in rugby. Now I know that they qualified for the Rugby World Cup by beating Uruguay over two legs by one point but come on...England to lose to Portugal?
 
I think our expectation levels on sporting achievement are set too low.
Permalink Permalink
almost 19 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
I reckon the public of NZ are blinded to how average of sports rugby, cricket and netball actually are. The NZ team aren't competitive internationally, but if they had elliot, nelsen, killen etc then they wouldn't be half bad and it would create a much higher interest in football. Another problem football in NZ has is there are a lot of snobby football fans who like english of spanish football but completely ignore, and laugh at, football at home. Its no wonder football isn't growing hugely here, it's because a lot of fans who are like that don't support it.
Permalink Permalink
almost 19 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
The problem is that there are a couple of hundred thousand people playing the game from junior through to Sunday league level and incorpoarting the womens game. Now all these people must get some pleasure out of playing the recreational side of the game and they must have some interest in it otherwise why play the game? So how do you harness these numbers and get them going to watch a top level New Zealand game? If we were able to attract a high percentage of people to these games and charged a few bucks per head, that is when the game suddenly will burst into life. The money generated can be used to further enhance facilities etc. There aren't many grounds in NZ that are covered for a start, or that even have a stand that can hold 1000 fans. If clubs could develop their facilities instead of pay mercenaries to play for them and try and win a league that has no prizemoney, then the local game would be in a much healthier state.
Permalink Permalink
almost 19 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

spot on canary

Permalink Permalink
almost 19 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Wow guys thats great stuff its always good to get some real footy heads into it. Everything posted was gold and im sure to look at in more depth.
ON THE PHOENIX
Jake
Permalink Permalink
almost 19 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
sanday wrote:
Spot on Kiwi Canary unless the All Whites are more competitive football will always struggle.

That's a catch 22 situation though isn't it?

As cultured as Che Bunce's left foot and as profilic as John Lammers

Permalink Permalink
almost 19 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
sawu wrote:
sanday wrote:
Spot on Kiwi Canary unless the All Whites are more competitive football will always struggle.

That's a catch 22 situation though isn't it?
Yes you are correct. What is the answer? Start at the bottom. We already have good participation at junior level. Maybe coaching at the lower levels needs to be better? We just need more players of better quality at the top end. A problem soccernz have been working on hopefully.
Permalink Permalink
almost 19 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

 I agree with a lot of what has been said. I wondered whether teams from the Championship in England or league one could be invited to NZ for a series of games against the All Whites or Phoenix during their close seasons? The NZ FA would I am sure have to susidise this (and would probably be unlikely to get Premiership sides visiting) but I wonder whether it might generate some extra interest in the sport. I think one issue is that domestic/homegrown football (apart from the A-Legaue) is just not popular in this region - so encouraging sides that some Kiwis watch on TV to travel here from Europe might be one way of promoting interest in home grown football. 

Permalink Permalink
almost 19 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Dunfermline from the Scottish SPL came here a couple of years ago and perhaps because of who they were, they didn't attract large crowds. It was a loss making exercise.  From the people I work with and who aren't football fans, they would rather watch a Brazilian or Argentinian side play than and English PL side. I'm not sure why this is. I'd go and watch Norwich City play if they came here but I really wouldn't bother with any other English club unless it was say Blackburn who have kiwi content in their squad.
However, its all conjecture as New Zealand Soccer just can't afford the $800, 000 to a million bucks or more that it would cost to bring out a name side and with no one else willing to act as promoter of such events, I think they will be a thing of the past. It would be foolish of the national body to put everything at risk to bring Manchester United or another top side here and suffer insuffient support. NZ football people are notorious for not supporting their own game. How many of you subscribe to Soccer Talk for example? NZ's only football monthly magazine. You have to invest in the local game before it will go anywhere. History shows that we can't even support our own professional sides.
Auckland with all its Northern League sides, Auckland leagues and Sunday leagues, women, juniors etc failed miserably to support the Kingz and then the Knights. 3000 people from a population of well over a million is a poor return. They should have been drawing three times that at the very least.
For me, it's a waste of time and money for the All Whites to be playing club sides. New Zealand gains no ranking points in these games. Therefore it is better to through the money at international sides who are higher ranked compared to us. And remember, if NZ has a low ranking then it makes it extra difficult for our players to gain contracts in Europe.
Sadly the only way people will get interested in the game is if the All Whites can turn themselves into consistent winners, rather than consistent losers they are. Look at how the All Blacks can string 10 wins or whatever in a row. The last time that happened in football was probably the 1981/82 WC campaign.
 
