re: Sakho (just going back a bit) he was suspended correctly given the product was on the banned list. Appears his defence have proven it shouldn't have been. That's why the ban hasn't been handed down. Supposedly that leaves him with no grounds for suing, becomes they followed process.
re: Sakho (just going back a bit) he was suspended correctly given the product was on the banned list. Appears his defence have proven it shouldn't have been. That's why the ban hasn't been handed down. Supposedly that leaves him with no grounds for suing, becomes they followed process.