Posted May 31, 2016 21:11 · last edited March 18, 2021 07:20
re: Sakho (just going back a bit) he was suspended correctly given the product was on the banned list. Appears his defence have proven it shouldn't have been. That's why the ban hasn't been handed down. Supposedly that leaves him with no grounds for suing, becomes they followed process.
Wonder what happens with his Nike contract then.
re: Sakho (just going back a bit) he was suspended correctly given the product was on the banned list. Appears his defence have proven it shouldn't have been. That's why the ban hasn't been handed down. Supposedly that leaves him with no grounds for suing, becomes they followed process.
Wonder what happens with his Nike contract then.