Smells like sour grapes from Adidas there. No doubt they wanted our business and Warrior out bid them. Good business that from FSG, building the profile through the back of the Red Sox in the states. Sounds like we've got control of the non playing gear too so maybe an opportunity for another sponsor to make that?
Another sensible move from FSG too with the Stadium:
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/teams/liverpool/9019171/Liverpool-opt-for-original-Stanley-Park-stadium-plan-to-replace-Anfield-after-rejecting-futuristic-design.html
Using H&G design would be costly, creating new plans would be just as costly too both in terms of monetary and time. No doubt the original plans can be improved a bit within their current consent. It'll be interesting to see who they get to sponsor it. Standard Chartered a front runner?
Smells like sour grapes from Adidas there. No doubt they wanted our business and Warrior out bid them. Good business that from FSG, building the profile through the back of the Red Sox in the states. Sounds like we've got control of the non playing gear too so maybe an opportunity for another sponsor to make that?
Another sensible move from FSG too with the Stadium:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/teams/liverpool/9019171/Liverpool-opt-for-original-Stanley-Park-stadium-plan-to-replace-Anfield-after-rejecting-futuristic-design.html
Using H&G design would be costly, creating new plans would be just as costly too both in terms of monetary and time. No doubt the original plans can be improved a bit within their current consent. It'll be interesting to see who they get to sponsor it. Standard Chartered a front runner?