Permalink Permalink
almost 19 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Auckland with all its Northern League sides, Auckland leagues and Sunday leagues, women, juniors etc failed miserably to support the Kingz and then the Knights. 3000 people from a population of well over a million is a poor return. They should have been drawing three times that at the very least.
 
The problem for me with the Knights was the underlying assumption that because I was a football fan I would follow them as a given. They never did anything to entice me or anyone I know to games. I would have loved to have had a couple of players come to my school and run a coaching clinic for the kids - a one off - that could have secured them some more support but it never happened. They announced a Kick Bullying Out Of School's progamme that disappeared as fast as it was announced. 
If I wanted to watch a bunch of lower-league UK cast-offs I'd get Conference DVDs sent out to me. They misread the public's wishes and, after season one, had a second chance to correct that but contrived to make all the same mistakes all over again.
They were mismanaged at all levels, and frankly I wanted no part of it.
 
The reason I'm getting behind The Nix so much is that I like the way they are doing things. They have a good, marketable name that means something (The Knights? What the frig has that got to do with anything?), are signing the sort of players I want to see play and thus far appear to be a very well run organisation. Time will tell, but they've got my support all the way.
Nix, Leyton Orient and Alloa Athletic supporting schmuck.

Permalink Permalink
almost 19 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Mate is my brain inside your head or what!:-) Yep, I consider myself a hardcore football fan like yourself...a Kiwi hardcore fan. And when the Kiwi player content whittled away I lost interest. There was too much wordplay...stepping stones for young Kiwi footballers for example, and those in charge played us for fools. The list of miserable, poor, UK cast-offs was a soap drama in itself. The fans got taken for a ride in the end. We know a good player as much as guys like Fallon do. We read the game, we know what is what but to get told that Frank Van Eijs was a quality import was an insult to my intelligence. I have friends in Holland who emailed me asking why were the Kingz signing a player who was known to have mental problems? He came from FC Vietnam for chrissake. A competition well below the status of the A League. The overseas signings were all the go. The local signings far and few between. Cole Tinkler got a season and then got discarded. What sort of development is that? The Phoenix are heading in the right direction. I'm not sure why they haven't gone for Ben Sigmund. Very short on local talent and here's a player voted Player of the Year and Players Player of The Year at Auckland City - the NZFC champions. Not good enough? He may yet end up at Melbourne Victory...
It's debateable but the Kiwi content in the Phoenix still needs to be increased. And after todays story on Che Bunce in the Waikato Times its obvious he is unlikely to play for Wellington in the A League.
Permalink Permalink
almost 19 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Bunce really stuck it to Herbert. I am still not convinced that Herbert managing both teams is in the best interests of New Zealand football. Time will tell. 
Permalink Permalink
almost 19 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
sanday wrote:
Bunce really stuck it to Herbert. I am still not convinced that Herbert managing both teams is in the best interests of New Zealand football. Time will tell. 
 
I have my doubts on this too, like I'm sure everyone here has if they are really honest. I mean, the season is a couple of months away, but even now Ricki has to put on his AWs hat and put The Nix to the back of his mind while the national side play a couple of games in Europe. Then he's back here and the AWs hat comes off and The Nix one goes back on. Not only is it an impossible stressful situation to be in, but there are issues of conflict of interest, no matter what anyone says.
 
However...
 
If anyone in NZ football can make it work (fnarr, fnarr) it is Ricki Herbert. I've known him for a number of years. We are not mates or anything - in fact if you asked him my name he'd probably look at your blankly - but I've had cause to deal with him and talk to him over time and he has an energy and a passion that is infectious, and he is also a thoroughly decent man. His knowledge of the game is first-rate and he has played at a level that a lot of our players will never reach. He knows what it is like to be one of them - a player - in both positive and negative situations. And this is why I think everyone needs to look beyond the obvious "two jobs/one man" argument and give him total support. In a short while we may well be chanting his name from rooftops.
 
And finally, the last really decent man (IMHO) that was in such a position in NZ was a certain Keith Pritchett. He was shafted bigtime by a lot of folk in NZ and the loss of Keith from the top echelon of football in New Zealand was far greater than a lot of people think. Let's not let the same happen to Ricki Herbert, we can't afford to lose people of this calibre.
Nix, Leyton Orient and Alloa Athletic supporting schmuck.

Permalink Permalink
almost 19 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
NZ football people are notorious for not supporting their own game. How many of you subscribe to Soccer Talk for example? NZ's only football monthly magazine. You have to invest in the local game before it will go anywhere.
 
Does Soccer Talk invest back into the game a portion of their revenue. Is it privately owned?

If we build it, they will come...

Permalink Permalink
almost 19 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
There are some good points in these posts! It is difficult question to answer. How to improve the game in NZ?
 
I just wish I was a mulit millionare so I could afford to plug 10 million into the NZ game every year.
 
Think what you could do with that sort of money. The ideas would be endless. What sort of sponsorhip revenue does NZ Football get, does anyone know?
 
Maybe we should start a joint effort. "Sponsor a team". Some people can't be bothered going to domestic games in NZ, but some might be willing to sponsor $50 a year to a team if other people were doing the same. Get a 1000 supporters and you got $50k to encourage some of the better players into your northern league team or what ever. I am not talking about championship level. You might even be encouraged to go and suport the team that you got your money in.
 
Big business sponsors have got to get involved. Not worry about the exposure they will get from their investment(cause it won't be much). Think of it as a charity and what ever they are giving now, times it by 10 this year. Write it off for a good cause.
 
So what team should i donate my $50 too? 
 
 
LondonChris2007-05-20 23:58:06

If we build it, they will come...

Permalink Permalink
almost 19 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
There are some good points in these posts! It is difficult question to answer. How to improve the game in NZ?
 
Maybe we should start a joint effort. "Sponsor a team". Some people can't be bothered going to domestic games in NZ, but some might be willing to sponsor $50 a year to a team if other people were doing the same. Get a 1000 supporters and you got $50k to encourage some of the better players into your northern league team or what ever. I am not talking about championship level. You might even be encouraged to go and suport the team that you got your money in.
 
So what team should i donate my $50 too? 
 
 
 
No-one. Businesses have been near-bankrupting themselves (plumbing manufacturing company involved with a certain Ak based northern league team) and businessmen self-destructing (popular potato-chip company's manager getting himself in serious sh*t) to try and help out clubs or the game for years. The money goes into the players pockets (and how many of them are worth paying a cent anyhow) and away from the game. Been tried, doesn't work, next suggestion?
Sorry to be negative, but the whole mentality in the game needs to change. It's not about paying just anyone, it's about paying the right people. And rarely are these people the players.
Nix, Leyton Orient and Alloa Athletic supporting schmuck.

Permalink Permalink
almost 19 years ago · edited over 13 years ago

Yes once again my man, you speak with wisdom. I myself got stung sponsoring Waikato FC players and purchasing Michael Utting a car so that he would sign for the franchise. In the end the players take what they can get and it's us poor suckers that are left to pick up the pieces. And we get no thanks for it either. The players aren't interested and then they wonder why I went off my rocker everytime they accrued a yellow or red card. As an administrator you are left to raise the dollars to pay for fines because 9 times out of 10th players won't pay it or the coach will say that the club can take care of it. And that is it for me. You have volunteers in most cases raising the funds and the players just milking the system. I would really love to build up a website and list all the players that have ripped off clubs by demanding money to play or playing clubs off against each other for their services. Whilst LondonChris has a good suggestion there, sadly you and I know it will never work.

Permalink Permalink
almost 19 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
The post about Soccer Talk investing back into the game made me smile. No, financially it doesnt invest back into the local game but what it does invest in, is giving players a profile, the game a profile and fans their only regular football publication in this country. It nearly folded last year due to lack of support by the football community. There are a bunch of people who contribute to it, I supply photos for free but then that is me. I like to give something back to the game. Others take payment but then if it is their livelihood it would only be fair to charge for services supplied.
Soccer Talk is privately owned and then it is also a secondary thing for the guy who is the editor. He couldn't make a living out of it fulltime....not until people get off their ass and subscribe to it.
Only then will it get better and then I could get paid for my photos, buy better equipment and take even better photos. I'd encourage all football fans to sub to it because when it is gone it will be too late. I personally subscribe to it and I did a two for one deal with Paul Kotrotsos (Olympic) and so it only cost us $30.50 each for 12 issues. If you can get onto that deal then find a friend and do it. Again its about money and getting money into the support structures of football. Having our own magazine is part of that. The more subscribers and buyers then contributors get paid, are more willing to do extra to help the product get better and it would be great to have some media actually making money from the game. We'd have better football coverage if we could generate more money to cover writers and photographers. That is my dream anyway.
Permalink Permalink
almost 19 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
The Jam and Kiwi Canary. Thanks for your advice and comments.
 
I might take me $50 and subscribe to "Soccer Talk" then. Do they post to overseas?
 
I think I agree with all what you are both saying. I just want the public to get behind the game more. I guess there is no easy solution.
 
If we started paying the players more it wouldn't really make a difference I guess. We would still be paying the same players. I guess I was thinking long term. If young players can see that they can get paid more and have a chance of a career out of it, then we might encourage more players to get involved and stay longer in the game.
 
 

If we build it, they will come...

Permalink Permalink
almost 19 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Hey not a problem. Check out www.soccertalk.co.nz and I think you can subscribe direct from the website now. They even do credit cards. Email the Editor Glen Price from the website and ask re overseas subs. I'm sure he already has some so he can quote you direct.
We all want to see the game progress. Personally I think the current U17's are the starting point for the future of our game. Some really good technical players coming on. As for the current players in the 25 plus age group I just don't think they will advance their own skills much more. It's really too late if they havent got those technical abilities by the time they are 17 or 18.
We've got to find and develop these players and get them into clubs overseas. Once we can get a pool of say 25 players playing at a decent level in Europe or where-ever, then we should start to see results come our way.
Permalink Permalink
almost 19 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
 
If we started paying the players more it wouldn't really make a difference I guess. We would still be paying the same players. I guess I was thinking long term. If young players can see that they can get paid more and have a chance of a career out of it, then we might encourage more players to get involved and stay longer in the game.
 
 
 
I've got no problem paying some players, it's just the players who normally do get money aren't worth it. Have a look at clubs like Glenfield Rovers and Bay Olympic (both in Auckland) paying players and for what end result? To win the local league? Big deal, does that lead to anything? No.
I've singled out two clubs here but there are scores more. In fact, I'd go so far as to say virtually all Auckland clubs have done it. You could probably work out who was paying the money year by year by following the career paths of certain players...
Better to spend your entire player budget on an imported player with a good pedigree, (which would also take research, an area where our clubs have let them down so many times) and employ him full-time for the club coaching kids. Too much money goes to the players for no return.
I'm mainly talking here about clubs at a lower level than NZFC. At NZFC level, the players have to work harder than they have before, and probably deserve a little bit, but even that should be incentive based. It's the local league players getting paid that totally baffles me.
Nix, Leyton Orient and Alloa Athletic supporting schmuck.

Permalink Permalink
almost 19 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
 
 
 THE JAM
" Have a look at clubs like Glenfield Rovers and Bay Olympic (both in Auckland) paying players and for what end result?"
 
 
Out of interest what sort of money do these players get at this level? Is it one ore two players getting a couple of hundred dollars a game or is it more than that?
LondonChris2007-05-23 01:35:01

If we build it, they will come...

Permalink Permalink
almost 19 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
i did hear a rather amazing story of a glenfield rovers player turning down the kingz because the salary on offer was comparable to what he was getting at glenfield.  the point of difference being that he could also hold his day job by playing for glenfield, and couldn't do so at the kingz

360footballnews.com

Permalink Permalink
almost 19 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Da Selekta wrote:
i did hear a rather amazing story of a glenfield rovers player turning down the kingz because the salary on offer was comparable to what he was getting at glenfield.  the point of difference being that he could also hold his day job by playing for glenfield, and couldn't do so at the kingz
 
True, I won't name him but his initials are Dean Dodds.
The money can be much more than anyone would think. I know of one player who has had all his Uni fees paid (and I think he's gone to Masters level). I also know of a coach with a dubious reputation (which I can't discuss lest I end up before a judge) who has been from club to club taking on average $20,000 a season. It's effing ridiculous.
Nix, Leyton Orient and Alloa Athletic supporting schmuck.

Permalink Permalink
almost 19 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
You wouldn't be talking the MICKEY would you, Jam? I heard Dodds was raking in a nice $10k for a season with Glenfield but it may even be more than that.
Permalink Permalink
almost 19 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
LondonChris, some of the money bandied about can be ridiculous. I recall when i was on the board of Waikato UNITED (prior to their amalgamation with Melville AFC) being TOLD by the coach that we were paying this player (who I won't name cos he knows me and I need a punch in the head like the next man) $365.00 a game. That was for home and away games and when we were relying on gates to cover some of these player payments it was a real worry. I was one of the people responsible for winding up Waikato United. We had to do it because legal advice suggested that board members would be liable for any debts...and the club was losing money from all areas including the bar!
Permalink Permalink
almost 19 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Wow. I think NZ football is just all over the place. So there are people willing to throw money at the game. But we still don't have those paying fans turning upto games at any level. Lets hope Wellington get right behind the Phoenix. A successful few seasons for Phoenix, performance and gate receipt wise and there may be argument for a second NZ based team getting into the A-League.
 
I played for Glenfield Rovers Reserves one season; 7 years back. I don't think I paid my annual fees; does that make me a semi-professional player? Something to tell the grandchildren.

If we build it, they will come...

Permalink Permalink
almost 19 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
You wouldn't be talking the MICKEY would you, Jam? I heard Dodds was raking in a nice $10k for a season with Glenfield but it may even be more than that.
 
So, this coach with the, um, reputation, why does he keep getting coaching positions? If some of us on here know about it (and it's not just for taking money off football clubs, it's something far, far worse),  why don't the clubs that appoint him? Or maybe they do, but overlook his "issues". But why would you? What's he ever achieved anyway?
Football in this country will always be effed while this sort of thing carries on unabated.
Nix, Leyton Orient and Alloa Athletic supporting schmuck.

Permalink Permalink
almost 19 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
Perhaps some of the clubs have new committees and consequently they don't really have a clue about the people they appoint as coaches. I really don't know the answer, but you'd think the person in question would just about have done his dash coaching. I saw him in action a few weeks ago. I'm not a fan of the ranting and raving coach and I do think that overall coaching standards are quite poor here. You're quite right too, this dude hasn't acheived anything of note.
Permalink Permalink
almost 19 years ago · edited over 13 years ago
PLAIN AND SIMPLE! THE REASON WHY KIWIS CANT MAKE IT IN FOOTBALL:
Because they need to be tought and adapt to a new style of football!
Kiwis with eurpean backrounds like Bertos are good because they do not play the boring brockie style kiwi football but insted play with flair and try take players on! That is why he is good. BASIC!!!
Permalink Permalink